GTMax 6ft Micro HDMI to HDMI Male Cable

There is a huge difference between watching something on a phone or tablet and seeing it on a big screen TV. This cord allows me to see that difference and its great! Whether I'm watching a movie through Netflix or scrolling through pictures, I love being able to hook up to the TV for viewing

It worked. That was all I needed. It doesn't appear to be cheaply made. Thankful for that. But, it's just a cable.

Buy GTMax 6ft Micro HDMI to HDMI Male Cable Now

Works great with my ASUS Tablet. I use it in the Hotels when I travel are to conduct a briefing on a bigger screen.

Read Best Reviews of GTMax 6ft Micro HDMI to HDMI Male Cable Here

The cable was the right one and worked perfectly. I bought it for a vizio tablet and it fit.

I haven't got a app yet to make the picture fit the tv screen but I am sure there is one out there. The picture appears on the TV as expected.

Want GTMax 6ft Micro HDMI to HDMI Male Cable Discount?

Hello everyone! I was looking for decision how to enlarge picture during watching movies and playing games on my Transformer TF300 Tablet. With the help of Micro HDMI Cable I found the solution. Now I can play games and watch movies with HD quality! Recommended for buying!

Save 90% Off

Sony DPF-D810 8-Inch SVGA LCD (4:3) Digital Photo Frame -Black

The main reason I decided to buy a digital photo frame is because printing out photos from my Sony DSC-H5 on an Epson PictureMate to share with the family got pretty tiresome. Sure, the prints looked good, but printing them took a long time, they cost about 35 cents apiece and some of the older relatives couldn't see them very well. I figured a digital photo frame would improve the whole process. My requirements were simple: the frame must have very high resolution, be small and lightweight (for packing in a carry-on suitcase), and accept images via a Memory Stick and also via a standard USB interface (which many, I found, do not).

The Sony DPF-D810 meets all of my requirements with flying colors. The 800-by-600-pixel 8-inch-diagonal display is clear, crisp, bright and saturated. Photos display instantly, either singly, until you manually advance them, or in a slideshow with your choice of 10 time intervals from three seconds to 24 hours and with your choice of six transition effects. You can show the full image or crop it to fit the screen. If the aspect ratio of the picture is wider than 4:3, thin black bars appear at the top and bottom of the screen--the image itself is undistorted. You can display image information such as the time and date taken, camera type, shutter speed and aperture, EV compensation and more. The unit will show photos directly from an SD memory card, Memory Stick Duo or USB flash drive, or you can copy them to the internal memory, which holds about 150 high-resolution images. A mini-USB connector lets you transfer photos directly from your computer. You can choose from 14 different full-screen clock and calendar displays, or integrate a clock and/or calendar with six of the 10 different slideshow display options. Thus you can place this frame on a desk or mantel and run it all the time as a useful item of room decor. You can even choose whether or not to display the bright "Sony" logo on the lower part of the frame. All in all, this is a very impressive device that should satisfy the most demanding user. Plus, it is small (roughly 9 inches by 7 inches by 1 inch) and lightweight (less than 1-1/2 pounds, including the AC transformer and the remote control).

Speaking of which, the remote control is a great bonus. When I first set up the DPF-D810, I found it difficult to see the on-screen menus while manipulating tiny buttons with minuscule labels on the back of the unit. Then I used the remote. What a difference! You can access all of the frame's well-designed and logically arranged setup and functional menus with ease. Not all frames in this price category offer remotes. I didn't care about it when I selected this frame, but now I wouldn't be without it.

Even though I wanted a digital photo frame for just one simple purpose, I was pleased to find that this one far exceeded my expectations and offered much more than I needed for a reasonable price. If you're considering taking the next logical evolutionary step in digital photography by displaying your pictures on a photo frame rather than printing them, I highly recommend you consider the Sony DPF-D810.

I'm the one in the family...and extended family...that does the shopping for electronics/digital products. You know me, many of you have that guy in your own families or group of friends.

When I decided to buy digital frames for my parents and my wife for this Christmas, I did a lot of research and looked at a lot of digital frames. I read a lot of reviews as well and compared many of the features available. Here's what I liked about the Sony DPF-D810 8-inch SVGA Frame:

Simply to use, yet has advanced features that you don't get in this price range

Sturdy, well thought-out design (even the remote is sturdy...many have flimsy remotes that are useless)

4:3 format...standard photo size, so it doesn't undesirably crop your precious photos

Allows the use of all standard memory cards to include USB thumb drives -great for anyone that might be technically challenged

It's not a knock-off brand and was obviously well tested..I didn't have to wonder how long it would reliably work

It's not the biggest frame on the market...it's not the most expensive (by far)

It is a great buy for $79!

Buy Sony DPF-D810 8-Inch SVGA LCD (4:3) Digital Photo Frame -Black Now

I just loaded this frame up with pictures of the kids for grandma, and can say that this frame is a much better choice for the price than other brands.

I really wanted to offer a contrast to the only review (so far) for this product, since I had a far different experience.

There are many menu options to customize the viewing experience, including a setting to change the delay between pictures from 3 seconds to 24 hours. There are also nine different types of slideshows, plus a random mix of those types available.

Also in the menu options is a Shuffle option to randomize the order of your pictures.

I chose to resize the photos to match the display resolution of the frame (800X480). This dropped the size from 2+ mb per picture to around 50 kb per picture, and they are virtually indistinguishable from a regular viewing distance. At the moment, there are 500+ pictures in the internal memory, with more than half of the room left.

The picture quality is great especially compared to other brands in this price range.

Read Best Reviews of Sony DPF-D810 8-Inch SVGA LCD (4:3) Digital Photo Frame -Black Here

Bought this due to Sony's quality in imaging space and 10-in diagonal screen. After loading photos, am amazed at how great the pictures look and how nice the photo frame is. Had not bought a digital photo frame previously due to cost and small screen size, am glad I waited until now.

Anyway, great product with excellent viewing from all angles and lots of configurable options (interval settings, random, clock, etc.). Did not find any of the limitations or issues that earlier reviewer noted, thankfully went ahead and bought it.

Here is my summary:

high quality screen

good viewing angles

very nice frame for use in living room etc.

easy to configure

good price

One suggestion if you use Picasa or any other photo editing program. You can crop your photos using the "5:3 Widescreen Photo Frame" crop option and they will fit perfectly in the 800x480 frame when you do a File->Export (option Resize to 800). Or if you prefer, you can let the Sony resize/crop for you.

Anyway, great product and in my personal opinion, definitely worth recommending to others.

