Showing posts with label ip cameras. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ip cameras. Show all posts

Friday, October 24, 2014

Lorex Edge LH328501C4T22B 8-Channel DVR and 21.5-Inch Touch Screen Monitor with Internet, 3G Mobile

Lorex Edge LH328501C4T22B 8-Channel DVR and 21.5-Inch Touch Screen Monitor with Internet, 3G Mobile Viewing and 4 Security CamerasThe first unit failed within a few days. I thought it was just a fluke so I ordered another one and it failed within minutes. My suggestion is: If you buy this, set it all up on a table and let it run for a week or two before you go to the trouble of running cables and installing cameras.

I have another Lorex security system that works fine, which is why I bought this one. I just wanted to upgrade to the higher capacity touch screen.

Bought this system plus wireless cameras and it was awful. Wireless range was terrible, and half the wired cameras malfunctioned, no pic or sound. The lcd screen constantly froze. And to beat all when we had incident to show police, the memory wouldn't let us have it. Lost forever. Thanks a lot lorex....

Buy Lorex Edge LH328501C4T22B 8-Channel DVR and 21.5-Inch Touch Screen Monitor with Internet, 3G Mobile Now

Take away the touch screen aspect. Works perfect. If I didn't know it had a touch screen, I'd be real happy. However, the touch screen works only when it wants to, which isn't often. Both the monitor and the dvr have been replaced. Lorex can't figure it out.

The installer from InstallerNet can't figure it out. Then again, he mentioned it was just his 3rd install job of this system and complained he only got half of the $1,602 I paid to InstallNet to get him.

Read Best Reviews of Lorex Edge LH328501C4T22B 8-Channel DVR and 21.5-Inch Touch Screen Monitor with Internet, 3G Mobile Here

Mini DVI Male to HDMI Female Video Adapter Cable

Mini DVI Male to HDMI Female Video Adapter CableThis is not a Mini DVI it's a Mini Displayport there's a difference. If you have a white or black macbook such as myself, you're most likely going to need an actual Mini DVI adapter.

This adapter worked great for about a day. Then the color on my tv went bluish. My macbook screen's color is normal, but the color on the tv is wonky. If I jiggle the adapter a bit, I can get the color to come back, but as soon as I move it just the slightest bit, it goes back to the bluish color. Next time I'll spend a little more money for better quality.

Buy Mini DVI Male to HDMI Female Video Adapter Cable Now

I was searching for one that fits the my 2008 black macbook and it showed me the right one in the picture. But when i got the actual product it was the wrong one. VERY DISAPPOINTING...

Read Best Reviews of Mini DVI Male to HDMI Female Video Adapter Cable Here

I received my adapter today, and it was the wrong type. Not what I ordered. I tried it for my macbook (which looks just like the one in the picture) but it was blatantly not the one in the picture. Ridiculous.

Want Mini DVI Male to HDMI Female Video Adapter Cable Discount?

I've never bought anything on Amazon that broke after one use. This is a first for me. What did I expect for $2.30? The adapter worked once (perfectly) but on second try, it worked, then disconnected. Holding it in place would elicit a flicker from my TV every now and then, but then even that stopped working. This adapter is a piece of junk. Don't waste your time on it.

Save 70% Off

Sunday, October 19, 2014

HDMI Cable - 2 Male Connectors - 2 Meters

HDMI Cable - 2 Male Connectors - 2 MetersI bought this cable to go from my PS3 to my HD-TV. I was a little leery because it was sooo inexpensive. No need...this works just as it should, signal gets to the TV nice and clean with no issues at all. I have purchased other HDMI cable from retail store and the price for a 6' cable is always at least $20 and sometimes over $30. At under $5 you cannot go wrong with this. I cannot speak for it being capatible with the HMDI 1.3 since I have not tested it but for general HDMI use it is perfect.

Definitely the best way to go. I went to Best Buy, Radioshack, etc. and some cost $20+. Great product at a fraction of the cost.

Buy HDMI Cable - 2 Male Connectors - 2 Meters Now

Cables seem to work. Picture looks good, no flickering or anything, even though I've got a 24" monitor set to a pretty high resolution.

Read Best Reviews of HDMI Cable - 2 Male Connectors - 2 Meters Here

Don't be fooled by the price.

My cable stop working after one month. Just low quality product.

Want HDMI Cable - 2 Male Connectors - 2 Meters Discount?

Great product at a great price. The shipping was slightly faster than expecation as well.

Friday, October 10, 2014

Cctv Security Dome Camera, 700 Tvl, High Resolution, 2.8-12mm Lens, 1/3" Color Ccd, 36 Leds. For In

Cctv Security Dome Camera, 700 Tvl, High Resolution, 2.8-12mm Lens, 1/3' Color Ccd, 36 Leds. For Indoor/outdoor Use, Free 1amp Power Adapter IncludedThe output from the camera is very clear. The color output during the day is very accurate and the night time ir viewing is clear and provides a very large coverage area. I will be purchasing a second one to monitor the front door and would recomend it to a friend.

Terrible color representation. Any dark color appeared some variation of green. I have 480tvl cameras that have a better picture than this camera.

Buy Cctv Security Dome Camera, 700 Tvl, High Resolution, 2.8-12mm Lens, 1/3" Color Ccd, 36 Leds. For In Now

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Nikon Coolpix L14 7.1MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom (Blue)

Nikon Coolpix L14 7.1MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical ZoomI've been toying with the idea of getting a digital for years but I wasn't sold on the picture quality, (without spending a great deal of money) and I'm frankly a film snob. I have a vintage Fuji SLR and a Canon Photura which both produce great shots but are cumbersome to chase the kids around with. I wanted something easy to set, with minimal buttons so my kids could use it as well, but with a quality worth printing at least a 5x7 with. The specs are well detailed in the description so I'll just go general. I found the camera very intuitive. I haven't looked at the manual but all the modes are easy to figure out by the 'press a button and see what happens' method. Editing on the fly is quick and easy, the video I took looks as good as a minidv tape, the pictures blow up well. It fits in my front jean pocket or in a small matching Samsonite hardcase I found for $4. With a 2 GB card I can do 30 minutes of video or about a thousand pictures. This camera is advertised as long life batteries and so far I've done about 200 photos and 15 minutes of video on the supplied batteries. One negative is the shutter time when using flash mode it is s-l-o-w. You can't catch something quickly, you're going to get three or five seconds after you think you are. However, turning the flash off made this shutter as fast as my Photura, (if not as fast as my SLR) but still had a lag time between shots. It's a trade I can live with since the multiple exposure settings make it easy to compensate for not using the flash. The design is excellent. I'm left handed and a lot of things designed for one handed use annoy me by placing buttons where a left handed user will hit the wrong ones. Although there are three buttons on the top of the camera, I had no problem at all with this. The kids are very interested in the stop motion feature. While I got this as a snap shot camera for my own use, it would be an excellent choice for an 8 year old's first camera. I spent a long time (about a year) choosing between a Nikon, Canon or Kodak model. I think the Nikon was the right way to go for ease of use, results, and visual styling. Couldn't be happier with it.

I'll start by saying that this is a GREAT, maximum bang-per-buck 'point-and-shoot' compact digital camera. I conducted a LOT of research before I decided on the 'Coolpix L14', and it is one of my best purchases ever. I've been using an old Fujifilm 'Finepix 2650' (2 megapixel) for a few years now, and it's served me well. I wanted a more compact, simple to use and intuitive brand-name (like Nikon, Canon, Sony, etc.) digital cam that took high quality pictures in 'auto mode', and still had some advanced features and options that I could use in a 'manual mode' for even more control of the shot. I also wanted a camera that would use both 'AA' batteries, and high-capacity rechargeable 'AA' batteries, if I so choose. This camera takes both, and the batteries last a lot longer than many other cameras that I researched (Nikon claims about 1,000 shots with 'Energizer e2' lithium batteries), owned, or borrowed. The LCD screen looks sharp and crisp as well, and I like the 'face finding' and 'red eye fix' technology too, and they both work quite well. In addition, I tested it's video abilities as well, and the audio/video look and sound seamless, although you really need to get a 2GB card to get any meaningful length video out of this cam. The pic transfer software also works perfectly with my Windows XP PC, with no glitches. In summation, for the price, this cam is a truly GREAT buy, and it looks GORGEOUS in blue too (classy, expensive look)! Hope this review is helpful.

Buy Nikon Coolpix L14 7.1MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom (Blue) Now

I just recently purchased this camera, and after using it for only 5 days I have decided to return it primarily because the image quality is very poor. The images are soft and washed out, not sharp and crisp like I have come to expect from Nikon (I have the D80 as well). The menu system is very primitive but it is still functional. The only good thing about this camera is its very low price. But, I feel that this camera is a bad value, even at this price. I have decided to pay 50% more and buy the Canon SD1000. The images from my old SD230 (3 megapixels) were much better than with this new Nikon (7 megapixels).

The Good:

low price

light and small

takes AA batteries

The Bad:

-soft pictures

-washed out color and general haziness of images

-very long delay between pictures (especially with the flash)

Read Best Reviews of Nikon Coolpix L14 7.1MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom (Blue) Here

The best thing about this camera is its video capabilities. Full screen, 640x480 video with good color and low light performance. You MUST add at least a 2gb card to take advantage of the video options.

