Showing posts with label best video baby monitor consumer reports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best video baby monitor consumer reports. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Q-See QC448-840-5 8-Channel Surveillance System with 500 GB Hard Drive and 8 Weatherproof Color CCD

Q-See QC448-840-5 8-Channel Surveillance System with 500 GB Hard Drive and 8 Weatherproof Color CCD Cameras, BlackAfter receiving the DVR and cameras I decided to set the system up temporarily so I could configure and test locally and remotely before installing on my third floor. Boy am I glad I did that!!! After 2 days, a new router, and 6 hours of reading all I could get to work was the local viewing on my LAN. 1st problem was that I have Verizon FIOS and the router they provide is trash. It would not let me forward my ports so I could gain access to the DVR from a remote internet connection. So I purchased a new ASUS router. After the new router was installed I was able to get connected on my mobile device, I phone 5, as well as on my local network. Still no remote internet connection. I searched Q-see.com and read everything I could find even searching Google. Nothing helped, I followed everything in could find to get a domain set up and still couldn't get remote access. Now to the 2nd problem, DVR set up instructions. What a disaster and how confusing. Once I called Q-see and talked with a wonderful technical support person, her name was Faith by the way, she had me up and running in minutes. Come to find out, everything sent with the system including the manuals are wrong. Even the software they send you to monitor the DVR has misleading information in it. All in all the system is wonderful. The customer support is wonderful, if you don't mind waiting to get through. But I must warn anyone looking to get this system on the internet to monitor remotely. Don't waste your time with the instructions, once you get the dvr and cameras plugged in, plug the network in and then call them. Hopefully you get someone as knowledgeable as Faith. The technical support will have you running in no time. Hope this helps anyone else from having the same issues I had.

I like the cameras and the ease of hooking them up . I am not very happy because i can not get the remote monitoring to work and it is very frustrating. Every time we go in to change options to connect to the modem they do not work and there is no phone number to call for help. They offer free tech support on the web, but sometimes you need to talk to someone in order to get things resolved.

Buy Q-See QC448-840-5 8-Channel Surveillance System with 500 GB Hard Drive and 8 Weatherproof Color CCD Now

After reciving the unit i went to table test the unit to make sure all camera's and cords worked. The sytem is set up out of the box to a high resolution screen setting so when i tried to hook up using a vga cord it would not display so i call customer service to be put on hold for a hour before being hung up on called back one more hour on hold. I had to rewire system to work from rca cords to get screen to work long enough to get into system and reset screen setting to lower res to work on my monitor. Now one week into use the hard drive has froze 3 diff times in a week. keeps my screen locked onto old pictures until i reboot dvr. Amazon is sending a replacement but i would not buy this one again and if this new unit does the same i will be sending all of it back. It would not be fun to take down 8 camera's 1000 feet of wires and 2 days worth of work becouse of cheap china junk. No where in discription does it say comes with wires for camera so i ordered 8 150 foot cords only to have cords in the box Buyer beware of this unit. will keep fingers crossed that the new hard drive does not freeze up also.

UPDATE: replacement unit arrived as i was only going to swith out hard drives as the one i bought freezes all the time. I hook up new hard drive only to have it in constant spin mode once its powered up it makes a loud spinning noise like a bad hard drive in search mode. Amazon has no link for replacing a replaced order. So stuck with a piece of s*** that freezes as i sent back the replacement order. Beware of this cheap china unit.

Read Best Reviews of Q-See QC448-840-5 8-Channel Surveillance System with 500 GB Hard Drive and 8 Weatherproof Color CCD Here

We ordered this system a few months ago and we have been VERY happy with it. My husband had no trouble setting up the cameras and networking them. The picture quality is pretty good, not perfect, but enough if you are using it to monitor children on the other end of the house or your home when you are not there.

My only real complaint about this product is the software. The software on the DVR is ok it takes some getting used to the different areas should be labeled more clearly so you can find what you want, but it's not that bad. The real problem is the software for iOS. One of the main reason I got this was because you could monitor your cameras from your iPhone or iPad.

Unfortunately the iOS apps are complete crap. They crash constantly, and half of the functions do not even work. For example, taking a photo doesn't work. It DID work for my husband on his iPhone4 until he upgraded to iOS 6 and then he couldn't even do it any more. On the iPhone you can only watch 4 cameras at a time, understandably because of the screen size, but the quality isn't quite as nice as if you are watching it from the monitor hooked up to the DVR. iPad can show all cameras, but it crashes quite a bit.

But, honestly, for the price I got this for (it was a daily deal) and aside from the iOS app problems this works wonderfully. I'm very glad we invested in this.

Want Q-See QC448-840-5 8-Channel Surveillance System with 500 GB Hard Drive and 8 Weatherproof Color CCD Discount?

In a rural area with no street lights and many minutes away from the nearest police, this gave me the eyes I needed to see what is around my house day and night.

Easy setup and operation. Has worked well even at winter temps below zero degrees.

I patched the video output into the TV antenna system, which is wired to every room and TV int he house using a Video to RF Converter. (Dynex RF Modulator) Now all I have to do is switch any TV to AIR CH 4 and I can view the 8 cameras. See who is knocking at the door or coming up the driveway without getting off of the couch!