Want Sony DPF-D810 8-Inch SVGA LCD (4:3) Digital Photo Frame -Black Discount?

I bought a couple of digital frames from another company for my parents and in-laws a few years ago, but they just didn't use them much. There were two principal reasons why: no auto on-off mechanism and no shuffle function. This frame takes care of both issues nicely. The shuffle function is truly random, so you're constantly seeing new pictures. The auto on-off feature is quite sophisticated. It allows you to choose a different on and off schedule for each day of the week. Plus you can have it turn on and off multiple times in each day. So, I have my frame turning on at 6am everyday. On Monday through Friday it turns off at 9am when I leave for work and then back on at 3pm when my kids get home. On Saturdays and Sundays it stays on the whole day. Then every night it turns off at 10pm. It's great having it on the whole time we're home, but then not wasting electricity at night or when we're away from home.

I've been very impressed by the frame in addition to these features. It's very easy to set up and picture quality is great. The remote makes navigating the menus to adjust settings or skipping pictures easy and convenient.

I wanted to also mention a couple of limitations that I would have like to have known when I was buying my frame. They don't change my rating of the frame, but are just useful to know ahead of time.

A few reviewers mentioned that the screen was smaller than they would have liked, based on where they were going to use it. The same happened to me. My frame is in the living room in a place where you can see it from a pretty good distance. Although the picture quality is good enough to see from far away, the size of the screen means that your pictures just aren't that big. As a result, I find myself invariably walking up to the frame to get a better look at whatever picture's showing. So before you decide, it might be good for you to know the actual dimensions of the screen and frame, since the 8" diagonal measurement is hard to decipher and the frame measurement listed on Amazon is wrong. The screen is 4.75" x 6.5" and the frame is 9.2" x 7".

The one other caveat I discovered is that the frame can handle only 5000 pictures at a time. I bought a 8GB SD card and just filled it up with as many digital pictures I could fit. Well as it turned out, that came out to more than 5600 pictures. Now, every time I turn the frame on, it reminds me that the max is 4999 and that it won't be showing me some of my pictures. It's not a big deal since 4999 is plenty to see, but it's good to know. I had considered buying a larger SD card to have even more photos loaded on the frame, but now I realize that it wouldn't be able to show them, so why bother.

All in all, this is an excellent frame that I'm glad I bought. It has a couple of limitations based on the way I'm using it, but that doesn't detract from its quality and utility for others.

Flip Video Cables HDMI

Beware the new 3rd generation Flip Ultra HD requires a Micro not mini HDMI

cable and these do not fit!!

I got these cables for free as a Flip Ultra HD bundle. The Flip was a Christmas gift for my mother as it is very simple to operate. With the cable attached to my HD TV, she can instantly watch the video she just shot without waiting for me to download the files to my computer and on to the portable player/hard drive. Two cables are included in this package, one long and one short. The short cable is long enough for my needs. I have the long one in my camera bag for travel. To my surprise, these cables also work with my Canon 5D Mark II and are very good built/quality.

Buy Flip Video Cables HDMI Now

Works great! I can immediately watch my HD videos on my HD TV. They were very easy to connect. I leave one set connected to the TV all the time, so I can watch instant videos. The second set I keep in my bag, so if I'm at a friends house and shoot stuff, we can watch the videos right away. I highly recommend you purchase these cables for your Flip Video camera.

Read Best Reviews of Flip Video Cables HDMI Here

Excellent cables except that they do not fit my 3rd generation FLIP. IF I had read the reviews on this product, I would have known that.

Customer reviews are one of the the best reasons to buy from Amazon. Micro HDMI to HDMI cables are available from Amazon.

Want Flip Video Cables HDMI Discount?

Comes with two of them. The white one is long and the black one is short. Got this for free with the flip when I ordered so they are worth it. They do there job and with the Ultra HD and this on your HD tv it looks amazing!

Save 84% Off

Polaroid IP300W wireless IP Network Security Camera, Pan and Tilt, IR-cut Filter, White

Setup was a pretty big pain. Save yourself the headache and take my word for it, You MUST use IE in order to access "full features", which is most of the features. I assumed there would be an iPhone app to access the live feed, there is not. You are limited to typing in the IP address via Safari.

The video quality isn't fantastic, but it's not that bad IF they lighting is decent. Another annoyance is that there is no battery option, the only way to power the camera is via DC/power outlet and the cord is not very long.

The hardware feels cheap, hard plastic. The back of the unit has two slots, one labeled "SD" -DO NOT attempt to put an SD Card into either slot they do not go anywhere... I made this mistake and had to disassemble the unit in order to retrieve my memory card...

So far, I have not found a way to actually record video. I have configured it to send images via e-mail when motion is detected, which is nice but an actual video would be much better... (I'll update this if I figure out how to do it...)

Overall, for the price ($99 at the time of writing, prime eligible) it's not what I had in mind, but IF I can get it to record actual video I would probably buy another unit... For now, 3 stars because it is more peace of mind, but disappointing.

It worked for 3 days and then stopped working what a piece of work. I also bought 2 IP200's one of those work for a week and stopped working, so far I have 1 of the original 3 that is still working, but for how long is any bodies guess.

Buy Polaroid IP300W wireless IP Network Security Camera, Pan and Tilt, IR-cut Filter, White Now

Axis 0202024 Camera Station 1 Year Support Extension

This is an upgrade to the Axis Camera Station software. You are given the licence for the upgrade. The software itself can be downloaded atThe previous reviewer showed a bit of ignorance on how software upgrades are sold these days, which is to be given a licence key for use with your existing version for the upgrade and download the softer from the manufacturer. I am very happy for my Axis Camera Station and chose to upgrade to the latest. One Android App I am interested in for my smartphone requires the latest version. I recommend it highly. You can also test it for 30 days by going to the Axis.com site above before buying.

This is not the Axis Camera Station software that the description leads you to believe. This is simply a paper license, with no software included.

Buy Axis 0202024 Camera Station 1 Year Support Extension Now

Fuji FinePix JZ310 AV Cable - TV Video Cord for Fuji FinePix JZ310

Thanks so much! I bought this AV cable because it was a fraction of the cost compared to the ones in stores. It was exactly what I was looking for and fits nice and snug. I would recommend this cable to anyone wanting to save money and get a great cable!

Save 75% Off

Canon VIXIA HF200 HD Flash Memory Camcorder w/15x Optical Zoom

The video quality is superb, as is ease of use. Here are a few hints and things I noticed. The battery out of the box will not power-on the camera and needs some minutes of charge to even show 0%. You can operate the camera from the charger but the battery is not being charged, says the manual.