Want Nikon Coolpix L14 7.1MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom (Blue) Discount?

My experience was much the same as TechnoGeek's. Almost every picture I took was blurry. Outdoors it takes fairly decent shots, but indoors it is extremely finicky. I poured over the manual and tried every combination of settings, but I could not get the camera to take consistently clean pictures. The action settings seemed to have no effect. Just taking a still photograph indoors with the flash usually came out blurry. The manual even warns not to press the button too hard, saying otherwise pictures could come out blurry. (!) With the flash was always better than without, but at no point could the pics hold up against a family member's Olympus FE 180. Worse still was how slow the camera responded, taking 3-7 seconds to save a picture. The voice recorder would have been a very useful option had the camera taken decent pictures.

Monday, September 15, 2014

LCDVF Digital LCD Viewfinder for Digital SLR Cameras with 3'' Screens

LCDVF Digital LCD Viewfinder for Digital SLR Cameras with 3'' ScreensI'd recently purchased a Canon T2i digital SLR with the almost sole purpose of shooting video, but I also use it as my primary camera for still photography. When shooting HD video with this batch of Canon DSLRs the viewfinder is blocked and the only option for seeing what you're shooting is the LCD screen, which is hardly ideal for manual focus. I'd read all the reviews of the three top contenders: the Zacuto Z-finders, this LCDVF, and the Hoodman Hoodloupe 3.0. Zacuto was way out of my price range for what's essentially a good magnifying glass in a nice holder. Hoodman would've been a real option if they had a useable way to mount it to an T2i, which has an LCD screen offset to the left-bottom corner of the camera, not centered as on other models that the Hoodman was designed for. So in the end, I decided to go with the LCDVF and I'm very glad I did.

I've found the magnification on the LCDVF to be fantastic with my T2i's LCD screen when manually focusing. At 200% magnification it enlarges the image just enough that you can clearly see what's in and out of focus and you can just start to distinguish individual pixels on your screen. If it were magnified anymore, it might look nicer because it's a "bigger" picture, but it's only because the individual pixels are bigger, and seeing more of each pixel won't help me know if the picture is in focus or not. The only reason you would really need magnification of more than 2x is if your camera's LCD is a higher resolution than the T2i's (1,040,000 dots). Furthermore, the physical size of the LCDVF is great. As opposed to the bulky size of the cube-shaped Zacutos, the 5 inch long LCDVF tapers down from the end to the eyepiece, making it appear somewhat smaller when attached to the camera.

As for attaching to the camera itself, this is where things get a bit sticky. The LCDVF comes with 2 frames (you only need 1 frame, the extra's a spare) with adhesive on one side requiring you to attach a "permanent" frame to your camera's LCD. It's a tiny bit on the small side, as it just barely covers the dimensions of the LCD screen (be careful when attaching it). Once attached, this metal frame holds the magnetized end of the viewfinder. What? Magnets and electronics? How can this be?! The manufacturers ensure that while the magnets are strong enough to securely hold the viewfinder to the frame, they are not strong enough to mess with any of the gizmos within your camera (although they do recommend taking if off when not using the camera.

The ONLY negative I can find with this product when compared with other models is that there is no diopter. The Zacuto and Hoodman viewfinders have diopters built in to adjust focus for folks who wear glasses. However, if you're nearsighted or wear contacts like myself then you shouldn't need a diopter at all.

I'd definitely recommend this for anyone who has bought a DSLR for shooting video through a 3" LCD screen, it really clarifies the image and is a great tool for pulling focus. And at about half the price of a Zacuto, it's a relative bargain and a fine alternative.

Ordered this for my 7D after a night of trials and tribulations attempting to find focus using the naked LCD. You need an LCD viewfinder. This one attaches the mounting frame to the camera back with an adhesive. The view finder has magnets in the plastic frame. This means you do not need different frames if you use a battery grip and extended frames are not cheap. Also. it gets a little crowded around the tripod hole with other "necessary attachments". I loved this for my first day of shooting. The second day was hotter, about one hour in the adhesive let go and instead of the frame remaining attached to the viewfinder body, it hit the beach sticky side down of course. This made the rest of the day miserable and it got cut short. I've attached my second frame, but I have no doubt that the first incident will repeat itself at another critical time. I intend to keep experimenting with automotive/marine quality adhesives until I get one that works.

Buy LCDVF Digital LCD Viewfinder for Digital SLR Cameras with 3'' Screens Now

This is a great product! I did not have any issue mounting the adhesive ring and its on there GOOD! I think the ones that are having issues with the mount ring are not getting the natural skin oils off the LCD screen before they mount it or are possibly touching the sticky side of the ring while mounting it. I cleaned mine real well first with some liquid dish soap on a soft damp towel and then rinsed and dried it real well. I also put my camera lens side down and set a large soup can on the ring (for a weight) overnight. Trust me Mine is STUCK ON GOOD! Optics are also great and are well made to give you a full view of the LCD screen enlarged to its max without cutting out the corners. I love it and would highly recommend!

Read Best Reviews of LCDVF Digital LCD Viewfinder for Digital SLR Cameras with 3'' Screens Here

After much deliberation over the three top contenders, I couldn't pull the trigger on the 375.00 Zacuto ZFinder. It just seemed like too much to pay for an engineered magnifying glass. I also couldn't really take the Loupe serious, what with the rubber bands and all. I decided on the LCDVF, even though my first impression was that I wouldn't want to glue something "permanent" to the back of my 7D. It seemed there were also a fair amount of comments about the adhesion reliability of the frame as well.

I received my order in 48 hours and was ready to apply my frame. I took care, as was mentioned in several reviews, to clean the area well with a mild soap and damp cloth. I then used a micro cloth to clean any residue. You'll want to take a moment to line up your frame over a brightly lit screen such as a menu to assure where you want to place it. Peel off the adhesive strip being careful to keep your finger oils off the adhesive area. Apply the frame and apply pressure with your thumb pads all around the perimeter. Now turn your camera lens down and set it on your counter. Find an appropriate size canned good to add weight to the frame. I used a Campbell's soup can against the frame, and then added another larger can on top of that.

After leaving it for several hours I was ready for a test drive. The first thing I can tell you is I think it would take a lot to knock this frame loose. I was impressed with the adhesion and would trust it. The second thing I noticed disappointedly, was that because there is no diopter setting, this viewfinder is not usable for anyone wearing corrective eyeglasses for reading. I finally figured out that for my eyes wearing my glasses, I needed to hold the viewfinder several inches back from the LCD screen on the back of my camera to get what was then a very clear, beautiful image. I don't want to give this product a black eye and say anyone with eyeglasses will have this trouble, but it sure wouldn't work for my eyes. I wish that some of the other reviews had mentioned this. I didn't take the lack of a diopter adjustment serious enough.

I decided to return the item, which Amazon does makes easy. And of course I know that I'm going to need to go for the Zacuto for the diopter, but I still need some time to digest that price. If your eyes are unencumbered with age related problems, then I think this item would be an excellent choice. If they could work a diopter into this product, then I would give it five stars.

Want LCDVF Digital LCD Viewfinder for Digital SLR Cameras with 3'' Screens Discount?

It's a good concept and the foam cushion over the eyecup is a nice touch; but after using it once on my 5D Mii the adhesive came loose and the intermediate frame between the LCD and the magnet lost its bond. I contacted the manufacturer and requested more glue. They said they would send some but never did, even after follow up! The kit comes with two frames but I'm using the other frame on my other camera (7D). So, this is very inconvenient, especially since I exactly followed the manufacturer's instructions for adhering the frame to the LCD. I don't know what kind of adhesive I should use now to glue it back on. It also lacks a diopter; so if you wear glasses this will be problem. It was a fairly good product and at a lower price that the Z-Finder but alas the glue was weak! Another reviewer had the exact same problem I had. Obviously they haven't worked out this problem.

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Panasonic HDC-SD100 Flash Memory High Definition Camcorder with 12x Optical Zoom

Panasonic HDC-SD100 Flash Memory High Definition Camcorder with 12x Optical ZoomI was worried about having to convert the compressed files from the memory card into editable files for FCP. Using Voltaic, I was able to make the conversion easily. The camera is so light, you hardly know its in your hand. The deciding factor in chosing this camera is that it has a view finder an important feature for close work. I love being able to shoot for long periods and not having to worry about changing tapes. It may not be the best (technically) HD camcorder out there, but for the price, it is great for most every situation.

This is a fantastic lightweight camera. I don't know the story behind current pricing but I paid $530 for my camera.

Pros: The camera makes high definition video and you can choose between 1920, 1080, or 720. Most video I take is at the highest resolution. The camera can take still images. You can choose between recording with the view finder or the LCD screen. The sound recording is incredible for little camera with no external mounted microphones. Choose between recording sound in front of you or in 5.1 surround sound. My discovery is that surround sound picks up too much background noise such as cheering parents at soccer games.

Cons: My photo graphs are at a lower resolution than I would like and it takes a long time for the camera to focus and set. The battery needs much more juice and I am currently shopping on Amazon for a new one. The camera has been used on the field during softball games where dust is an issue and now the automatic lens cap is sticking and I have been unable to fix it. Video management!!! Did I know what I was getting into? No. I have recorded hours of family vacations, softball, and soccer games. The purchase of this camera has led me to buying seven terrabytes of disk storage, a blue ray disk burner and different brands of DVD and Blue Ray media. My concern is long term storage of my newly recorded video. What to do? DVD's don't last and Blue Ray can be even less reliable over time. My goal is to not let my video disappear like the old Super 8 video from my youth and the VHS from recent history. How can I safely store video?