Save 1% Off

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Moultrie Gamespy 4 Megapixel Digital Infrared Mtm Game Camera, 8.25x5.75x11

Moultrie Gamespy 4 Megapixel Digital Infrared Mtm Game Camera, 8.25x5.75x11The battery life on this is extremly short. I have delay set to 1 minute and yet the batteries (D) are dead within 5 days.

The mounting strap on this product is cheap. It broke within 1 day.

Pictures in low light situations are not clear, early morning, night and dusk. I bought it for the Game-Spy system that I never used because of the poor quality of this camera.

I do not like this product very because of the slow trigger speed shuts off during the night and day even though it is on the on position batteries get too hot pictures are not clear at night

Buy Moultrie Gamespy 4 Megapixel Digital Infrared Mtm Game Camera, 8.25x5.75x11 Now

bought this camera to replace another !!i wasn,t very happy with it slow trgger speed ,blury night pictures , short battery life.....I wouldn,t recomend this camera to a friend

Read Best Reviews of Moultrie Gamespy 4 Megapixel Digital Infrared Mtm Game Camera, 8.25x5.75x11 Here

Have had 2 of these cameras and cannot say much good about them. Both lasted just out of the warranty period and died. As stated by others, the battery life was extremely short so I was using external batteries which helped but its really not a quality product. Honestly, I've had 7 Moultrie products and none of them , cameras or feeders have lasted over 2 years without something going wrong.Digital timers went out of feeders and cameras have all died in short order (100, 200's, I-40 and I-45's )and now they're all in the trash. Found the Bushnell's to be much better and I could purchase an extended warranty which took it to 3 years since they come with a two year warranty a much better deal !

Want Moultrie Gamespy 4 Megapixel Digital Infrared Mtm Game Camera, 8.25x5.75x11 Discount?

Good service & quality.. On time and as advertised.

Will continue to buy online due in part to the quality products & service.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

Linksys Compact Wireless-G Internet Video Camera

Linksys Compact Wireless-G Internet Video CameraThe image quality of this camera isn't great, and as the other reviewer states, it needs lots of light. The resolution of the video is fairly poor, comparable to a very cheap 4-year-old webcam. If you need to see detail in the image (e.g. for certain security-camera purposes), then it will not work.

Another thing to note is that this camera is much bigger than it looks--it is about the size of your hand. I was hoping to squeeze it into a tight space, but the camera's size took me by surprise. It will be difficult to hide this camera if you are hoping to use it for hidden security purposes.

In sum, if you need a cheap camera that can sit out in the open and take low-detail video of a well-lit room, then this is your product. Otherwise, you should look for more professional (or wired) cameras.

Linksys seems to be living in the last decade. This camera can only be observed remotely with an ActiveX capable browser, in other words, Internet Explorer.

What this means: NO Macintosh, NO Firefox, NO Flock...

To make it worse, the ActiveX control has an expired certificate, which means you can't install it without tweaking the default security settings in the browser.

Come on Linksys, you can do better!!!! How about Flash based video, or quicktime, or Windows Media Video? ActiveX is a thing of the past.

Buy Linksys Compact Wireless-G Internet Video Camera Now

I bought this based on my experiences with linksys products, but this is a piece of junk. It only works with activex with internet explorer, and only works over the internet with linksys' ddns service (free for ninety days and after that you pay for the life of the product). Doesn't work with IE7. Very sorry I bought it.

Read Best Reviews of Linksys Compact Wireless-G Internet Video Camera Here

The camera itself it not that bad. The design is ok. It's about like most typical Linksys products: ok documentation (but not great), so-so user interface but generally gets the job done. Initial setup is only mildly frustrating (the camera could not initially communicate with my Linksys router, which you'd think they might test back at the lab...) The fatal flaw with this camera is the SoloLink DDNS service. If you're not familiar with DDNS, it basically allows you to hook up the camera to your router and then assigns a domain name so that you can view the camera from any location by typing in an easy-to-remember domain name in a browser. I bought this camera to watch my house while on vacation. The service worked for about five minutes on the first day of the trip and then never worked again. Perhaps they will fix the service (is it a bandwidth issue?) but as of 9/06, it's horrible and I would stay away. On top of all that, you have to pay for this service. The box doesn't mention this, except if you read the small print where it says something like "free trial of SoloLink DDNS". You cannot use any other DDNS service...

If you plan to sit on your couch and see what's going on in your dining room or if you just want a webcam to take your picture while your chatting on IM with your buddy, then this camera may be for you. However, if you plan to view the images from outside your home over the Internet, save your money and wait for improved technology. I should also mention that the image quality is not great. For the five minutes that I could actually view the image, I only managed to see some dark, jagged images of my living room. In a well-lit room, it's probably better.

Want Linksys Compact Wireless-G Internet Video Camera Discount?

Linksys products are usually high quality. This is sadly not the case with the WVC54GC Internet Video Camera. I just finished testing mine, and I'll be returning it tomorrow. I'd rate it zero stars if that was allowed.