There are two 1920x1080 picture quality modes: MXP at 24 mbps and FXP at 17 mbps -and three at 1440x1080: XP+, SP and LP, at 12, 7 and 5 mbs, respectively. I believe it defaults to LP out of the box, which is 1440x1080 at 7 mbps. I suggest you select FXP to get true 1920x1080 resolution. Upping to 24 mbps might be a good idea only if you are going to do a lot of post editing -I can't see an improvement over FXP. Recording times with a 16GB card are 1:25, 2:05, 2:50, 4:45 and 6:05, respectively.

When the camera is OFF, pressing the DISP button (on the camera body) will show battery capacity in minutes and percent. Pressing DISP when ON turns the LCD to max brightness. IOW, you can set the LCD brightness for normal indoor use with the menu and instantly set it bright for outdoor use. Handy.

The CINE mode seems to digitally soften the image; there may some color change but I didn't notice it from the shots I took in a park. The PF30 and PF24 rates show a jerkiness when panning as you would expect from a lower frame rate. I think these rates are simulated because all recording is done at 60i. For example when I played back PF24 stepping one frame at a time I saw the same image for 3 steps, then the next. (The "3 steps" varies with both PF24 and PF30.) OTOH, PF24 is useful in low light situations as it permits the HF200 slow the shutter speed down to 1/6 sec.

Previous Canon users will find the menu system easy and familiar, similar even to their still cameras. The joystick is "big" and has a positive, definite feedback feel to it. Menu navigation seems easier and clearer than earlier Canons I've used. There is even a Large Font choice. Good!

The Power On button is deep in a groove that makes it unlikely to accidentally turn on. But with your right hand in the nice grip you have to use the left to press it On my fingers don't reach. No loss, you need the other hand to open the LCD panel anyway. The zoom lever on top is a middle finger control. The adjacent Photo button is for a trained index finger. Record, at the back, is thumb operated. You can also use an LCD panel button to Record.

The Quick Start feature means you can close the LCD to save power (runs at 1/3 normal) and be ready to shoot in about 1 sec after opening it. Note, if you close the LCD panel while recording it will continue to record -so slamming it shut does not stop the shot.

The still photo features are quite amazing. The resolution is 3 megapixels, but a very good 3mp! You can shoot continuously at 3 or 5 frames/sec. And you can shoot at the same fast frame rates with flash! The flash is actually a high-power white LED, not a xenon tube. There is a separate warm-white LED for video that works OK to 5-6 feet.

There are the usual auto white balance, auto exposure, instant focus features and so on that you can read about above. There's face detection for proper focus. They all work very well. I like the Vivid color setting for most all shooting video and photo. It is a slight pump in saturation that helps if you mainly view using your laptop LCD. Instant AutoFocus is aptly named. There is a fairly large IAF sensor next to the lens for this purpose. The 15x zoom, a first for me, is fully useful all the way out. Impressive.

Battery life (BP-809) takes a definite second place to 16GB storage. I just checked and it indicates 100%, 94 minutes. But you can of course buy larger batteries. (I use the smaller BP-808 battery from my FS100 SD video cam as a backup.) With the Quick Start feature (can be turned off) power is used between shots and this will generally use more juice that actual recording. Figure 3 to 5 times battery vs video: one hour of video needs 3+ hours of battery cap. Unless you buy a charger you must charge in the camera. Only one sample so far, but it seemed to take a little more than an hour to charge from 0%.

The supplied Pixela software is minimal. You can combine up to 99 shots into an M3TS file. It can be played on video players like Popcorn Hour and the WD HD TV player. (I have both and strongly recommend the $99 WD over the $230 PCH. The PCH can connect to Internet servers, its main claim to fame.) These players can also play the MTS format directly copied from the SD card but there is a 1-2 sec delay between each shot. Pixela lets you pick and chose shots, trim a given shot, and add titles and audio. I don't know how to get past the 99 shot limit with Pixela -I made about 170 shots in the park yesterday.

All in all, I luves it.

I need a HD camcorder for my new born baby, but with a limited budget. So I compared canon HF200, Sony CX100 and Panasonic TM20R since they are all in sub 600 range. I tried all of them in local stores and finally settled with canon HF200, although it's a little bit more expensive than cx100 and TM20R.

The sensor of HF200 is the biggest one among these three, 1 /4" (1/5" for CX100, 1/6" for TM20R). It guaranteed best resolution, 2.99 Megapixels ( 2.3 M for cx100, 1.14M for TM20R) and in my experience larger sensor also helps lower the noise in dark environment. Indeed, minimal illumination condition for HF200 is 0.4 lux, much better than thre other two. I took a couple of sample shots in local stores and the picture from HF200 for dark environment is acceptable. Sony cx100 is barely acceptable and Panasonic TM20R is total crap, not even as good as my webcam.

After I finally bought HF200, I never regretted! The video quality is just superb. For the 1920x1080 quality videos, it has two modes: MXP(24Mbps) and FXP(17Mbps). To be honest I can't tell the quality difference between these two. I guess unless you are gonna do massive editing, FXP is good enough for daily usage. So on a 16GB sd memory card, I can record 135 minutes 1080p HD video.

The still image shot quality is quite good too, and it's powered by the 15x optical lens(35mm equivalent: 39.5 592.5mm). It gives you a very handy telephoto camera and the image stabilization works very well on the long focus end too. Last weekend with this camera, I easily took some nice pictures of two bears far far away from me. Most of other HD camcorders only have 10x lens.

All the button and menu are well designed. It's very easy to use and I don't even need to read the manual. LCD panel is in good size too.

Canon Face Detection is also a very nice feature. The same high quality Face Detection technology used in Canon digital cameras is now available in Canon High Definition camcorders. Up to 35 faces can be detected automatically, and 9 detection frames can be displayed at one time. Face Detection ensures razor-sharp focus and natural, accurate exposure of the chosen subjects.

Okay, let me also mention some cons. First, like one of the other reviewer said, the software coming with it sucks! It can only edit the original format from the camcorder and output to same format instead of other more popular formats. Thanks god the newest windows media player support the video files directly from the camcorder. You can just use the usb cable or pop the sd memory card into a card reader and copy all the .mts file into your computer and rename them into .m2ts, then by double clicking it windows media player opens it right away. However, windows movie maker can't handle them, and you can upload .m2ts file to youtube.com but the sound of the video will be cut off after a couple of seconds. So if you want to edit your videos and share your videos, probably you need buy a converting software like total video converter

One thing I forgot to mention, Its twin brother canon HF20 has exactly all the same configuration as HF200 except with 32GB interal memory. However HF20 is almost 200 bucks more expensive than HF200. Now the SD memory card is so cheap. I suggest you to buy HF200 with a 16GB or 32GB SD card. Just don't forget to use class 4 or up SD card.