Video editing: Roxio was the most unstable program I have ever used. Period! Don't buy it. I have had great success using Cyberlink Power Director Ultra 8. I no long have Panasonic's video capture program installed. I believe Panasonic's video capture program was called HD Writer. I could not figure it out and it seemed cubersome to use. Two thumbs down.

Bottom line is Yes this is a great camera.

Buy Panasonic HDC-SD100 Flash Memory High Definition Camcorder with 12x Optical Zoom Now

Excellent camera... very compact with good image quality. Love the high definition and its perfect for home movies! I would recommend this camera to anyone, unless you have really big hands. It might be a little cumbersome to turn the recording on and off with your thumb if your hands are big.

Read Best Reviews of Panasonic HDC-SD100 Flash Memory High Definition Camcorder with 12x Optical Zoom Here

This handy flash camera does everything advertised. The video is smooth with vivid colors. Although not as small as the Canon SF200, this camera is large enough for the average sized hand to get a good grip and keep a steady shot. This Panasonic is one of the few camcorders in this price range with an EVF, a feature which I prefer to use. For those who like a bit of manual control, Panasonic's implementation is very intuitive. Like any other AVCHD camcorder, you will need good software to render the video. The HD writer software that came with the camera is adequate, but Apple's iMovie, or products from Pinnacle and Adobe are better.

Want Panasonic HDC-SD100 Flash Memory High Definition Camcorder with 12x Optical Zoom Discount?

I own this and recorded music video using the panasonic and a sony ex1 you can see the results (When sonny gets Blue) The ex1 is a camera the hdc sd100 was not as good but for the 10xless price it held its own. I needed to tweek the final video with sony vegas but I was pleased. I love the manual settings. the color is very good, the only downside was low light performance so I purchased some sima 20xls.

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Samsung HMX-U20 Ultra-Compact Full-HD Camcorder (Silver)

Samsung HMX-U20 Ultra-Compact Full-HD CamcorderWe purchased this camcorder to record of the birth of our twins (they are still in the oven:), and were excited to test it once it arrived. We love the size of it, so compact and easy to carry around, unlike my previous camcorders. The quality is pretty good, the only thing is when you zoom in and out, the audio makes the clicking noise. We purchased a 32G SDHC for it so we didn't have that many problems mentioned in other reviews. We've made some test shots and videos and edited it, a real cool feature is while you are filming a video you can take pictures. Here is a test movie you can view on YouTube:Overall, we are happy with this little camcorder with its price!

I should have paid attention to all the reviews. Yes, there is something WRONG with this camcorder. It has this annoying clicking sound on playback. Unfortunately, authorized Samsung service centers here in Australia don't even know what HMX-U20 is, so they can't do anything about it. What I total waste... I bought another mini camcorder from another brand, which I am quite happy about. Don't buy this product unless you've read better reviews.

Buy Samsung HMX-U20 Ultra-Compact Full-HD Camcorder (Silver) Now

This little video camera works like a dream. It even does well when riding in a car and filming. The only thing that would be better is if the controls were a bit easier to operate. I have to keep looking back at the manual to work it. For the dollar, I definitely give this a thumbs up.

Read Best Reviews of Samsung HMX-U20 Ultra-Compact Full-HD Camcorder (Silver) Here

Nice design, very compact, and light weight... and that would be the end of what I like about it. The camera is sub-par. The motion stabilization is ineffective. Low light is atrocious. Software was clearly an afterthought. Battery life is bad. Video is classified as HD but one of the worst actual pictures I've seen to date. Not impressed Samsung; back to the drawing board.

Want Samsung HMX-U20 Ultra-Compact Full-HD Camcorder (Silver) Discount?

I received this for Christmas. The specs on this this camera are great. Unfortunately the video recording quality is terrible. The images have the detail, but it looks like there is a film or noise over the entire image. The recording looks no better than our HI-8 SD recorder. Very disappointed. All the features function correctly, such as output via HDMI to a TV set. Also the video screen on the back has a very limited viewing angle. Will be returning for a refund.

Save 46% Off

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR CamerasI have owned at one point or another all Canon's 70-200mm's with exception of the f/2.8 non-IS, along with a decent amount of other Canon L glass. Hence this review will be from the perspective of someone who may be deciding whether or not to add this piece of glass to their matured L collection or someone who is deciding on this lens versus another 70-200mm. If you are instead someone who has already decided on this lens and is looking for one last push to click the buy button, consider this, and the 25 reviews below it, as your green light.

First up, let's talk about the obvious good. This lens carries with it the most advanced IS drive to date, yielding an incredible 4-stops of stabilization. In real life, it is infact four full stops of stabilization. No kidding. For non-moving subjects, this lens becomes an effective 70-200mm f/1.4 as far as handholdability is concerned. When there is subject movement, however, realize that f/4 is still your true aperture and motion blur will be inherent.

As for the not-so-obvious good, this 70-200mm version has the highest image quality out of any of the other 70-200mm's. CA, vignetting, and sharpness is the best with this lens. Lens weight and balance is also the best in comparison to what it offers: it's only slightly heavier than the f/4 with all that IS goodness and not even close to as heavy as the f/2.8 IS with it's one-stop advantage.

The Bad. I always try to find something I dislike with each lens. For some L lenses, it gets tough and I have to get picky, such as with the 135mm f/2L or the 180mm F/3.5L. This lens sits in that catagory. I would have to say I dislike the non-petal shaped lens hood. Yep. That's about it. Wish I could say more here. For the price, this really is a superior buy.

Let's do some comparing.

Against the 70-200mm f/4L: The 'baby' of the 70-200mm line, it's half the price. So is the IS drive worth the ~500 bucks? Well to answer that question, you must realize the limitation of f/4. F/4 usually means sharp glass that's lightweight and cheap, of good value. But it also means more than enough light for sunny days, but never enough for cloudy days, indoors, just after dusk, just before sunrise, during inclement whether, or any other time when shooting conditions are optimal for great pictures. So do you plan on using this lens without a tripod (or flash) ever during these times? If you answer yes (even if you didn't, you will), you might become frustrated with the f/4 non-IS version over time and seek to upgrade, or continuously pack a tripod for which you will also need to buy the lens tripod ring. (Do realize however, that neither the f/4 non-IS or the f/4 IS will serve you well when it comes to indoor action. For that, you'll have to move up the chain to the f/2.8.) From my personal experience, the f/4 IS also delivers an increased dynamic range near the highlights, slightly more saturation, and slightly less CA in comparison to the f/4 non-IS.

The f/2.8L non-IS: I have never owned this lens, so I can only speak by stats and offer a little limited advice. They are both nearly equal in price, so let's talk about the differences. The f/2.8 is built better (more metal and sealing) and comes with a tripod ring (plus that envious petal-shaped hood). It shares the weather sealed mount and near-equal image quality (the f/4 IS is slight sharper). And you of course gain a stop in aperture but lose IS. So which is better? Since stat-wise they are so close, I would ask what your intentions are. Are you primarily a landscape photographer or an event photographer? More pictures of your kids or more of slow-moving objects. Both lenses do low-light well, it's just that if your shots have little moving in them, you are much better off with the f/4 and to use a flash when the shots do include movement. If your shots almost always include a lot of movement, go with the f/2.8 (but you should really consider the f/2.8 IS).

The f/2.8 IS. The moving versus non-moving distinction is so important that I actually ended up owning BOTH the f/2.8 IS and the f/4 IS. Why? Because the f/2.8 IS is the strongest contender for low-light event work out of the 70-200 line, yet offers the worst in image quality. The image quality difference between the f/4 and the f/2.8 is nothing short of significant. You simply do not use the f/2.8 to generate fine art as it's image quality does not allow it (in my spoiled rotten opinion. In fact, until the f/4 IS came along, I didn't think any of the 70-200's were suitable for this task.) So I utilize the f/2.8 for event work and the f/4 for everything else I need a 70-200mm zoom for. As a side note, the f/2.8 maintains a 3 stop IS drive while the f/4 maintains a 4 stop drive. This means both lenses maintain the same effective 70-200mm f/1.4 aperture. Add all this up, and my recommendation is to go with the 70-200mm f/4 IS and save ~$550 unless you are a professional wedding, model, or event photographer, or if you consistently shoot family or moving objects in low light.

Another comparison: the 135mm f/2L. Roughly the same price, this lens maintains an ultra fast aperture with superior image quality at a loss of versatility. The 70-200mm f/4 IS behaves better with the 1.4x extender. These two lenses tie a lot when it comes to choosing a lens to pack. Basically, if I know exactly the type of shooting environment I'll be walking into (that maintains room for sneaker zooming) and recognize the need for superior bokeh, maximum image quality, or fast shutter speeds, then the 135 it is. Otherwise, I'll pack the 70-200 f/4 IS. If you are deciding between this lens and the 135 for purchase, choose the 135 if your main intention is for portraiture, still life, or low-light arena photography (football, moster trucks, tennis, etc).