Do NOT buy this product! I have tried several brands of standalone netcams and the image produced by this Linksys camera is by far the worst -it is shockingly poor. Take a look at the "Customer Image" I've uploaded (click just below the main product image) and judge for yourself. The image was so blurry, I thought that perhaps I had forgotten to remove the protective cellophane covering the lens. No such luck. Any reviewer who says the image is OK does not have a clue what a decent video image should look like.

Also, this camera only supports remote viewing via Internet Explorer, under Windows, via an ActiveX control, which is a total joke. Forget about viewing your camera from anything but a Windows-based PC. Even if you're on a Windows PC, most public-access machines (say, a courtesy PC in an airport lounge) won't give you access since you'll be unable to download the ActiveX control required for viewing. Also, it has no audio support.

Save your money and buy a Veo Observer.

Thursday, April 24, 2014

SIIG Wireless USB to HDMI with Audio Kit (JU-HM0211-S1)

SIIG Wireless USB to HDMI with Audio KitHI,

First of all, I am trying to write a general review base on the users' point of view since most of the tech site already have all the tech info on the "Nitti gritty" testing of the chip spec and performance. I don't need to go there again and the key point is to look at the end product's total design integration and the easy use of the product + the impression of the video quality.

OK, Here we go

Package:

It is nicely packed in simple industrial type white box with a feature labels on it. I like it... didn't waste too much on the package and killing the tree.

It comes with

* The receiver unit

* The transmitter

* The HDMI cable (a plus since a lot of DVD player doesn't even include that anymore)

* AC adapter the power source

Overall the product is not bad looking besides that it doesn't feel or look like a cheap product.I am going to test it on different platform...

1> a HP Pavillion DV7t I7 2nd gen 8G system with ATI 1G video card... running win 7 HM Premium

2> an Older Toshiba M200 Centrino tablet pc (1.8G) with 785M + Win 7

3> a P4 desktop 2.8G / 1.5G M / Win XP HM sp2 (if I have time)

You can see that I am curious about trying to run the device at the older Laptop/Desktop and see if the PC's horse power is going to be a big factor on the device's performance. (if it is well designed that it should take away too much PC's CPU power)

I will test the SIIG device with the system 1 first

The product comes with a smart design by preloading the drivers onto the USB receiver (embedded a small memory in the USB with all the drivers loaded) so there's no CD included with the product. NEAT!

The installation is pretty easy... after plug the USB .. the Video Chip Display link driver is installed (not bad... on the market the most popular two Video chips for the external video is MCT and Display link, although the MCT is as good on paper but display has a little edge on the performance)

next I hook up the receiver... the BLUE LED power indicator light up and before I know it that the green led lit up... after few experiment I know the light is wireless connection status indicator).. Then the PC start installing the Alereon wireless USB software (this is also a top brand wireless USB chip set)

**NOTE on the light -

GREEN-As long as the LED light is green that you are is a high performance safe zone... that's about 12 feet away

Yellow/Amber This happened when I was about 15 feet away and put the laptop in another room, you can see that the movie start to have a tiny little bit delay that cause the movie to lost some of its smoothness in motion.

RED lost connection or it is not connected. This is usually due to the fact that the transmitter and receiver is too far away. Or the device is not properly synced.

Anyway, I setup the video in extended mode and let the power DVD player, play the transformer 2 I pick the action movie so that I can see if there's any pixilation. By the way, I am able to push the TV resolution up to 1080P, but it is only good if you distance is less than 10 feet away. The transmitter and receiver better in the same room. (According to my experiment)

Brief summary:

* Video playback: 5 nice and smooth, I didn't notice any pixilation yet. I can even surf the net while the movie is playing

* Ease of use : 5 (very easy to install and use... almost like plug and play device)

* ID design and quality: 4.5 (not the pretties unit but good enough for me and the material it use is pretty good)

* Manual: 3.5 (the QIG is nice and clear to get you started, but for most of the uer that the complete manual is needed on website and I have called SIIG that they will put the full menu on web site later, but not yet.. this is bad for the user who is not expert with the PC)

* Overall impression: 4.5 (so I have to give 5 star for now)

Please stay tune... I will update and give you the older Laptop's general test result.

Oh, before I go...

**NOTE on the Audio... on Win 7 that you open the control panel -->device manager---> sound-->click on WUSB audio --> set as default if you didn't hear the Audio coming out from your laptop instead the TV

Dr. T

***** UPDATE.... finally got time to try the P4 system.... it also worked well it looks like the products' internal memory and processor able to handle most of the job....

I won't test on the Toshiba since the laptop it self has some video problem recently so I can't make judgement base on that PC.

hope the review help your guys out...

I bought this device as part of my cut the (pay TV) cord strategy. I have two TVs on the same level of the house that share video using an HDMI over Ethernet solution. My goal was to display the laptop to either TV regardless of where I was on that level of the house. I figured if it didn't have the range I could at least use it for the living room where I would benefit the most. My hope was that it would work through walls but I never found anything definitive either way in my research of the product. Most products like this require a line of sight.