To summarize, overall it's the best entry level HD camcorder. With the price drop alert subscription from I got it from amazon.com for only $560.5. It is worth every penny.

Buy Canon VIXIA HF200 HD Flash Memory Camcorder w/15x Optical Zoom Now

Great camcorder, but get a bigger battery such as the BP-827, the default one makes a nice backup.

The software provided sucks, and you have to figure out by yourself which program does what: The main interface can upload videos, but not play or edit them, as it does for photos. It also creates a clutter of Start menu shortcuts in Windows that you don't need since these programs are called by the main program, ZoomBrowser. About the Pixela video editing software provided, well, let's just say that it's better forgotten...

Only 15 music tracks in wave format are provided to use as soundtrack.

There is also a Canon online photo storage offer that you probably don't need if you already have a blog or email provider.

The good thing is that the AVCHD format of this camcorder is supported by Windows Media Player 11 (at least on my Vista Ultimate machine). Not sure if it's native to Windows or if it came with other software I installed. The MTS file extension was not supported, though, you need to add it manually: Open a MTS file from Windows Explorer, choose "Select an installed program", select Windows Media Player and the checkbox to remember it.

Transferring the videos using the software provided is very cumbersome (cantbearsome really): You need both the USB and power cables, and clicking your way through a few screens on the camcorder before the transfer can start. I could start the photo transfer from either the camcorder or the computer, but only from the computer for videos.

My suggestion: Don't install any of the software, it's easier to just copy the files from a card reader to your hard disk using Windows Explorer. You can get a multi 23-in-1 card reader for about $20, finally get rid of this useless floppy drive, and add a front USB port to your PC!

The camcorder in this offer does not ship with any card, you need to buy one separately. 16GB is good enough for medium quality. If you need higher quality or continuous shooting, you should probably get two cards, like a 32GB card for long capacity and a smaller one as a backup while uploading the videos from the first card. Transcend SDHC Class 6 cards are from a good brand at decent prices.

The default BP-809 battery provided is good for 1 hour of recording, I suggest you match your battery model to the duration of your memory card. For instance, if you have a 32GB card that can store 3 hours of video (at highest quality), get the BP-827 battery that provides 3 hours of battery life.

One more thing: This camcorder is VERY small and light, and its true HD resolution means that it is hard to shoot without making jumpy videos, you need to hold it with 2 hands or more. The built-in stabilizer can only help so much, and will not save you from the butterfly effect: A wing beat on the other side of the planet WILL shake your video. On the other hand, nobody can see the difference if you shot your video drunk or sober, so enjoy the beer. I found a tripod helpful (when shooting from a static location is OK), any tripod should do because the camcorder is so light.

If you need a bag, the Lowepro Edit 110 is just the right size and fits the camcorder with the largest battery, an extra battery, the power adapter, the remote and as many SDHC cards as you need. The camcorder manual also fits in, but it's a pity it's so thick, as it includes 3 languages (English, French, Spanish). There are 23 languages on the camcorder's menus. Cables won't fit. BTW, the camcorder ships without a HDMI cable, you need to get your own if you have a AVCHD-compatible TV and you want to playback on TV directly from the camcorder. Not necessary if your TV has a card reader or is connected to your computer.

Lastly, check your computer rig, you may need an extra large disk (1-2 TB) to store these videos, and more than one if you need to keep the original AVCHD videos for post-production: DVD backups just won't do for this kind of files, unless you have a Blu-ray writer. If you don't need to keep the AVCHD files, burning DVDs is the best way to archive your movies. Just remember that even in HD, DVDs are highly compressed (meaning losing a lot of the quality of your original AVCHD files.) $13 will get you a very basic USB IDE/SATA external adapter, a cheap way to use obsolete hard disks to archive your videos.

Windows 7 update (01/26/2010): While you still need to install the driver tools in Vista Ultimate for MTS playback, none of this is required for Windows 7 Ultimate, it can play the MTS files natively and the Import Wizard will start automatically as soon as you insert the SD card in your computer's card reader.

Read Best Reviews of Canon VIXIA HF200 HD Flash Memory Camcorder w/15x Optical Zoom Here

I Believe this camera is great. It's just above your average models. I've used for a week now filming basic family stuff, kids sports and it works great. It shows great video through a the HDMI cable on my HD TV as well (cable does not come with camera).

The problem I have now is trying to get my computer to read the files. My memory is full and need put on DVD now. After doing some research I found out that camera requires new software and for whatever reason Canon does not provide the proper software to do this with the camera. The files that you will be dealing with, will be CPI or MTS files. I'm not very savvy about this stuff, but I understand now that I have to buy a new program that will read these files and because they are fairly new files, there isn't that many programs out there yet. The programs range from $75 and up, so now you can add this to your cost. After my research every new HD camcorder brand is pretty much having similiar problems.I just stumbled across this. I hope you have a new, big, powerful computer to operate this camcorder as well, if not, your looking at another $1000 for a computer to handle this thing. This camcorder is ahead of it's time right now. Pc's and software are trying to keep up with them.

To look for software, google video editing software, to get a good idea what you're up against.

Like I said, so far the camcorder itself works great. I see a bunch of people complaining about the low light filming being grainy, but if you have ever owned a camcorder, you will know that they all do that. unless you spend over $2000-$2500 for a one.

I gave this 3 stars only because I'm not happy that Canon didn't provide the proper software in the box in the first place.

If any of you ever had any problems with this or found a better solution, please let me know or leave comments.

Want Canon VIXIA HF200 HD Flash Memory Camcorder w/15x Optical Zoom Discount?

After reading many of the earlier reviews I took the plunge and purchased the Canon VIXIA HF200 flash memory camcorder. I upgraded from a Canon mini-DV camcorder because I had purchased my first HDTV from Amazon last Christmas. Of course, I needed an HD camcorder with my new HD television!