The 70-200mm F/4 IS is basically your go-to lens for day hikes, airshows (with 1.4x extender, or unless you own a 300mm f/4 or better), fireworks, any landscaping in low (and therefore good) light, and anything else in which your camera will act as if it's been secured to a tripod while you take a 4-stop stabilized shot.

Due to it's heavy usage as a landscape lens, I have attached a B+W polarizer (67mm filter size) and just left it on. I advise using only the best filters for this lens, don't ruin its image quality with some el cheapo filter.

Other:

-The exterior casing from the zoom ring back to the mount is actually hard plastic. It still feels nice and reduces the weight. The rest of the lens exterior is the typical L-grade metal.

-The lens does not come with a nice case. A Lowepro 4s case is recommended.

-The IS drive is one of the quietest I've heard yet. Almost silent.

Conclusion: An absolute great value as far as L glass goes. A joy to use for photographers new to IS and an attraction for professionals dissapointed with the image quality and weight of the 70-200mm F/2.8 IS, whom may be looking to round out their event photography with landscape work. If you are completely unsure of what you might run into in the field and need the most general setup you can achieve, packing this lens with the 24-70mm or the 24-105mm is all you need.

With over 100 lenses produced for Canon EOS system, finding the right lenses can overwhelm even the experienced photographers. My search for walkaround lens took over two months of research and auditioning. After choosing Canon's EF 17-40mm f/4L USM as a walkaround lens and EF 50mm f/1.4 USM as a portrait lens, my attention shifted toward telephoto. A bit of background info. My current DSLR body is Digital Rebel XTi (EOS 400D). I plan on upgrading to full frame DSLR body next, so I only look at EF lenses (no EF-S) with solid build quality (it needs to be around to serve the next camera).

At first, finding a telephoto lens seemed almost as easy as portrait lens. Professional reviewers alike hail EF 70-200mm f/4L USM for top-notch build quality and superb optical performance at a reasonable price. (EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM and EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM are too heavy, large, and expensive for my needs.) 70-200mm focal range is just about ideal for me, which becomes 112-320mm in 35mm print format. I took many fantastic pictures with it, but quickly found a problem. Without a tripod, telephoto isn't easy to shoot. With 17-40mm lens, I can take well-focused images shot after shot. Even under challenging light, I can hit fairly high percentage of photos without flash. At 200mm, situations get considerably trickier. Under very good lighting, I can take one great looking photo after another. Under somewhat limited light, however, I found myself with rather high percentage of out-of-focus photos. Increasing the ISO speed helped a good deal, but even that has a limit. Eventually, I found myself depending on the tripod for reliable results.

Then I saw EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM. At nearly twice the price tag, I was very reluctant at first. Then I was given the opportunity to play with it in person. To my surprise, it weighs and sized about the same as non-IS counterpart. And it has super-state-of-the-art 4-stop (!) image stabilizer with panning mode and tripod detection. After selling EF 70-200mm f/4L USM at a minimal loss (L-series lenses tend to have very high resale value), I saved up for IS.

Weighing in at 1.68 lbs., it is only slightly heavier than non-IS and about half as heavy as f/2.8 counterparts. At 3" width and 6.8" length, it is also considerably smaller than f/2.8. Even on comparatively small Digital Rebel XTi, it does not feel entirely out of place. Thanks to inner focus, the lens does not extend nor rotate during focusing or zooming. It stays at 6.8" at all time. As to be expected, its ring-type USM with full-time manual override is silky smooth and fast. Simply a pleasure to use.

The lens has 4 switches, (1) focus limiter (sets minimum focus distance of 1.2m or 3m... a bit far in my opinion, but then again, this is a telephoto lens), (2) auto/manual focus, (3) image stabilizer, and (4) stabilizer mode (regular mode 1 or panning mode 2). The image stabilizer is simply fantastic. As with other image stabilizer, it is not effective at stopping subject in motion. Once IS is switched on, it kicks in with a satisfying click when you press the shutter button half way. Click all the way and you may be able to say goodbye (at least see you later) to tripod.

So how does it perform? The sharpness is simply amazing, almost as sharp as my benchmark EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens from center-to-edge. All in all, images were even better than non-IS counterpart, with smooth and more vibrant color, no noticeble barrel distortion, vignetting, nor chroma aberrations.

Also noteworthy is new circular aperture blades (8 of them), creating prettiest blur effects (bokeh) you will ever see. Thanks to Super Spectra coatings, it is even better at suppressing flare than non-IS and f/2.8 counterparts. Simply put, this is one of the most state-of-the-art zoom lenses Canon has produced.

As with other L-series lenses, it comes with a carrying pouch and a lens hood. It accepts 67mm filters.

Pros:

4-stop image stabilizer.

Not too heavy. Not too large.

Amazing build quality.

Great image quality with very nice bokeh.

Top-notch focus mechanism.

Cons:

Expensive.

IS will use more battery.

f/4 aperture may not be fast enough for some.

Buy Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras Now

Like used Honda's and Acura's, this Canon lens is destined to command a high resale dollar.

I traded in my Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM lens for this new lens. The colour of this lens is a slightly darker off-white (almost gray-white) than the non-IS version. So, if you have an older Canon Tripod Mount Ring A (W), you may see a slight colour mismatch. Personally, not a big deal by any means. The instruction manual illustrates and refers to their new Canon Ring-Type Tripod Mounting Socket A II (W) which I have not seen in colour to see if it is an exact colour match for this lens.

Mated to my tripod mounted Canon Digital Rebel XT set at ISO 100, the lens appeared sharper than the non IS version from f/4 through to f/18 for the majority of it's focal length. For this particular lens, optimum images were obtained at f/7.1 at 70mm and f/9 at the other focal lengths.

Flare is better controlled than the non IS version.

Bokeh has improved with the new round eight aperture leaves.

Colour and contrast have dramatically improved with the new UD glass.

With the Image Stabilization (IS) activated on Mode 1, there were more useable images taken at 4 stops below the usual minimum recommended settings at all focal lengths.

According to Canon Canada, the IS DOES NOT automatically shut off like Canon's EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM, Super Telephoto and Diffractive Optic lenses. But, the battery will continue to drain while the IS is on as per the instruction manual.

Because I could not find any third party substitutes, I recommend purchasing their expensive Canon tripod collars in either white or black. It optimally structurally stabilizes the lens/camera assembly. For weight reduction, you can always remove the collar.

This lens and the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM lens mounted on my Canon 5D is all I need to capture almost all of my images.

A word of caution: check each lens for foreign particles between the front and adjacent lens elements. I saw one lens with a large piece of something stuck onto the element immediately behind the front element.

UPDATE (13-July-2007): Please see my sample photos with this lens taken af F4.0 with the IS activated. This zoom lens is even better than my trusty old Nikkor AF-D 80-200 F2.8 IF-ED!

Read Best Reviews of Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras Here

I owned the 70-200 f/4L for two years and loved it sharp, contrasty, almost a perfect lens. But, I started to shoot night HS football and it was coming up short. I needed speed. So I sold the f/4 and bought the f/2.8. I ran some testing with both before I sold the f/4 and they were pretty evenly matched except for 1) price the f/2.8 cost 2X, weighed 2X, and was a full stop faster. But it was too heavy to carry around. I found myself looking for excuses to not carry it. Trust me, it is big and heavy. So, recently I picked up the 70-200f/4 IS. The IS on this lens is unbelievable. Even with the 1.4X teleconverter, at 280mm, I can hand hold it at 1/15th of a second. This is a miracle. It is supersharp, super contrast, and extremely light and hand holdable. It is the lens that dreams are made of. Most issues in low light are due to hand shake, not subject movement, especially with a telephoto. Expensive, well, yes. But a keeper.

Want Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras Discount?

I'm a semi-professional photographer, mostly dealing with landscape and portrait photography. After using this lens, my first thought was the truthfulness of reviews, made by the trusted sites such as dpreview. I've used many brands such as sigma, tamron as well as various canon lenses. This is the best one I've ever used in many ways.

I won't make detailed comparisons but FYI this lens beats my favorite "24-105 f/4 L IS" in sharpness. I made some test shots by using both lenses on a tripod, using various focal distances and aperture values. Colors, saturation and contrast levels seemed nearly indifferent to me but 70-200's sharpness was incredible. In one of the reviews it was mentioned that "70-200 acts like a prime lens in every focal distance" and that's true in my opinion.

Many reviews effectively and truthfully acknowledged the pros of this lens. IMO the most crucial issue is deciding on the "relevance" of this lens for your needs. Here's what I think;

1) Don't hesitate to spend extra money for the IS feature. It is a vital feature (especially for a telephoto lens) in lowlight situations. I was able to get pretty good handheld shots above 100 mm. with low shutter speeds such as 1/30.

2) Remember that bokeh (background blur) will be a problem in some situations considering the minimum aperture value of f/4. You will not be able to abstract your subject effectively from a complicated background in some shooting situations or focal distances. Additionally, minimum aperture value renders this lens slow for action photography especially in low light situations. If you care about those, go for 70-200 f/2.8. Heavier, pricey but speedy and great bokeh even the subject is not too far from the background. While deciding I used my vote for less weight and smaller size since I have to walk a lot with 4 lenses and 2 bodies.