The unit I received was a Hardware version 1. I plugged the base unit directly into a TV. I connected the USB transmitter into my Windows 8 laptop. There was no problem loading the drivers. After a reboot of the laptop, I was ready to try displaying it on the TV. It showed up as a secondary monitor and I extended the display to the TV. It seemed pretty decent just poking around Windows. I played a video and it was very choppy when displaying on the TV. I tried duplicating the displays instead of extending them, the result was about the same. When running as duplicates, the fact that the TV and laptop were different resolutions made the picture not fill the entire TV screen. That wasn't a huge surprise, I had to adjust to the TV to use a zoom mode. More toying around and I realize that just putting my hand around the USB transmitter would make it cut out. When I put the base unit up higher, I got better results. A good line of sight is required, it doesn't work through hands, knees, walls, or anything. I couldn't leave the room but I was getting somewhere. The range claims up to 30 ft. I got about 20 ft. before it would begin to cut out. It has some fluff features in the software that were less than useful. One is "Fit to TV" which did nothing to help with the different resolutions. The other, "Optimize for video" appeared to make no difference on video playback. Being that the manual didn't mention Windows 8, I tried it on a Windows 7 laptop. The results were the same except I had to go to the internet to get the drivers loaded.

Overall it's not an awful product but it's practical use is limited. I ended up setting up an HTPC and using VNC and/or a media center remote to control it.

Buy SIIG Wireless USB to HDMI with Audio Kit (JU-HM0211-S1) Now

This thing did EXACTLY what it was advertised to do! Installation was a little tricky on an older XP laptop.

Read Best Reviews of SIIG Wireless USB to HDMI with Audio Kit (JU-HM0211-S1) Here

Really disappointed, the product is faulty and will not power. Have contact customer services and hopefully they will be able to replace it for us and then I can give a more positive review.

Want SIIG Wireless USB to HDMI with Audio Kit (JU-HM0211-S1) Discount?

This device was purchased to replace another wireless HDMI device from 2009 that worked fine for a stretch, but it ran very hot and would eventually overheat and lock the display on the TV. On installing the device I was surprised to find that this device uses the exact same software as the 4 year old device and would not install. After subsequently uninstalling the old software and reinstalling what is essentially the same thing I could still not get the display component to be recognized. It finds the internal storage component with the on-chip software installation but not the display adapter, at least according to the confirmation process outline in the 4 page instruction pamphlet that came with the device. It also ran hotter than the other device it was replacing for its heat issues. A frustrating 40 minutes of failure, avoid this thing.

Save 10% Off

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Canon EOS Rebel T4i Digital SLR Camera Body & EF-S 18-55mm IS II Lens with 55-250mm IS Lens + 3

Canon EOS Rebel T4i Digital SLR Camera Body & EF-S 18-55mm IS II Lens with 55-250mm IS Lens + 32GB Card + Tripod + Battery + Case + Filters + Remote + Telephoto & Wide-Angle Lenses + Accessory KitThe BEST Camera I have ever had and for the price "Do not miss this deal it is the BEST"

So far it takes excelent prictures with such an incredible speed, I don't miss any moment waitting fo a camera to be ready anymore; thats the difference between a Point and shoot; and a SLR

Buy Canon EOS Rebel T4i Digital SLR Camera Body & EF-S 18-55mm IS II Lens with 55-250mm IS Lens + 3 Now

After our last vacation it became clear that I needed something much better than my little point and shoot. This camera is simply awesome! It's very easy to use, even for people who know very little about photography like me. What few pictures I've taken so far have been absolutely amazing! I've done a few shots in fully automatic mode and a few in manual mode, and everything is very easy and intuitive to use. Couldn't be happier!

This is a great package with a great camera for a great price! If I had to nitpick and find something to complain about, and I'm really grasping at straws here, it would be that there isn't a lens hood for the 55-250mm lens. It uses a different lens hood that's a bit longer than the one that comes in the package (ET-60). But that was only another couple dollars, so no big deal.

Read Best Reviews of Canon EOS Rebel T4i Digital SLR Camera Body & EF-S 18-55mm IS II Lens with 55-250mm IS Lens + 3 Here

Even though this kit contains stuff I'll probably never use, the price value is unbeatable. Love the T4i. Would recommend.

Want Canon EOS Rebel T4i Digital SLR Camera Body & EF-S 18-55mm IS II Lens with 55-250mm IS Lens + 3 Discount?

The camera is known for its greatness. and the additional components makes it even better, especially for the cost paid.

Saturday, March 29, 2014

Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III 21.1MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)

Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III 21.1MP Digital SLR CameraWell if you are looking at this fine piece of Photographic equipment odds are you have been to the Canon website and read the specs. I will touch on a few of the items I have noticed since I purchased mine and have been using it.

1st. The feel, just like the 1D M3, this beast is solid. Not too heavy, but solid in the hand. And here in Alaska, I do put the weather sealing to a test, and just like my trusty 1D M3, the 1Ds passes with flying colors.