I use a Sonnet 21-in-1 multimedia reader&writer Express Card/34 and pop the SD card in to transfer the video clips to my MacBook Pro. Using iMovie '09, this works great. iMovie '09 recognizes it without flaw, and with this software I can choose the clips I want to download from the SD card to my laptop. I use iMovie '09 to organize my videos, and I make the initial selections of clips that I want in each project using iMovie '09. Then, I export to Apple's Intermediate Codec and open this export file in iMovie HD. I prefer the timeline in Apple's older version of iMovie. I also purchased Final Cut Express 4, but haven't cracked that product yet, as it's much more complicated than what I'm used to in iMovie. So, for now, I'm bringing video clips in with the latest version of iMovie, then downconverting and editing in iMovie HD; this works great. I'll eventually learn Final Cut Express and move forward in my video editing hobby. I share all of this because I didn't realize until I read in David Pogue's Missing Manual book (iMovie '09 and iDVD) that I could still use iMovie HD with a flash memory video camera and the AVCHD codec. I'm glad to have discovered this.

As others have said, getting AVCHD encoded video clips into a computer takes LONGER than real-time because of the converting that must take place. My mode of operation with a Canon mini-DV camcorder was to fill a 60-minute tape, then transfer it to the laptop when convenient. I would get it started and come back 60 minutes later to 60-minutes of video ready to edit. Now, I come back 90 minutes later instead. Transfer seems to take about 1.5 times the length of the clips, give or take. For me, this is not a problem when I use my usual transfer and edit process.

If you're looking for instantaneous transfer of files in useable form, though, flash memory won't give it to you -at least with this camera. Others have stated, and I found directions in David Pogue's book stating that it's possible to transfer the files to the computer's hard drive for LATER conversion to useable form for editing. I haven't done this yet, and I would be nervous about deleting the clips from my flash memory card until I had them converted, could see them, and had them backed up on another hard drive. That's when I clear the flash card and re-use it for new video clips. I've had too many lost data situations in the past and I guess I'm a bit overly cautious when I have once-in-a-lifetime video that I don't want to lose. I believe in multiple copies of precious data, video data included. I get around this limitation by having two 16 Gb flash memory cards which, in best mode on this camera, gives me about 1.5 hours of video per card. I have yet to fill one before transferring video.

I also have multiple firewire and/or USB hard drives which I use for backing up video. If I take a long trip I'll just buy a handful of SD chips, along with the two batteries I already own, and shoot away. Each evening it's my practice to download to hard drive anyway, back that up to an external drive, and this seems to work for most situations. It's less expensive to do this with mini-DV tapes (which provide one backup source), but when precious video is involved I don't mind paying for a few extra 16 Gb chips. They're pretty inexpensive on Amazon.com.

I recommend this camera if your habits fit mine, or if you're looking for great-looking video on an HDTV. I have a lot to learn about this camera to get the most out of it, including the editing process. It will serve me for many years to come, as did my Canon mini-DV standard-definition camera.

APRIL 10, 2010 UPDATE:

I've received many nice comments and questions via Amazon, so many that I decided it might be helpful to create a video to show how I move video from a memory chip to my MacBook Pro laptop. If you're a Mac user you might find this helpful. I use iMovie 9 and this tutorial explains the process using that software.

Video (be sure to click on the full screen button):

Save 13% Off

FM Photography McClamp, 26" Long Flexible Articulated Arm with Micro Clamp and 2" Clamp 3302

Need a helping hand when trying to prop a light or your photo subject, but no one's around? The McClamp's what your looking for. It's sturdy, attaches to almost anything and the micro clamp model doesn't tear into whatever you're trying to hold.

To give you an idea I built a macro "lamp" with several led lights on their own wired circuit around some cardboard, with three AA batteries; the whole thing goes around a dslr lens without touching it; no problem at all for the McClamp, and it leaves your hands free to work on your composition.

No 5 stars because it's a little pricey for what it does, even if it does it well.

I bought this with a bit of skepticism I had seen them in use before but the price seemed a bit steep for what I was getting and I had to wonder whether the clamp would be too much pressure on certain items (for instance, a flower's stem). Definitely not even remotely concerned this was built with everything in mind. There is a fabric ring that gently compresses around things like stems, soft padding on the clamp, and the ability to dial down the pressure. It is exceptionally well-designed and seems incredibly sturdy, too. Honestly, I think it was worth every penny. I am very happy with the purchase, far more so than I had anticipated!

Buy FM Photography McClamp, 26" Long Flexible Articulated Arm with Micro Clamp and 2" Clamp 3302 Now

I really like this item to hold a variety of things! It is a little stiff initially but once you get use it for a bit it works nicely, great for flowers and small items that require more hands than you have..:)

Read Best Reviews of FM Photography McClamp, 26" Long Flexible Articulated Arm with Micro Clamp and 2" Clamp 3302 Here

This thing is sort of cool, but it can't hold much weight. I'd hoped to use it with 22 inch 5-in-1 reflectors or scrims and they are too heavy.

Want FM Photography McClamp, 26" Long Flexible Articulated Arm with Micro Clamp and 2" Clamp 3302 Discount?

Fujifilm X-S1 12MP EXR CMOS Digital Camera with Fuijinon F2.8 to F5.6 Telephoto Lens and Ultra-Smoo

First, you must know what you are getting into when you buy/use this camera.

WHAT IT IS NOT: this is not a DSLR replacement for use at high ISO's, it will not replace a top end video capable micro-4/3 camera or similar (ex. GH2/GH3), it's AF is not as fast the Olympus OM-EM5, It's sensor is smaller than m/43 but larger than the average point & shoot and other bridge cameras. It is NOT for pixel-peepers.

NOTE/CAVEAT: If you have a body with a serial number starting with the numbers 21 or 22, this is an old production unit and will most likely have the noted (in other reviews) sensor blooming and lens issues. I have a SN 23X.... (replaced by Fuji with a new camera) and it is perfect for these two issues.

WHAT THIS CAMERA EXCELS AT:

1) Good ISO performance for sensor size up to ISO 800, 1600 useable.

2) Excellent MANUAL zoom, silky smooth. Note, it does have a rubber gasket you can hear (internally) if you put your ear up to it this is a good thing.

3) Optics are sharp, contrasty and the lens alone is worth the price IMO. f/2.8-5.6 is nice for the range.

4) The FPS is nice an speedy if you need it

5) Shoots full HD, but does not have full manual control, but for most causal video people this isn't an issue. If you are a video enthusiast, look elsewhere.

6) Great Fuji auto-white balance

7) Great Fuji colors

8) Full manual control on the photographic side of the camera

9) Weather sealed to a certain level although not completely. Ex. There ARE seals in the lens, battery door, connection port door, SD card door, ,etc. I cannot confirm seals internally around knobs. The Canadian Fuji site called it sealed, but the USA site does not. Keep this in mind.