3) IMO this is not a suitable lens for wildlife photography even if you use extenders. Without extenders, you have to get close to animals so that you can scare them or put yourself into danger. Considering this lens' sharpness, cropping with a minimum loss might be an option. On the other hand, if you are using extenders (especially 2x) you will concede from sharpness as well as higher shutter speeds to a significant level. 2x extender was totally a disappointment for me.

4)This might seem unimportant to some but it is an important asset for me; this lens does not rotate or extend while focusing and zooming. I frequently use polarization filters in landscape photography, thus the filter does not rotate while focusing. Besides, I'm free to hold the lens wherever I want while shooting since it does not extend. More important, an extending lens generally means loss of light, while the light passes through the lens. Simply because the distance between the optics and sensor increase. Therefore, in many lowlight situations (if you are dealing with stable subjects) this lens will give you what you want.

To sum up, this is the best lens I've ever had. If you think that the issues I mentioned above won't restrict your photography, then DON'T THINK TWICE.

Monday, November 18, 2013

ProAm 7" On-Camera LCD Video Monitor Kit with RCA AV Inputs

ProAm 7' On-Camera LCD Video Monitor Kit with RCA AV InputsI'm a portrait photographer but do video in my spare time. I bought this monitor to use for setting up shots and it's great to have the large screen to do that. Compared to my 7D's small 3" screen, it's much easier on my old eyes... Connecting to the camera is pretty straightforward, the cables connect directly to my 7D's AV cable. Note that this is not an HDMI monitor as another reviewer suggested. In any case, the image is good and bright, and I can set focus fairly easily. I'm happy with the product and would buy again.

The monitor works great. Got this for an HV30 that is connected to a "Shigg Rigg"/ I had a tough time finding a cable for the monitor. Later saw that you can use a regular 1/8" audio cable. Yes I said that right, you can use an audio cable from the monitor to the HV30. You have to change a setting on the camera itself, but once it's up and going it works great. Widescreen, but it's not HD.

Good Buy, and works great.

Buy ProAm 7" On-Camera LCD Video Monitor Kit with RCA AV Inputs Now

If your looking for an external LCD this is it! The screen was bright and clearer than I anticipated. The resolution was good enough that I don't see the need for spending extra for an HD LCD. Overall, I am very pleased and could easily recommend this product.

Read Best Reviews of ProAm 7" On-Camera LCD Video Monitor Kit with RCA AV Inputs Here

Initially purchased for my T2i but I use more with my Canon GL2 for superb monitoring. Work perfect with standard 3ccd camera. A little fuzzy with HD cams such as T2i/ 60D etc. But great because u can see all the menu functions. I will be purchasing the hd version in the near future. But the ProAm7 will get a lot of use on & off camera for music videos & even event videos such as weddings.

Want ProAm 7" On-Camera LCD Video Monitor Kit with RCA AV Inputs Discount?

It's sad when others in media rate this product highly, this is simply a horrible excuse for a monitor. Not mad at the manufacturers, you get waht you pay for. But some of the reviews are highly misleading. Great toy for kids not for work or even prosumer use.

Save 46% Off

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Sony Open Box HXR-NX30U NXCAM Palm Size Full HD Professional Camcorder

Sony Open Box HXR-NX30U NXCAM Palm Size Full HD Professional CamcorderThis camera is perfect for the half a step below professional but more than a novice and priced right, too! The HD video it records is sharp and clear and it easy to switch between recording to the internal harddrive or to an SD card. The included microphone kit works like a charm and sounds good with great control options. The fluid lens works great keeping the picture stable and smooth as you move around. The projector, while an odd add-on, is actually pretty cool to be able to show people what you recorded without having everyone crowd around.

Overall, I'm very pleased with this purchase and recommend it to others looking to have a high-end camera but not have the high-priced broadcast level cams.

I pick this up for mostly use around the family. This camcorder almost have the same look and fell as the Sony PJ760 minus the XLR microphone. The unit come with one microphone, but there is room to plug in the second one.

There are many setting and features that almost fell like a pro camcorder.

Pro: Resolution, XLR microphone, camera stabilizer, built in projector, led light, and more

Cons: The handle could be alittle longer, lens hood fall off to easy, microphone cable clip break off very easy. dedicated manual button or control.

Over all, im pretty happy with my purchase. If you have any question, feel free to ask.

Buy Sony Open Box HXR-NX30U NXCAM Palm Size Full HD Professional Camcorder Now

I have been looking for pro quality HD video recorder for a number of years. As my kids get bigger, video becomes better at capturing those memories. I had a canon tape camcorder which was great. Unfortunately, the first moments of my youngest was overwritten after someone in the family viewed the video. One of the downsides of tape is that you need to forward back to the end of the recordings or else your prior recordings will be written over. With flash memory recordings, these problems are no longer an issue.

I've looked at SLR video and camcorders, and feel that focusing and white balance is superior (for now) on the camcorders. SLR video is a great tool, but for me, it requires too many accessories and attachments. What appealed to me the most is the size of the NX30U. It's small and discrete without the lens hood and XLR adapter and inputs. Similar quality recorders are larger and attract a lot of attention.

96GB of internal memory is great! You also have an extra SD slot. Still trying to figure out the maximum size card that can be used.

The image stabilization is fantastic! I was able to video a roller coaster ride at California Adventure and the balanced optical stabilization did a great job! I think this feature makes the NX superior to Canon and Panasonic. I was able to hand hold and video the World of Color and the video looks like it's on a tripod. The wide angle of the NX30 is 28mm and is best in class. Telephoto is ~260mm which is beat by Panasonic.

The AVCHD recording format will not import into iMovie, so you'll need to use Adobe's Pemiere or Apple's Final Cut X. Pro gear needs Pro software and a good storage solution. I feel that this is the biggest problem with HD video for most people. AVCHD is good for compression, but problematic for editing. Premiere and Final Cut has a steep initial learning curve.

I'm very happy with my purchase as it has great image quality with superior image stabilization in a small discrete package, but has the ability to flex up to pro audio if I need it.

Update: Got word from Sony USA and the largest SD card that can be used to supplement the 96GB internal flash memory is 64GB. Don't bother getting the 128 or 256GB SDXC cards! An added plus is that in OSX Mountain Lion, the AVCHD files are read by Quicktime natively. One needs to connect the NX30U via the USB port and the flash drive will mount. Clicking on the AVCHD icon, OSX will show previews of all the clips. They can then be opened and played in quicktime and exported to .mov files to where you want. Of course editing and making movies will need Premiere or Final Cut.

Read Best Reviews of Sony Open Box HXR-NX30U NXCAM Palm Size Full HD Professional Camcorder Here

Monday, November 11, 2013

Sony DCR-TRV11 MiniDV Camcorder with Built-in Digital Still Mode

Sony DCR-TRV11 MiniDV Camcorder with Built-in Digital Still ModeI have never had my own camcorder before, so I spent days looking at all makes and models trying to learn as much as I could. I even read several reviews here and after having held each one, trying out the features and driving salesmen crazy I finally got the Sony DCR-TRV11.

First, the display screen seems better. I looked at JVC and Panasonic and the Sony screen just looked better defined. Also, when panning, the autofocus reacted faster to my movements. My wife has small hands and this was one of the smallest ones out there so remember to consider size and weight. The resolution is very clean and the controls are all well placed. I didn't use the software that came with it, opting for Pinnacle's StudioDV. It comes with the Firewire card, software and cables. It's works great and is easy.

The Sony has a few key features like a mic input, which is important. If you are getting better picture your going to want better sound. The built in mic works good, but if you zoom on something distant, you're going to want an external mic. The hotshoe takes intelligent accesories, like a zoom mic or a flash that syncs with the still pics. It takes both DV tapes with and without chips in them. Be sure to get the tapes with the chip in them. You need the chip to index your pictures. This is important when connecting to your PC. The included 4MB memory stick holds about 30 pics at 640x480 (60 at lower resolution) and allows you to mix stills with your video for some nice effects. In addition to the night shot feature, the stabilization is far superior than any others I tried. Some only worked until you zoomed, others said they had it, but I couldn't tell. All the Sony's seemed best here. The battery life was about 50 min using zoom and the flip out display. The display tells you how much time in minutes you have left to record. Much longer lasting batteries are available, but there is no memory effect so you can charge at any time.

The camera is great for quality, feel and ease of use. I did have to download a driver to use the camera as a netcam and it would have been nice if it came with the Firewire cable in addition to the serial cable. We restled over the price and, while you can get a very good camcorder for less, we just couldn't pass up the Sony after holding it and comparing the features and quality. My wife and I are very happy with it and, if you can afford it, this ones the one to get.

This is a very good mid-entry Camcorder with the more than the standard features. This extremely compact unit nails the basic necessities (LCD screen, LCD swivel, steady-shot, 2-nightshots, and excellent output options IEEE, S-video, RCA). You get all the Sony amenities of scroll-select dial and a slew of A/V rec/playback options. Sony pushes the value-added package with the tight Carl Zeiss lens; the true optical zoom capabilities has something to be desired with the 1.7-3.3-33 ratio. However, you can't complain too much with the 20x and 120x digital option that performs quite decently. The color view finder can extend and pivot quite a nice mechanical option while having the ability to save battery life or if you're doing fixed-position video taping.

The digital photo on Memory Stick is a thing of beauty (transfer to tape and vice versa also an option). The TRV11's size is comparable to a digital camera. This allows me to just carry the TRV11 around having the option of motion or still capture forget the digital camera (as long as you've got good lighting).