2nd. Yes its 21.1 MP, but that should not be your main consideration to buy it. Yah 18x12 @ 300Dpi out of the Camera is nice, but nost people dont print over 16x20, and I have sold a lot of prints from my old 20D at that size or even upto 20x30, as long as you shoot it right in the first place. But this is also a drawback as well. Because of the large file size, esp in Raw, and most, if not all, buyers of this body will/should be shooting in raw, be aware that you will need larger CF cards for it. At least 8gig, I use 12Gig for mine, extreme 3's and they work great! Also be aware if you use the internal high iso noise processing, it slows down the buffering a lot!!!

3rd. Full Frame, just like the earlier 1Ds models its a ful frame sensor. That means 2 things, not only does a 17mm or 14mm lens again be a true wide angle lens, but also with the larger sensor the pixels are more refined and this gives better color and less grain.

4th. The colors of the images in the files. WOW Again the 14bit processors are great!!! Esp for raw, where you can import it in as 16bit for the finer details. One draw back is if you use Photoshop, you will need CS3 to do the raw Conversions, unless you use the Canon program.

5th. You are approaching the image quality of a Dig MF camera, with the portability of a Dslr! Not to mention you can use all the Canon EF lenses, and this camera really should only be used with L series lenses when possible, except for the fisheye as its not made in an L series but the quality is very good anyways. As the Quality of the optics is what affects the quality of the image the most, other than settings in the camera, ie shutterspeed and AV, ISO, etc...

6th. Wonderful Accesories for the camera. I love my wft-e2a. I use it on my 1D M3 a lot and it works great on the 1ds as well. Its a great way to control your camera remotely or to send your files to a remote computer for processing and such while you are still shooting.

This Camera is great. I have used the new nikon d3, and its a much improved camera over the past models, but it does not compare to the top of the line Canon!!!! This camera will not let you down. The noise if shot right is not even noticed until iso 1600 and then you still got to look. ISO 3200 is still great (about the same noise/grain my buddy had on his d200 at iso 400!!!!!)! If you are a Pro and need a camera that can perform the best and give wonderful results, this is it. It kicks butt compared to anything else in the DSLR market!!!

I owned this camera since spring of 2008,

So at the point of writing this review, I used it for nearly a year.

Now, if you are earlier owner, you might have experienced a problem or two.

I was unfortunately one of the owner experienced problem, and had to ship it back to Canon for the warranty repair. So, I was not exactly happy about paying expensive FEDEX freight.

But, rest assured, no other nasty problem occurred after warranty repair, and this camera has been workhorse of my photography.

Now, let get on the review.

This is really wonderful 21.1MP camera, and it is well worth the money.

But, you have to determine if you need to use one.

At the time of release, there were no other full size sensor camera with this resolutions.

Of course, it has been since passed by other manufacture... but I will not going to that comparison.

For Professional User.

Important thing about this camera is economics.

I own EOS 5D as well, and when non-commissioned or low paid project, I tend to bring 5D instead of 1DS MK3.

It is due to the fact, overall operational cost tend to be higher on the 1DS MK3 so if does not paid well, there will be no point to bring it out.

But, if it does paid well. there are enough justification to own this system, and you should used it as much as you can.

And this system is really reliable, once you get past some getting used to.

One more note,

Now I do own several different system including Hasselblad Medium format.

Medium Format Digital System is superior system when you are working in the control lighting environment. However, it is rather difficult to work with in the outside activity.

If you are studio photographer with magazine or commercial client, and do occasional out side shoot, you should own both medium format and this camera.

If you are professional just wondering about medium format and full size sensor camera,but without pressing need, then do not bother with medium format.

People who uses medium format digital normally has pressing reason such as satisfying client's specifications to own such system.

And it is not really versatile system no matter how medium format camera maker and digital back manufacture portray.

Canon 1DS MK3 is really versatile system, and it will satisfy most of design agency, publisher or stock photo agency's requirement, and L lens system are reasonably priced for the performance when looking at the economics.

For Semi Pro or High Amateurs User

For semi professional. 1DS MK3 is not going to make best economic argument, if you do not shoot studio.

If you are part time photographer who shoots mainly events or doing photo journalism.

I will recommend 1DMK3 over 1DSMK3.

Also, for photo journalist purpose, nowadays 5D MK2 actually makes a lot more sense than getting 1DS MK3 due to the their HD capability.

And for the photo journalist, it is not that good idea to carry bulky system.

But, for an amateur user with a lot of spending money,

It is one of the best system to get taste of what real pro are using.

And it does not cost like price of new BMW, and for the financially resourceful amateur, 7 to 8 grand may not be much of money.

When I got 1DS MK3 there were several amateur photographer I taught how to use this camera...

Surprising thing is, there are quiet many of amateur owner, and with very limited instruction to them,

They were able to create very good quality images.

So, kudos to the Canon for new 1DS MK3 interface.

It is actually easier for 1DS first timer than older 1DS MK2 for instance.

Of course, people who were used to with 1DS MK2 or older tend to disagree on this.

Now here are list of main advantage.

1. It is 21.1MP, more than most of commercial assignment requires.

2. Color depth of 14bit per channel is really useful for RAW work flow process.

3. Economical compared to the expensive medium format system, and still get comparable or sometimes superior result if conditions are right.