10) The body, while large, is a joy to hold and use, high quality feel vs. the cheaper plastic cameras

11) The EVF is great IMO nice and large, comparable to my old Panasonic GH1

12) Nice built in flash that is pretty powerful for its size (good to about 20') with excellent exposure

Overall, if you are a photo enthusiast who KNOWS how to get the most from a camera and is willing to learn this camera inside and out it can be very rewarding and is in a class of it's own overall. BUT, if you are looking for a more consumer oriented fun bridge with some better video, look at the Panasonic FZ200 or step up to micro 4/3.

For daylight shooting, this beast is excellent and I do not miss my DLSRs at all. It's AF is quick to lock (with the newer serial numbers IMO) and I've successfully used it for action as well. Overall, for what you get for you money, I don't think you can go wrong. YES, you can get better IQ with a DSLR body. But the tele lenses you will get are slower on the short end (f/3.5) and will put the cost higher in the end if you want to keep cost down. Sure, you could match the DSLR to a nice 70-200mm f/2.8 lens and it would smoke the X-S1, but those lenses are $1000+. For the PACKAGE, it's a great option.

This camera is not the only camera I shoot with, for ultimate image quality, I prefer my Fuji X100 which is a stellar performer. I've shot with many high end DSLR's and some of the best glass around and that's the background for this review. For what it is, the X-S1 is very nice!

After reading some of the negative reviews, I hesitated to order this camera, but decided to give it a try. It arrived a week ago and I began extensive testing for sharpness, image quality and the "orb" problem others mentioned. Two cameras, a Panasonic DMC FZ 150 and the Fujifilm X-S! were set up on tripods side by side and aimed at a tiled roof house about 750 feet away. The lenses were both set a maximum telephoto. The resulting photos, shot in raw, and not processed or sharpened, were viewed on my monitor and on 8.5 x 11 prints. Both photos were acceptably sharp and difficult to distinguish. But, the quality of the picture taken by the Fuji was far superior to that taken by the Panasonic. Colors were richer, and showed a greater range of tonal separation. Detail was rich.

Many more pictures were taken of distant objects with detail. All were sharp and of excellent quality. A bit of sharpening in Photoshop really perked the images up. None of them needed any further adjustment.

To test the orb issue, I photographed some stainless steel railings in bright sunlight and found no issue at all. I then shot a streetlight, head on after dark. The first picture did show the light as a white, detail less circle. A second shot, spot metered on the light and given 2 stops of increased exposure gave a well exposed and detailed image that showed detail in the lens of the light.

In brief, the build quality appears excellent and the digital viewfinder is as good as it gets; almost, but not quite, rivaling an optical finder. The lcd screen is very usable in bright sunlight.

The camera is expensive, but for someone seeking high quality and downsizing from a DSLR with multiple lenses it is worth a look.

Buy Fujifilm X-S1 12MP EXR CMOS Digital Camera with Fuijinon F2.8 to F5.6 Telephoto Lens and Ultra-Smoo Now

I haven't had the camera long enough to give a complete review, but I can already answer some of the comments made in other reviews.

Softness at Extreme Telephoto : Based on the test shots I have taken, this is not an issue with the sample that I have. Even wide open, I would have no issues with the sharpness for a camera of this type. While clearly not something that would rival the results from a Canon prime telephoto, on a 1Ds body with which I am familiar, for a camera /lens combination that is only one 20th of the price, the results are excellent. My sample does have some back focussing, out by about six inches when focussed at infinity, so this might account for the softness experienced by another reviewer.

Lens sagging : No sign of this with my sample.

Blue lens flare : No sign of this with my sample. In addition color fringing is noticeably absent.

Other Comments.

Image noise : Not surprisingly, the high ISO performance of this camera is not as good as my X-100. The X-100 is excellent up to 800, and good at 1600. The X-S1 is about a stop worse, very good to 400 and good at 800.

Build Quality : As others have said, the build quality is excellent.

Responsiveness : Something not mentioned as much as I think it should be is how responsive the camera is. Focussing is very fast and shutter delay is short enough to not be noticeable, which is a huge plus.

Conclusion.

So far the camera lives up to the reviews that are enthusiast about it. I will add more comments as I gain more experience with it.

Read Best Reviews of Fujifilm X-S1 12MP EXR CMOS Digital Camera with Fuijinon F2.8 to F5.6 Telephoto Lens and Ultra-Smoo Here

I will say a few things. Build quality is outstanding. No doubt about that.

I have had it a couple of weeks and used it under a good many situations to get a feel for it. I really like it. But let me get right to the "negatives". But please understand that all cameras are trade offs of one thing for another. There are far more positives than negatives.

1. Image quality.. People have a strange idea of what image quality is and they toss the term around. I think a lot of people who have knocked the image quality and said it is no better than an average point and shoot have not explored all the settings because it is far more than point and shoot image quality. There is a lot you can change in terms of setting and how you shoot. So it is possible to get great images and they are far more than point and shoot images. The images could be sharper under some circumstances but in others it is really good. The thing is that for the most part the average person is not going to notice the difference. The image quality issue is VERY dependent on the circumstances. The macro is excellent. Portrait is good and acceptable but a G 12 would do better. Outdoor is just fine even with lower light and even at 600mm zoom I was pleasently suprised. Also there are different modes and image quality will be effected by those. But IF you really want to pick... the lens could be sharper BUT the sharpness will not be an issue for most people and it would not be noticed until you blow up a picture. Funny how people that don't shoot much and cannot compose often will get hung up on stats. For the average person looking for nice pictures with advanced possibilities sharpness in this camera is not something to get hung up on. A person should be improving other factors in their photography and not obsessing over pixels in situations where you would forget about them anyway.

2. Autofocus. This could be better and snappier. It works but it is not up to the standard of the camera. It can be skittish

3. Ease of use and user enjoyment.. Well it is really really a pleasure to use without a doubt. It has many preset programs in it that could really help a person get nice picture especially if that person is looking for better than point and shoot pictures but does not want to fumble with an SLR or lenses. It bothers me to see people with disposible income and these expensive SLRS waltzing around snapping without a clue. They would be better with this. Hey, if you really have the skills to negotiate and manipulate an SLR in a very versitile way then that is a good thing but IF you want to drop the ego and don't care about impressing anyone when you are not a highly skilled photographer you are better with this. Yeah this camera is a pleasure to use and so versitile. It will accomadate most all situations on a family trip or day of taking photos of animals or whatever...

The camera has lots of great features and is laid out well. The viewfinder is electronic and really great. The LED screen is sharp enough and great.