My only complaint is a Catch22 the MV tapes can only be inserted from the bottom of the unit. This creates a problem for tripod mounted shooting. Sony organizes all this technology into such a small package it's hard to complain. 4 stars for the standard Sony-pricing premium though.

Buy Sony DCR-TRV11 MiniDV Camcorder with Built-in Digital Still Mode Now

I was looking for a camcorder that would provide me with excellent video recordings and the ability to transfer the recordings to the PC for editing and then sharing them with my friends and relatives.

The Sony TRV11 has an excellent imager and the Carl Zeiss Lens is the best available. I am completely satisfied with video recordings. The color viewfinder and a 3.5" display that can be rotated to face the subject are really worthwhile. I have found that kids are better on camera when they can see themselves. The instant replay on the LCD is also a very good feature. As a novice getting used to STBY and REC, I have used this feature a lot to record over bad shoots. Also, if you plan on shooting still images on tape or memory stick, this feature allows you to instantly determine whether you need more shoots to get the best pose. I strongly recommend a color enhancement light if you are doing indoor recordings, which is available as an accessory. I didn't want to spend on that right now so I move my halogen torch lights into the rooms that I wish to record. It is inconvenient but works great. TRV11 offers a 3 way PC link by means of an adapter for the memory stick, a serial port or a firewire port. If you have an ancient computer like I do and do not want to spend on a new computer, you will appreciate this.

Read Best Reviews of Sony DCR-TRV11 MiniDV Camcorder with Built-in Digital Still Mode Here

This is a great camera and they've packed a lot into this tiny unit, but for Mac users, beware: the PictureLite software that comes with the camera is for Windows users only. Be prepared to plunk down another $60+ for an adaptor in order to access jpgs on the Sony memory stick in the camera. Don't bother looking on Sony's website for answers to why there is no Mac version existing or coming...the issue simply isn't addressed anywhere and related Belkin products that promise to transfer still images do not transfer jpgs; only still video frames.

Want Sony DCR-TRV11 MiniDV Camcorder with Built-in Digital Still Mode Discount?

I bought the Sony DCR-TRV11 specifically for an African Safari, and am extremely pleased with the performance. I filmed through drenching rain, low-light conditions, over horribly bouncy roads, and the results are amazing. It is easy to learn to use the basic functions (I only had it for a week before departure, and didn't have much time to practice filming), and the quality makes even the most novice film-maker look good. Battery life is great (I took two with me and never ran out of power--even on days when the Safari Lodge generator failed and I couldn't recharge), and while the outside casing is a little worse for the wear, the camcorder performance is undiminished.

Sunday, October 6, 2013

HDMI Cable M-F Extension Gold Plated Connectors 3ft

HDMI Cable M-F Extension Gold Plated Connectors 3ftI ordered this product to fill a gap between my tv and cable box, and after nearly a year the extension is still working. Good product if you need those extra few inches.

works well great price. Had need for it to hide in a wall from DVD to a TV. Worked well.

Buy HDMI Cable M-F Extension Gold Plated Connectors 3ft Now

This extension was GREAT! And price very well! I needed about a 6 inch extension to properly center out television. I not only couldn't find one at these specialty stores, but if I were to order one, it was be over $50! Went on Amazon and got one for less then $10, S&H included.

Great buy (and sorry for the late review).

Read Best Reviews of HDMI Cable M-F Extension Gold Plated Connectors 3ft Here

I bought a bigger TV and the HDMI cord was a bit short. Extension is just the right length so I didn't have to run a longer HDMI cord through the wall. Works great.

Want HDMI Cable M-F Extension Gold Plated Connectors 3ft Discount?

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS 12.1 MP Wi-Fi Enabled CMOS Digital Camera with 10x Optical Zoom 24mm Wi

Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS 12.1 MP Wi-Fi Enabled CMOS Digital Camera with 10x Optical Zoom 24mm Wide-Angle Lens and 1080p Full HD VideoI have just finished taking my new Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS camera through a lengthy shakedown cruise. I have learned a number of things about it and will share my findings as clearly as I can.

You should know that I have far more digital cameras than one person should own. My experience with them over the years has given me some degree of confidence in what I say about the Canon ELPH 330HS. This is my second Canon camera. I also own a Canon PowerShot SX230 HS which is similar in several ways.

I am an avid amateur travel photographer and my remarks are influenced by using my cameras extensively for that purpose.

I hope the following observations will help you make a decision about the Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS.

Pros:

* The camera is quite small and a true pocket dweller.

* Mine is silver in color and it looks great.

* It takes excellent pictures with the AUTO setting, but there are many options for those who think they can do better manually.

* It has an extensive of list of shooting modes for every situation.

* It has face recognition along with blink and smile shooting features.

* The low light capacity of the camera is outstanding.

* 12.1 megapixels put a lot of detail in the pictures.

* The 10x optical zoom is plenty and the anti-shake feature keeps them crisp.

* The image stabilization feature works very well and it is automatic.

* Close-up shots are beautiful.

* The WiFi feature is outstanding technology and that makes this camera special.

* I use the WiFi in my ELPH 330 HS for wirelessly transferring photos to both iOS devices and PC computers. That is amazing.

* The camera stores images on SD memory cards so pictures can be shared with a computer that way too.

* Using the WiFi one can also upload photos directly to social networks or email.

* I used the free Apple app Camera Window to connect with my iPod 5g and it worked better than the Canon suggestions found in the DVD instruction manual.

* Paring with a PC computer is a bit tricky, but it can be done by ordinary mortals.

* The display window on the camera is large and bright.

* The 330HS movies are excellent and there are a number of shooting options available.

* There is even full HD video in stereo sound available.

* The fit and finish are very good and that means this is a solid high quality camera.

Cons:

* Setting up the WiFi feature is not all that easy even though some of it is automatic.

* WiFi photo transfer is somewhat slow, but no problem.

* The camera controls are not made for large fingers.

* I miss the manual shooting mode wheel--poking around on screen based options is too slow to be useful if scenes, locations and objects change rapidly.

* The instruction manual on the provided DVD is confusing for setting up WiFi.

* The Hybrid movie feature is strange and seems to have limited purpose.

* I have yet to determine what the body of this camera is made of. It seems very light in weight which suggests plastic, but maybe aluminum.

* One can get bogged down and confused by the myriad of options available and it is difficult to find the way back out of unwanted settings. There is a way to re-set everything just in case.

That is about all of the first impression information I can offer. I plan to carry my new ELPH 330 HS to Europe later in the spring and hope to take advantage of the WiFi features for sending photos back home to friends and relatives while I am traveling abroad.

UPDATE:

I have just returned from two weeks in Great Britain and almost 700 photos taken with my Canon ELPH 330 HS and I was very satisfied with the how it performed. This little camera did everything I asked of it. Transferring all of those pictures to my iPad and to my Windows 7 laptop via WiFi was a perfect addition to the many other features. I am even more impressed with this camera after putting it to a very rigorous test. I bumped the camera around a lot on our trip and without a case on it. I even dropped it once and it kept on ticking. As a travel camera it is the best of the bunch as far as I am concerned.

UPDATED MAY 7, 2013:

I just have to chime in again on this post after almost 2 months of usage. I have bumped this camera rating to 4 of 5 stars (from 3/5). The more and more we use this camera, the more we are impressed with the pictures that it takes. We've really been pushing the camera in its macro shots, different focus points, etc. and we have been increasingly more impressed. One thing you can't get hung up on is looking at the photos on the back of the camera. They always look really dark and under exposed, but by the time you get them on a computer or go to do any processing, it really has produced a great looking picture. The 10x zoom has been very handy for us as well.

I still think my below gripes are valid (and I've left them unchanged) and the low light action isn't as good as I'd hoped, but still works just as good as our phones if not better in low light.

Do I think that a very good camera phone like the S4 or iphone 5 would match this still "all around" (indoors and outdoors)??? Perhaps the S4 given the pixel density, but I think that the color reproduction on this camera would still be better than the phones. We've taken thousands of pictures with it by now and most of them come out pretty spectacular. That said, the S4 does have some unique camera modes that this camera just can't handle.

Overall, we like this camera and use it frequently.

______________________________

We just received this camera last night and we took about 200 photos in varying light conditions as well as a few videos. Our hope was to get a camera that would be better in low light than our Samsung GS3 and GS2 phones. We were also looking for something to be able to hand to someone to take a picture of us, as handing someone your phone usually ends up with blurry pictures and/or potential for a dropped phone! (or if they run off with your life!) Our phones take pictures indoors that usually result in blurry pictures of our daughter and dog, we hoped that a dedicated point and shoot would remedy this issues for us. The last P/S we owned was purchased 5+ years ago and its just too slow to take any quality pictures anymore....so we finally wanted to upgrade. Finally, we HAVE to have a good WiFi connection and features with this camera so we can easily move and share photos. That's the biggest reason why we don't whip out our DSLR very often because of the hassle of transferring cards and photos manually....its a hassle.

So, let's get started. There definitely are goods and "mehs" with this camera, hence the "it's okay" rating of 3 stars.