4. Build like tank, and it can take a quiet bit of abuse.

5. For user who are used to with 20D~50D, 5D MK1~MK2, it is really easy to learn interface.

6. Dust cleaning is really useful.

7. AF + Canon L Lens combinations is superior to the other known system in the market as of 2008-9

8. Liveview is useful to shoot architecture, land scape, and products.

9. RAW file format is supported well by the major commercial software.

10.CF slot and SDHC slot actually helps. It did not occurred to me until I run out of memory card on the locations, and had to run to the nearby local drug store. At least they carry cheap SD/SDHC at any large drug store chains, and it is a lot easier to find those store than locating nearby large electronic store...

11. Battery Life is excellent, it will easily cover half day events with nearly a thousand of picture even with taxing RAW + JPEG shoot.

12. Due to its weight and form factor, it is a lot easier to balance with long heavy lens.

13. When used with L lens, it is somewhat comparable with expensive medium format digital back.

14. Silent shutter mode is somewhat useful.

Now here are list of disadvantage.

1. It is slightly new form factor for Canon, and there are chance you had to send it to the warranty repair if you got the earlier production model.

2.There are something wrong with design of wireless port cap. It is relatively easy to lose one since it sometimes fell off with limited torque applied. I lost several of them already... though I stocked half dozen cap after I lost my first cap.

3. It is heavy and bulky. Thus some times not a ideal for certain situations.

4. Compared to Nikon D3X, it has slightly poor SNR on the third party software RAW processing software, so certain journalistic style shoot might suffer. If you shoot in the studio controlled lighting environment, that should not be a much of issue.

5. Many of RAW development software is actually more well tuned for Nikon, This might to be due to the amount of info Canon release to the third party software developer.

6. It is hard to justify its price for the many of users.

7. However everyone else claimed, it still can not replace medium format digital camera. Lens resolution and clarity of images is not there yet. Of course, that is when looking at 1:1 images side by side.

8. Silent shutter mode is not that quiet compared to some of the most quiet camera in the market. So, application such as close quarter Jazz or Classical music shot are still off the table.

Overall, I will recommend this camera to who,

If you are photographer that shoot tons of weddings at high fee structure, you should get one. Otherwise, EOS 5D nowadays makes very attractive choice.

If you are commercial photographer with clients and sufficient invest in Canon system, why are you waiting?

If you are amateur with deep pockets, this is a camera to get, and impress your photography teacher!

I will not recommend to someone,

Trek photographer who need lighter weight gear or those wild life photographer needs of faster fps should consider other offering from Canon.

Any journalistic style should consider 1D MK3 first unless you shoot tons of interview photo.

Shooting for hobby or fine arts purpose should really consider 5D mk2 before taking financial plunge of 1DS MK3

If you think it is heavy for you, do not get it. It will be too heavy for you after few hours of holding camera.

Buy Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III 21.1MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) Now

In every way Canon has done it again. This camera is lighter, faster, and produces bigger, better files than the mk2. If you make a living shooting pictures, buy it, you may never have to upgrade again. If Photography is your hobby or passion and you can afford it this should be your last camera.

My five favorite improvements in no particular order.

Faster and more accurate autofocus

Less noise at high ISO making 3200 a viable choice.

File quality that beats many 22MP medium format digital backs.

Live preview, it's cool, fun, and useful.

Improved handling due to lighter more balanced feel

Yes I know number three will get me in trouble but the price, faster handling, and much broader lens selection make it great choice in the 22 to 30MP range. The 39MP backs are clearly more detailed and smoother but this Canon will push many a P25 and H3D-22 onto ebay in the next year.

Canon has set the standard again the mk3 is truly brilliant. The only better deal may be the well cared for used mk2's easily found on ebay.

I just wanted to add a comment regarding cost. Now that my second mk2 has found a new home I can evaluate the true cost of an $8000.00 dslr. I paid $7300.00 each for my mk2s. Sold them for an average of $3620.00 making the cost if you add in an extra battery and firewire cables for three years around $4000.00 each. I anticipate this kind of return for the mk3s and considering they will work in a high demand professional environment for three years or so I'd say the mk3 is a ridiculous bargain.

By the way both of my mk3s have performed flawlessly and were spot on with regards to viewfinder alignment.

Read Best Reviews of Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III 21.1MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) Here

I've had the 1Ds Mark III for over a month now and have shot in churches, outdoors and in the studio. It excels in every environment. The first thing you'll notice is the immensely big, bright viewfinder. It barely feels like looking through something! The LCD display is very good as well. Build is very solid. I've used it with the Canon 85mm 1.2 II L and the Canon 70-200mm 2.8 IS L. Both deliver outstanding results and are hand-holdable. The new automatic dust-removal system is very good, leaving only a couple of spots against the blue sky when shot at small apertures, when there used to be countless on the 5D. Image quality is fantastic, and the images are huge, making cropping while retaining a big image easy. The menu system is very easy to operate, custom functions offer a plethora of options. Shutter sound is wonderful, and at 5fps very fast for 21MP. It's expensive for sure, but definitely worth it.

Want Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III 21.1MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) Discount?

Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III 21.1MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)

I am an advanced amateur and was using the 5D Mark I for the past 2.5 years. I loved the images but hated the focusing. In any kind of shot that involved focusing on a subject moving at walking speed, (or less) the 5D would fail to snap into focus. The second shot would never be in focus. In lower light situations (typical interior lighting, not candles), the 5D was even worse. Sometimes the focusing would force the lens to go to maximum close/distance as the 5D hunted for focus even when the lens was basically in focus to start this was guaranteed to miss the shot.

The 1Ds, on the other hand, is great at focusing. Super fast, subjects snap into focus quickly, and focusing continues onto 2nd shots and more. And it will focus on lenses that are 5.6 and above something the 5D did not do (try a telephoto with a filter or extender). From what I can read, the new 5D Mark II has basically the same focusing system so it is not improved in this area.

What kind of shots am I talking about? Shots of people,kids, basketball, soccer, bands, parades, candids on the street, street life, travel, animals in the wild or at home I would include most everything except still life/landscape photos. Generally any shot you would not be making with a tripod is a situation where the 1Ds' focusing is vastly superior to the 5D.

High resolution is great. But out of focus shots are not keepers.

Finally, the 1Ds Mark III is much more solid than the 5D everything from the controls to the shutter sound. I love this camera. My only wish is that it were the same size as the 5D since most shoulde camera bags don't account for its height. I don't mind the weight since the the weight of the lenses I am carrying is much heavier than the camera.

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Nikon Coolpix S70 12.1MP Digital Camera with 3.5-inch OLED Touch Screen and 5x Wide Angle Optical V

Nikon Coolpix S70 12.1MP Digital Camera with 3.5-inch OLED Touch Screen and 5x Wide Angle Optical Vibration Reduction ZoomI love everything about this camera, except.... it takes a terrible picture.

The good:

The form factor is great

I like the way you slide the cover to open the lens and turn the camera on. Makes turning on fast and easy.

The touch screen is great. Very easy to change settings. Screen is responsive. You can touch where you want to focus, which is really cool.

The ability to shoot in 16:9 ratio is nice, but you're limited to 8MP in that mode.

The Bad

This camera just wouldn't take a good picture. Outside in daylight I could get a pretty good photo, but anything indoors was poor at best. Even indoors during the day when there's decent light. After taking my first set of shots I assumed I must be doing something wrong, so I read the manual, tried all the different "scenes", I tried adjusting ISO, resolution, etc.

Granted, I'm a fairly novice user, so perhaps a more experienced pro could get a better picture out of this camera. I finally pulled out my old Canon SD200 3.2MP camera that I was looking to replace. I took many photos side by side. I never took the Canon off "auto" mode and I tweaked the Nikon a million ways. Virtually every time the Canon was sharper, and more color accurate.

So, I thouht maybe I got a bad camera. I went to Best Buy and tried their display model. You could see on the camera screen that the images just weren't that great. Maybe if I didn't have a side by side comparison it wouldn't have been so noticable, but I really expected this Nikon to be better than my very old Canon.

If anyone believes it's the operator and not the camera I'm more than open to advice, because I loved everything else about this camera. I did return it, but would buy it again if I found out it was just operator error, however, I really don't think it was my error.

The above reviewer hit the nail on the head, Great design, functionality, touchscreen is the only way to go...

But, the camera will not take a sharp photo. I took my card into the store and shot numerous people and signs at all iso's

and image styles and basically I got mush. I brought my card home and opened it in Photoshop and no amount of tweeking or sharpening could save these images. It boggles my mind that a company like Nikon will release such a camera.

Look for this $400 camera to be $125 by Christmas. Hint to Nikon, all the features in the world won't sell a camera if it won't take a decent image.

Buy Nikon Coolpix S70 12.1MP Digital Camera with 3.5-inch OLED Touch Screen and 5x Wide Angle Optical V Now

When I first read the specs on this camera I was very excited about getting my hands on it. I was especially interested in the OLED touch screen and the compact lens design. I went ahead and purchased the camera despite the mixed reviews it has received so far.

There are several problems with this camera. First, I took a number of shots both indoor and out on several settings and the picture quality is not very good. The pictures taken on my old 5 MP Minolta Dimage are far superior to this camera. Second, the design of the camera makes it almost completely unusable in normal shooting situations. The OLED screen takes up the entire back of the camera and is very touch sensitive. I found myself inadvertently activating functions without intending to. Also, the location of the lens is so close to the side of the camera my fingers continually ended up getting in the photo. So between the touchscreen and the lens location you end up with a continual camera holding balancing act that you can't win.

Overall a great feature set, but less than adequate picture quality and design. I returned it and purchased the Panasonic DMC-ZS3, and having now tried it out it beats the Nikon hands down.

Read Best Reviews of Nikon Coolpix S70 12.1MP Digital Camera with 3.5-inch OLED Touch Screen and 5x Wide Angle Optical V Here

The new S70 lives up to all of the Nikon claims. Like most Nikon cameras I have owned, it functioned perfectly right out of the box. Having been highly disappointed with the previous S60, this new S70 seems to have corrected all of the shortcomings of the S60 and much more. The new OLED touch screen is a joy to use sensitive and responsive. The screen visibility and clarity is excellent under all lighting conditions. Nikon also substituted a more robust battery which in combination with the OLED panel should extend camera use between charges.