Here is the bottom line. On one hand you have SLRs. We all know that their images are great. But lets take the average person what wants better than average pictures and wants to be creative. They may not want to take the kids to the park or the zoo with an SLR and a bunch of lenses. They may not want to be changing lenses. The reality is that if all they are going to do is snap then get a regular and save some money. If the snapper is wanting sharper images and has money get a G 15 or something. Or take an SLR with a 50mm lens. But let's take the person that takes the family on a trip. They go to the zoo. Well they want to snap the kids in front of a zebra. But then they want a close up of an animal in the distance. Then they see a flower and want a really nice macro. Then they want to do a portrait. Then this and then that at different lightings and distances. This camera will do that. Then it gets to be the end of the day and lighting is getting lower but you see a seagul in the distance and you want a zoom at 620mm. Well this camera will pull that off fairly well. So it is very versitile. Yes, you will suffer some image sharpness under many circumstances but as I have said most of the time that is a non issue and will not be perceived. To overcome that on your trip you need an SLR or smaller version of one with all the lenses. It is your choice.

I would say that for a person that wants more than a point and shoot but does not want to go to SLR with all the hassels and benefits then this is a great thing. A person that has become desireous to expand beyond their point and shoot and get infinately better pictures and opportunities will like it. A kids birtday party, trip to the zoo, vacation or.. You see some kind of bird on your lawn and want a real close picture. Well you won't get it with the average point and shoot and with an SLR the bird may be gone by the time you change lenses.

So you see you get ease, versitility, high build quality and great pictures at the expense of some image sharpness. Image sharpness that many times will not be dectected. In fact most of the time. And please remember that IF you wanted a 620mm lens in an SLR what it would cost. You see balancing a superzoom lens with a macro at a cost a family can afford is not an easy thing to do. I think people forget that. This lens goes from super macro to superzoom and all points in between. You are going to have to comprimise somewhere. I mean it is like that in life. A general surgeon may be just fine for the operation but the specialty surgeon will do the job a bit better. But the question is that in the operation is the difference important? Many times no. Sometimes yes..

Lastly.. Everyone has an opinion. Many times their opinions are based on some obsessive notion or whatever. So when people say it is no different than a point and shoot, check it out. This is what you do. You go on line and you look at the pictures people are producing with the camera. You look at the good and not so good. You look at a lot of galleries. You don't listen to image quality reviews so much because they can have and agenda. You will see that this machine can get excellent photos and they are far better than an limited point and shoot. Sometimes those photos will be up to an SLR and other times they will not. More often than not they will be in between. A very fair comprimise for the reasonible price. And make no mistake you are getting a lot of bang for your buck with this camera.

So sharpness often will not matter and it will matter very very little IF you are not blowing things up or viewing without printing. BUT IF.. If you have a photographic need for tack sharpness or you are obsessed over it and have the money to spend then this is not a good choice for you. But I think that sometimes a person gets hung up on something like sharpness when it really will not come into play for their situation. This camera is plenty sharp enough for most people and especially considering all other factors.

If you are making a decision just go look at galleries and a lot of them...

Have a nice day...!

6/12/13**** Addendum

Ok it has been 6 months of a lot of almost daily shooting. I just wanted to say that this is the camera I go for the most and I do that because it is the most versatile. The more I use it the more I love it. I have a number of other cameras and they all have their own respective advantages. Leica, Panasonic ect.. BUT this is the one I go for mostly. If you are a family I highly advise it. You want something that you will get all the shots with and this is the best thing going in my opinion. The more you use it the more you find that you learn to get the great shots. It is really nice right away but as you shoot over time you really begin to appreciate it. Just explore and gradually you will become one with the camera and get all those shots of the kids and places you go. Oh and Fuji has a website where owners post their pics and it is really good. Also the quality of the build is better than most as it is an x series and we work hard for our money so it feels good to get something solid and obviously superior rather than just a tinny plastic junk. It is really built fine. Every time I pick it up it feels like quality in my hands. I am so so glad I dished out a little more money. Over the long term it was not much at all to get the quality I got. This is a camera a family will USE and won't tie you down. If you don't have a usable camera then what good is it?

Want Fujifilm X-S1 12MP EXR CMOS Digital Camera with Fuijinon F2.8 to F5.6 Telephoto Lens and Ultra-Smoo Discount?

I have been using P&S for years, and this is the first camera I own that allows me to do more. The reason I am getting a Fuji is that I always like the pictures taken by my good old S2800 years ago. Then along the way, I changed cameras from time to time, brand names include Panasonic, Casio, Canon, with the latest being the Nikon S8200. All these cameras produced good pictures, but not at the point where you can feel the color jumping out of the screen, including a Canon DSLR from my sister.

I also understand that this X-S1 should not be compared to P&S and I didn't mean to. I am a lazy person who wants to do more with a camera but without carrying a whole bunch of lenses, swapping them from situation to situation. This all-in-one superzoom really helped this big issue out for me. The manual zoom lens moves this camera from Bridge Camera class to another one very similar to DSLR. Few days ago I bought a Sony SLT-A55V with a Sony 18-250mm lens for a friend. With more adjustment, the pictures are just as good, or more detailed as the Sony DSLR. Therefore, the more I use this camera, the more I understand it, and in turn the more I like it. There're few settings I have changed from the default settings:

Flash is lowered to -1/3

Exposure compensation to be one notch below the middle

Metering, or AE setting to be Multi

Some people says photos are good up to ISO800, what I do for this is to lower the resolution to 6MP, which is still good for Letter Size print

The purpose for these settings is to reduce the overall exposure by the default settings. Personally, I feel the camera tend to over-exposed a bit by all default settings. Coupling with limiting ISO, I can achieve great result from the camera. Shooting far away objects such as birds, kayak from Golden Gate Bridge was absolute enjoyment. Again, I just can't emphasize enough about the beautiful color reproduction from Fuji cameras, and X-S1 is no exception.

Save 10% Off

VideoSecu WDR Weatherproof Outdoor CCTV Home Surveillance Security Camera Infrared Day Night Vision

The camera has a great picture both in day and night. The quality of the image is acceptable, clear enough. The night vision is better than I thought. I can see any movement that happens in my carport throughout the night. They shipped quickly too! I am so satisfied with my purchase. I recommend this product.

Perhaps my expectations were too high. Daylight use is OK, not as sharp as I was hoping but probably normal for a video camera. The night functioning is useless. The images are just ghostly outlines. I have the system set for motion detection and there is so much image noise at night it seems to trigger the motion detector and it records all night long, even though there is nothing actually going on. Trespassers at night need have no fear of this camera. All it would really show me is the time of the intrusion.