#1. Low Light photography ---> This was one of our biggest concerns in a new camera. I would say that this camera is barely above the quality of our cell phones. The megapixel count is higher, but the overall noise in the photos are about equivalent. We tried the auto modes as well as manually adjusting the ISO and metering. Nothing seemed to improve the situation over the "auto" mode. There was less blurring with the 330HS over our phones in similar photos, but overall this problem was not fixed by purchasing this camera. Disappointing to say the least. However, the shutter speed and timing is quite fast for a point and shoot. It is on par with our phones for speed of taking photos. I would say though that the burst modes on our phones are superior to this camera.

#2. Normal light photography (indoors and outdoors) ---> I found that this camera did a very good job with color reproduction in normal light conditions or outdoor photography. The colors were less blued and yellowed than from our phones. Like most cameras, if it can't perform here, it might as well not be sold. So I wasn't "impressed" by this to say the least.

#3. Video capture at 1080 -----> I thought this too was adequate. I could not tell a difference between our phones (which do a really good job with video) and the 330HS. The 330HS does have better video stabilization and obviously a zoom, which are nice touches that will keep us using this camera for videos for sure. We also have a Canon video camcorder HD and the quality exceeds that camcorder in my opinion with handling less favorable light conditions. The stereo sound is also good from the 330HS on video recording.

#4. Flash -----> It appears to us that the flash is not "even". The bottom of our photos appear brighter than the tops. We will see if this is just the LED bulb reaching some sort of usable state and I'll report back.

#5. Menu system ----> Its nice there are physical buttons on this camera and the menus seem fairly intuitive once you figure out the modes. The manual really has nothing in there about the menus and structures. The manual is pretty much completely written for WiFi connections.....speaking of which....

#6. WiFi connectivity (part 1 connect to phone) ----> This was, as mentioned above a big reason why we got this camera. The Canon Camera Window app is supposed to connect easily to the camera as long as they are both on the same WiFi network. The advantage of the 330HS over the 320HS is that the 330HS is able to create its own "Access Point" so you can connect the phone directly to the camera when there is no WiFi network to share. So...connecting the Android GS3 phone through the same WiFi network does not ever connect. ###EDIT: MAKE SURE THAT YOUR WIFI NETWORK SSID IS BROADCASTING! AFTER I DID THIS, IT CONNECTED INSTANTLY VIA THE ANDROID CANON CAMERA WINDOW APP.#### Creating an access point with the camera itself and connecting the phone to it does work and works pretty well. Photo transfer is surprisingly quick when this mode connects successfully.

#7 WiFi connectivity (part 2 connect to web services like Facebook and Twitterz) ----> Once you get the camera, connect it to a computer and install the CD that comes with it. You can't seem to download this software anywhere, so it'll be interesting to see what those with ultrabooks and computers without disc drives will do for this.....I imagine they will get the link up soon. After you connect the system and make a Canon iMAGE Gateway account (free), then you can use the utility to add webservices to your camera. The application you want to use is IMAGE TRANSFER UTILITY to set these things up. It'll connect to your camera and it will allow you to add the webservices. This process is entirely NOT INTUITIVE. I doubt that less savvy folks would be able to get through this....then again, less savvy folks probably don't use all the online sharing services. Once you get this all completed though, the image sharing to Facebook works quickly and the pictures show up in your timeline or whereever you appoint them to go. The Twitter posting just posts a link to your image on Canon iMAGE Gateway, does not put it in your feed. There is no access to Google+, which I think is a really big omission as that network is the one I like best and hopefully they will add this feature in the future.

#8 WiFi connectivity (part 3 stability of connection) ---> I thought I'd put this in a separate category. There doesn't seem to be a way to keep the camera connected to the internet if you wanted to move a few pictures in a short amount of time. Every single time the camera has to go through the SSID and password to connect back to the network. This takes probably about 30-60 seconds to complete. Sure that doesn't sound that slow, but when you are trying to share something and are used to an instant 2 taps to make it happen. This can feel like an eternity.

Wrap-up (and I will update this if we keep the camera longer than a week):

I was hoping that this camera would have wowed me considering that its 2013 and the camera tech is now pretty amazing, but instead its just "meh". I think that this camera is adequate for someone looking for a basic point and shoot that doesn't have a high end phone like the GS3, iphone5, LG Optimus Pro, HTC One, etc. If you have one of those phones, you will probably be a little frustrated with this device. We most likely will keep this camera just to have something to hand to someone to take a photo of us, since we rarely do that with our phones. Unfortunately though, I think that the touted features of this device like the WiFi connections (90% of the manual is dedicated to this) need some work. It seems frustrating that Canon would not learn more from the current phones on the market and emulate those same features and ease of use. So I will continue to use my phone and other devices for instant connections and use this for handing to people to take photos of us, I guess. Time will tell, I will update this post the more we use it. The good news is that some of these gripes can be fixed by software updates and app updates, but will Canon care to fix them???? They better if they want to stay relevant.

Buy Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS 12.1 MP Wi-Fi Enabled CMOS Digital Camera with 10x Optical Zoom 24mm Wi Now

I want to use my DSLR whenever possible, but it is often not practical to take with me as a "walkabout" camera due to its size and the need to carry additional often bulky equipment. A point-and-click camera is something I still use often and can carry with me at any time with barely a second thought.

I'd previously owned several Canon point-and-click models most recently a Powershot A2000 that I've taken almost 10,000 photos with so far and is still going strong. It is getting a little long in the tooth now though, with just a CCD sensor rather than a CMOS, and fairly limited operation and speed due to the old Digic 3 processor, (rather than the Digic 5 in this ELPH 330 model.) The Digic 5 processor is noticeably quicker than my old Digic 3 based camera and of course it has to do a lot more as well both due to shooting in much higher resolutions, but also because the camera has a lot more automated features. The fact that this camera had the Digic 5 processor was a big selling point to me. It offers a huge improvement over previous iterations of the chip, (I won't detail them here but Canon's website provides this information if anyone is interested.)

When I received this camera, the first thing that struck me was how tiny it is especially bearing in mind the fact it has a 10x optical zoom that is required to extend out so significantly and retract back into the main body. How Canon has achieved this is beyond me, but I'm glad they did.

Anyone who has ever used a previous Canon digital camera will be right at home using this new model. The auto mode is fantastic I never thought I'd say that about a compact camera and it takes great photos in a variety of environments I've tested it in, (at night under artificial light with and without the flash; outside on a sunny day and outside after snowfall; indoors during the day, outside in close to darkness, etc.) To be honest, I'm fairly experienced when it comes to photography I know my way around f-stops, shutter speed, ISO, exposure, etc. as I own a DSLR, but for use as a "walkabout" camera, I'll probably only somewhat rarely take this camera out of "Auto" mode. The pictures are so wonderfully focused, clear and full of color. The semi-auto and manual modes are still there, (with the omission of the old "landscape" mode although there is an "infinity" mode now that appears to be a similar thing.) There is a Program (P) mode too which I've always found incredibly useful and my default mode to use with other Canon point-and-shoot models that mode allows the camera to handle the aperture and shutter and gives control to the user to set other factors of the photo namely the ISO, flash mode, exposure compensation and white-balance. The camera does still retain a "Portrait" mode too, which is useful for taking photos of people up close and allows the camera to blur the background a little using a large aperture (i.e. small f-stop) automatically.

This camera has built in wireless connectivity, but, to be honest I probably will never use this capability. I prefer to copy my images to my computer and edit/crop them in Paintshop Pro prior to uploading them anywhere.

Insofar as video recording goes, I was very impressed by the quality both of the picture and the sound. I briefly tried full 1080p recording, and was quite astounded by the quality once I downloaded the video to my computer. However, for my purposes the 720p resolution is good enough, (and a much smaller file size to work with and edit.) As with all point-and-click cameras you can audibly hear the camera zooming in and out on the recording if you decide to do so. It's not too imposing though so it's no big deal. Most of the video I'll ever take with this camera will be wide-angle anyway, so I'll probably never touch the zoom lever while recording anyway.

The 12.1mp CMOS blows away all the 16mp CCD cameras I've seen and used. I know a lot of people believe that a digital camera's specification all but ends at the megapixel level, with the more the better, but this is a false belief. A camera with a good CMOS sensor is FAR better than a cheaper (but perhaps more megapixel) CCD based camera.

I'm trying to think of negatives to balance my review, but am struggling. I'd like Canon to stop ripping off their customers with the price of additional "official" batteries. True, there are cheap clones at less than 20% of the price of a Canon brand, but if the reviews on them are anything to go by, they should be used with caution and may invalidate you camera warranty if they cause damage. Ah... I just thought of a negative thing about the camera itself -the buttons on the back are flat and almost flush with camera body. This can make them a little harder to press than with previous camera models which had raised or rounded buttons. Sorry, that's the biggest negative I can think of. This is a terrific camera.

P.S. The camera comes with a decent little "Getting Started" manual. However, there is a much more comprehensive and detailed manual available (for free) from the Canon USA website, and also on the disc supplied with the camera. Amazon doesn't allow web-links in their reviews, so I'll post the link to download the full manual as a comment on this review instead, (which does seem to be allowed by Amazon.) Anyone considering buying this camera also may wish to download the manual to ensure the ELPH 330 is the model for you, or to familiarize themselves with operating it while you wait for Amazon to deliver it.