Perhaps more important is the clarity and sharpness of the images taken with the S70. They are impressively sharp and clear under magnification. The menus are intuitive and easy to navigate. The touch screen focus and shutter release function is a nice touch. The simplified and enhanced in-camera cropping and retouch functions are well done and welcome additions. The Easy Auto mode handles very well all of the major camera settings and functions required for a good picture when a quick "point & shoot" situation arises. I would have preferred however an out-of-camera battery recharging system as I usually charge and carry a spare battery. I will be purchasing an external charger.

I have owned Nikon film and digital cameras for the last 25 years and I consider my new S70 to be a very worthwhile addition. It is stylish, functional, fun to use, and takes great photos. When you need a high quality pocket sized camera, you should take a close look at this one. I would highly recommend the S70.

Want Nikon Coolpix S70 12.1MP Digital Camera with 3.5-inch OLED Touch Screen and 5x Wide Angle Optical V Discount?

I have not tried the S70 yet (so disregard star rating) but I have noticed several reviews with frustrations about poor image quality. I also saw in the CNET Editor's review that they suggested that the user sets the Auto ISO limit to 80-200 for best results in most conditions and 80-400 max under difficult lighting conditions. Anyone who is experiencing photo quality issues might want to try that to see if it makes a big improvement. I expect that it will make a big difference since CNET said the pictures were "very good for a snapshot camera" once those settings have been changed. My guess is for some reason the camera is trying to use a ridiculously high ISO setting (1200-6400) and producing predictably grainier photos as a result. As Wikipedia explains regarding ISO speeds, "In both digital and film photography, the reduction of exposure corresponding to use of higher [ISO] sensitivities generally leads to reduced image quality (via coarser film grain or higher image noise of other types)." If that is in fact the problem it would still be a design flaw but one with perhaps a simple and very tolerable workaround.

From CNET:

"The photo quality from the S70 is very good for a snapshot camera...The camera lets you limit the auto ISO range to either 80-200 or 80-400. If you're in daylight or bright conditions, I recommend locking it down to 80-200. Again, it did perform well through ISO 400, but it's at its best below ISO 200."

Good luck with that workaround.

Also, anyone who has problems tapping the screen by accident should probably set the camera to only use the shutter button.

I still like the specs of this camera so plan to check it out at the local Best Buy with my own SD card and I will be playing with these settings and I will update my review once I have.

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Aqua - Vu Micro AV Underwater Camera System

Aqua - Vu Micro AV Underwater Camera SystemThis is a handy and very portable device that helps you better understand what is happening in the water. It is very simple to use....just turn on the monitor and start watching "the show". The camera takes good quality images and has a very wide field of view. Winding and unwinding the cable is easy to do due to its small diameter. Because of its size, the screen is not very big and under bright sun light, it is difficult to see any screen image so you need some kind of shade producer. If there is one capability that I would like to have added, it is the ability to send the image to a video recording device. Depending on water clarity, you will be able to see what a "fishfinder" is actually marking.

Friday, December 27, 2013

Apexis APM-J012-WS Wireless/Wired IP/Network Camera with 10 Meter Night Vision and 3.6mm Lens (67°

Apexis APM-J012-WS Wireless/Wired IP/Network Camera with 10 Meter Night Vision and 3.6mm Lens - WhiteI was really excited to find this camera as it provided all the features I was looking for with a very affordable price. I initially tested it out via a hard-wired ethernet connection and it worked flawlessly. Obtained an IP from my router easily and access to the camera server was quick/snappy. Picture quality was good in both low/no light as well as in full or medium light. Then I enabled the wireless and installed it in the room I wanted to monitor. Unfortunately this is when things broke down. While the wireless worked, it was definitely not speedy at all (I was utilizing WPA2 security). Accessing the initial camera menu was very slow, the picture was jittery/choppy, and the actual wireless connection would pretty much always drop after no more than 1 hours time. I double/triple checked the connection strength and confirmed there was a strong connection in its location.

After doing some additional research, I found other reviews online stating that this camera is known to be a bit buggy with its wireless connection. From what I can tell there is no known fix (yet) but suffice to say the wireless feature is pretty much not an option because of its lack of reliability.

I rated it a 3 because now that I have it connected via a wire, it is a great little device and the price is definitely right. If you have the ability to connect it via wire I'd recommend it. If wireless is a must have feature then I'd try another device as this one is just too buggy.

I bought this IP cam to keep an eye on my newborn on the upper floor. It's definitely working great, with a good resolution and image quality in the dark.

My only negative comment is that to get the sound, you need Internet Explorer as the whole interface is meant for Active X.

If you use Safari or Firefox, you'll only get the picture. So mac users, be careful, you'll only get part of the functions.

I tried to be a smart a... trying to run it through VLC at the http address but with no luck.

Except for the internet browser constraint, the camera does its job and at least has a cute design. I would definitely recommend it.

Buy Apexis APM-J012-WS Wireless/Wired IP/Network Camera with 10 Meter Night Vision and 3.6mm Lens (67° Now