Buy VideoSecu WDR Weatherproof Outdoor CCTV Home Surveillance Security Camera Infrared Day Night Vision Now

Sigma SD9 3.54MP Digital SLR Camera

unlike some reviewers, i have actually seen and held this camera. while i only took 3 pictures, simply loading them and having a look is shocking. this camera and the underlying X3 chip blow away everything in digital photography today. getting all three colors (rather than one like all other digital cameras) in each pixel gives you images you can easily enlarge without loss and artifacts. this camera easily blows away cameras costing many times more.

this isn't a true 3 MP camera. it is more like a 9 MP. but better.... there is no longer a reason to not go digital.

getting 3 colors per pixel means no interpolation. that in turn means sharper, truer color, photos without artifacts. in short, digital photos without the digital look. some of the photos taken with this camera are as good as medium format film images.

digital is not as good as film, it is now better.

I got mine last week, and it's image quality is the best of any digital camera.

My only complaint is that for the price they skimped on the little things... Specifically one of the battery doors is poorly made (I broke it after inserting the batteries :-( )

But after shooting pictures almost continuously over the holidays, I have to say that the Sony 717 doesn't compare.

Lance

Buy Sigma SD9 3.54MP Digital SLR Camera Now

I'm a bit late in writing this review since I've had my SD9 for one year.

The image quality of photos using the SD9 can be quite stunning. The level of sharpness achieved by the Foveon sensor is amazing it can resolve detail that Bayer sensor cameras (all other digital cameras fall into this group) simply cannot. Couple this camera with one of Sigma's "EX" lenses, particularly the super-sharp 50mm EX macro lens, and you'll love the results. I enjoy macro photography and this camera is excellent at macro photography.

I'm certainly not in the league of a real photographer as I'm just a casual type who enjoys taking pictures. As they say, the proof is in the picture and I've seen the proof! Forget about the megapixel rating and the fact that the Sigma is "only" 3.4 MP. The Foveon sensor has 3.4 million photosensors for each primary color that's 10.2 total MP while a 6 MP Bayer sensor has 6 MP for all three primary colors.

Why a four star rating rather than five? This camera is not without it's issues, like all cameras. The SD9 is not a very good low-light performer. If you need ISO speeds faster than 100 then the SD9 may not be for you. High ISO shots are noisy although you can get very usable high ISO photos if the conditions are ideal. The SD10 addressed this issue. The SD9 does not have a built-in flash but those units are not suitable for serious flash work anyway. This camera can only use Sigma SA mount lense so the choice in lenses is not as wide as for a Canon, Nikon, or Minolta user but Sigma makes some very, very good lenses and they certainly offer more choices than I can avail myself of. If you want in-camera jpg files, look elsehwere. The SD9 shoots only in RAW format and you have to process the photos. This is actually the best way to shoot, there is so much that can be done with a RAW file that one cannot do with a TIFF or jpg. The Sigma Photo Pro software is a gem of an application that is extremely powerful and easy to use.

Again, look at the results and you'll see that this camera is an extremely capable performer.

Read Best Reviews of Sigma SD9 3.54MP Digital SLR Camera Here

i have had this camera for almost 2 years now and am still in love with it. i use the EX series 15-30mm lens and there isn't a situation i have found where this camera doesn't kick the of any other digital camera (except for maybe the new SD10). i have a friend with a Canon that cost a ridiculous $9,000 and her pictures look like junk in comparison. i recently took a photo i took with my SD9 at a canyon in new mexico and had it blown up to over 3 feet wide. of course, the file size is absolutely huge, but the print out is stunning. you cannot even see the pixels.

i love this camera. it is amazingy easy to use and the pictures come out wonderfully.

Want Sigma SD9 3.54MP Digital SLR Camera Discount?

Well, this camera is something special and I have been compelled write this review because of couple of reasons. For the first, here the reasons. I read many bad , negative reviews of this camera and in the same time all those people who actually used it told how much they have being amazed by the picture quality it produces. So I've decided to try. The camera's images are not amazed they are stunned. The image quality is so high that it left me speechless for the first.

I'm just wandering about those who left negative reviews about it? The CNET review, that named it "mediocre SLR camera" is just a plain lie. In my opinion they giving point for those who gives more money, it's it. Another interesting "review", I read from Ken Rockwell (really gifted photo artist!, no questions!), who reviewed this camera without even try it!

So let start. First of all, it is NOT 3.5M camera. It is AT LEAST 10M camera, but megapixels in the traditional meaning just are not applicable here. This camera produces NEGATIVES. This negative is result of 10M photo elements. In the same time any of 6M cameras has HALF OF THEM GREEN and ONLY 25% red and another 25% blue. If we speak about "image quality" using this kind of "resolution" , this camera produces 14M images. In the same time the "real" resolution of those "6M" cameras stand about 1.5M, the everything else is a pure deceiving interpolation. I see that Cannon and NIkon, aren't happy to see this Sigma on the market, since it MUCH SUPERIOR to any camera they make they started to discredit it.

I do not say it is an ideal, but it close. Much closer than everything else that feels like SLR.

This Sigma produces PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES. I mean it. There's full range of amazing continuos beautiful halftones as you can see on the best reversible films. The pictures are spectacular.

Since it is real photographic tool, you come back to the true that photography and it is about light. Your raw pictures will normally produce 3000 by 4500 huge images that is not interpolating, they just "enlargements" from digital negative. It reviles as many details that ANY other camera can't produce. There are 14M cameras on the market, but they DO NOT MUCH this SIgma in the meaning of photography. I can blow my raw image 4 times more and it still looking better than those from 14M Canon. By the way, those image from Cannon show horrible color reproduction, especially in the red. For example two closely colored redish colors coming out the same!

This Sigma saves colors! It saves the real colors, not the estimations, not the interpolations but the real thing. Camera has just the everything that it has to have, including the high speed synchronization up to 1/6000 !!!

The lens from Sigma just as good(or better) as any other lenses from Nikon , Cannon or Minolta. Even cheap $100 tag slow glass is of very good optical quality. Yes/ for $100 you're getting slow lenses, but it almost distortion free and high contrast! But fro $300 you can get perfectly fast, noticeably bright zoom that at least as good as any lens from "leading companies".

Camera is very well constructed, it handles as it should be, the focusing system is fast, the screen is bright and clear, all controls location are very clever and logical. I like this camera and you're going to like it too. No boundaries anymore. You can print image as large as you need, no questions. In two, three years Foveon will overcome. I