Read Best Reviews of Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS 12.1 MP Wi-Fi Enabled CMOS Digital Camera with 10x Optical Zoom 24mm Wi Here

I bought the ELPH 330 to replace a Canon PowerShot ELPH 310 that was 'appropriated' by a family member. I quite liked the 310, and the other ELPH models that we've owned previously (SD100, SD200, SD400). To give this review some context, I also have a Canon PowerShot S5, a GoPro Hero, and various film cameras dating back to an Olympus OM-1 and a Rollei 35. While Canons may not always be the 'best' cameras on the market, I've become used to the Canon menu system, and my collection of accessories are compatible with my previous ELPHs. So I assumed the ELPH 330 would be a satisfying addition to my photographic arsenal.

Alas, I was sadly disappointed. What's wrong with it? In a word, the user interface. It has regressed significantly compared to the 310. The biggest shortcoming is the all-important '5-way' controller (the up, down, left, right, and the central FUNC/SET buttons). On the 310, the 5-way was slightly raised above the body of the camera, making it possible to position one's thumb on the desired portion of the controller by touch alone. On the 330, the buttons are completely flush with the body. This may sound like a small detail, but I've found this design change makes it much harder to operate the 330. I've found it tricky to register my thumb over the 5-way without looking, and I don't have terribly big hands. The tiny FUNC/SET button in the center of the cluster is actually recessed just a bit, which is terrible from an ergonomic perspective. One needs a tiny thumb to reliably click on the FUNC/SET button. In the short time I've had the 330, I've accidentally activated the wrong button numerous times.

The second failing of the 330's UI is the bizarre slide switch. Canon has taken what was a great step forward on the 310 UI and totally trashed it on the 330. On the 310, the slide switch selected between AUTO or MANUAL modes of operation. The former was great for taking quick'n easy point-and-shoot tourist snapshots. When the photographer wanted more 'creative control', a simple flip of the switch put the camera into manual mode. User could then choose from a large variety (too many) of special shooting modes (portrait, nighttime, backlit, sports...), adjust ISO, override shutter speed, etc. This arrangement was extremely versatile and I've come to love it.

On the ELPH 330, the slide switch now activates a glitzy new Canon feature: photos plus a Movie Digest. When you slide the switch to the 'up' position, the camera takes a still photo in Auto mode AND a 3-second movie clip captured immediately before every still photo is taken. It then composes a daily sequence of these clips, all concatenated together. So if you were to shoot 60 pictures on a given day, you'll end up with 60 still photos, plus a 3-minute long movie containing the 'live action' as you composed each shot. With the switch 'down', the Movie Digest feature is turned off and the camera operates in whatever mode is chosen from the Record Mode menu (not necessarily Auto mode).

The side effects of this fancy Digest feature are non-trivial. First, the camera goes dormant for a few seconds after the shutter is pushed, while the captured movie clip is compressed and concatenated onto the daily movie file. During this interval, the green 'camera busy' light is flashing. This means you can't take another photo until the movie processing is completed. No rapid-fire picture taking when in Digest mode. Perhaps more important is the potential impact on battery life. When the 330 is in this mode, it's capturing video continuously. It doesn't know when you're going to trip the shutter, so it constantly records video into an internal 3-second buffer memory, which is then saved to the SD card after each click of the shutter. I haven't yet measured the impact on battery life but continuous video capture and storage will surely shorten run time.

Fortunately, the ELPH 330 still has both Automatic and Manual picture modes, but you now have to make a trip down into the menu system to select one or the other. The slide switch, which occupies a fair bit of the limited real estate on the back of the camera, is totally wasted (unless one becomes enamoured with the Movie Digest mode). I'm astounded that Canon would deem this feature so important that it qualified for 'top billing' with a dedicated mode switch. Perhaps there is a big demand for this feature in Japan, but I can do without it.

I'd be remiss if I didn't mention the improvements in the 330. The longer telephoto (10x, vs 8x in the 310) is a small but welcome enhancement. Likewise, the wide angle is a little wider (24 vs 28mm). I haven't yet mastered the WiFi features. Canon's user manual describing them meets their usual standard for convoluted & confusing documentation.

Occasionally, the orientation sensor (sensing landscape vs portrait) messes up and misclassifies the orientation of a picture. This may be a defect with the sensor in my unit, or could be a design issue that affects all ELPH 330 units.

Frankly, I'm undecided whether to keep the ELPH 330 or not. I'm tempted to carefully place a tiny dollop of hot-melt glue on the FUNC/SET button. That might partly alleviate the ergonomic shortcomings of the 5-way controller. But there's no way to make the stupid Movie Digest slide switch useful and achieve the versatile functionality found in the ELPH 310.

Want Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS 12.1 MP Wi-Fi Enabled CMOS Digital Camera with 10x Optical Zoom 24mm Wi Discount?

I used a Canon Power Shot A1000 IS for almost five years and love Canon quality. What I love about this new Canon is how user friendly it is. So simple, and I very quickly was able to load the software, register on line and send pictures to my computer, on line social media and iPhone with the Wi-Fi ability. Going from picture to movie mode is the push of a button. Has great options for an amateur photographer like me. You can also purchase a tripod separately. Can't wait for our next vacation or holiday event to really have fun with it. Want to get a compatible printer to use it to the fullest!! Still picture and movie quality is really good. If you are looking for an easy to use, technology minded camera, I recommend this one without hesitation.

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Panasonic Pro AG-DVC30 3-CCD MiniDV Camcorder w/16x Optical Zoom

Panasonic Pro AG-DVC30 3-CCD MiniDV Camcorder w/16x Optical ZoomThis is a great camera for the wedding videographer or other serious amateur or semi-professional. It's well built, has great manual control, and takes super video including good low-light performance. You will probably want the external mic attachment, which lets you use professional microphones without additional adapters and signal processors. Now that the price is well below $2000, it's a great deal. One caveat: If you plan to shoot 16:9 format, this is not the best choice. The Panasonic GS400 handles that much better, and at a lower price. (But the GS400 doesn't have the low-light chops that the DVC-30 has so you have to set your priorities.)

Plusses:

* Very good low light capability

* Sturdy, metal body construction

* Will take professional external microphones (with optional attachment)

* Unbelievable B&W no-light capability with infrared (short range built into camera; medium range add-on IR light increases range to hundreds of feet.)

* Excellent manual control available via menu AND you can put your favorite four settings on programmable buttons on the camera body for extra convenience.

* Without attachments, the body with built-in mic is small and consumer-like (won't draw attention to itself), not to mention light-weight.

* Lovely video with three 1/4-inch CCD's.

Minuses:

* The Sony 2100 has even better low-light ability

* The 16:9 mode isn't as good as the PDX10 or GS400.

* The still picture capability is only adequate.

* The built-in mic is only average.

This is a superior camera for the money. Simple operation and well constructed. It has a "well built feel" to it and fits well in your hand. The detail of the image is awesome, better than I hoped for. I'm very impressed with the 16x zoom, very nice and clean image.

Don't be fooled by the size of this camera, the quality of the image is beautiful. A lot of camera in a little package. It has 4 built in shooting settings for different situations. It has a low level light option that does a decent job of capturing the scene after dark.

I gave it 4 stars because I didn't like the manual that it came with and the manual controlling for the iris and focus could have been made easier to access and use. The built in microphone does not really pick up the desired audio that well. I recommend picking up an external boom microphone or lapel mic system to supercede the built in mic depending on your application.

If you are in need of a firewire cable to download the video to your computer make sure you pick one of those up as well. The camera firewire port is a 4pin firewire connector.

Buy Panasonic Pro AG-DVC30 3-CCD MiniDV Camcorder w/16x Optical Zoom Now

While the Sony vx2100 does better in low light, this camera holds it's own very well. For the price, it's impossible to beat. Great picture quality, 3.5 inch LCD and solid build quality. Most cameras in this range still have the plastic body, but the magnesium alloy body on the AG-DVC30 is rugged and feels great. I've used it for regular family shooting and filming plays. So many choices on the manual settings. Can't say enough. Here's a great forum for it.

Read Best Reviews of Panasonic Pro AG-DVC30 3-CCD MiniDV Camcorder w/16x Optical Zoom Here

Strengths: 1. Great price. 2. Very good picture quality. 3. Excellent low light capabilities. 4. Excellent auto-focus. 5. Excellent zoom range and control. 6. Small and light. 7. Small and compact.

Weaknesses: 1. Ok, internal mic. Low audio output. 2. No true 16x9 mode. 16x9 squeeze mode reduces quality.

Summary: I have used this camera on three shoots so far and it continues to surprise and impress me. For the money its an excellent deal. The image quality is comparable to its big brother the AG-DVX100. Didn't think the night modes would be usefull but they can be and can produce some very artistic shots in B&W.

My only disappointment is no true 16x9 mode. The 16x9 modes they have reduces image quality noticably.

I would definitely recommend an external mic. I use the Rode video mic...very sensitive but comparable to the more expensive shotguns. Also, a wide angle lens is a must. The Raynox HD-6600 is an excellent lens for the price and it produces a great soft focus effect at the long end of the zoom range. Also the Libec zoom controller works great on the camera and for creative shots check out the new Manfrotto Fig Rig.

Want Panasonic Pro AG-DVC30 3-CCD MiniDV Camcorder w/16x Optical Zoom Discount?

Titles says it all. For the money, the best camcorder hands down. After 2 weeks of intense research and a month of using this camcorder, no regrets.