Sanyo VPC-CG65 6MP MPEG-4 Flash Memory Digital Camcorder (Silver)

I've been reasonably impressed with Sanyo's offerings in terms of digital cameras in the past and have used the predecessors to the CG6, including the HD1 and VPC-C6. Both cameras are reasonable, but were absolutely hopeless in low light conditions (ISO400), the CG6 has an ISO of 1600 (finally) giving one of Sanyo's offering standard low light capabilities on par with the other high quality cameras, meaning I could video most of my more embarrassing pub crawls, but not my night club adventures.

The mic (built into the screen) is surprisingly sensitive, especially to sounds emanating close by, but very resistant to wind and background noise including tapping or brushing of the mic.

The video quality is 640x480 and is in MP4 format (quicktime) which is comparable in quality to the latest iTunes movie downloads of the same resolution, though you can adjust it to be of lower quality. The photos are 6 megapixels which speaks for itself.

PC or Mac Connection is done by a standard USB cable which also doubles as a charger. Battery life also seems reasonable as does the charge time, but having never filmed for more than an hour without a recharge I would be cautious on long trips.

Despite a few minor drawbacks I would highly recommend this camera, it's reasonably durable and fits easily in ones pocket or a generic soft compact camera case. Personally I take it everywhere, I like to start filming and then pass the camera among friends for a few minutes, after a short while people forget it's there, after which you're left with a multiple perspective view of the previous night, very much worth the high price.

My only complaints would be that:

1.) It does not take rapid photographs like the Canon range can, nor can it take photographs one after another in rapid succession.

2.) No built-in lens cap, (there is a removable one that comes in the box).

3.) Slight noise with still pictures (vastly improved over previous models, but slightly more noticeable than with other brands).

4.) Awkward to stand upright on a surface, but possible.

5.) Little warning before the battery runs out.

I've been extremely happy with the new Sanyo VPC-CG65 since I bought it. I first saw the VPC-CG6 (younger brother) at Walmart and instantly loved the small form factor. After doing a bit of research I found the CG65 with is identical except for the H.264 mpeg codec being built-in. I'm an Apple fan and so I knew I wanted that feature! :)

The camera is great, small, fast, handles the large sd cards perfectly. I plan on putting it to great use in a few weeks during summer vacation. So far, the videos I've shot with this camera are terrific. Close-up's and details are crisp and clear. The auto-focus is dead-on for the most part. I have no complaints as far as that goes. I carry the thing around daily in my pocket..something I couldn't do with a camcorder.

I know most photo camera's can record video..but this is more of a video camcorder that can take pictures. I like the feature that allows you to snap a picture while in the middle of recording a video, but I wasn't crazy about how it paused momentarily. Could have been related to my card speed (it's not a fast sd card) but the feature still worked.

I'd recommend getting additional batteries if using this for extended periods of time. But I'd recommend that for any camera. You can never have too much power.

As far as cons go, the one time I used the camera for about an hour to record my brother-in-laws wedding, I noticed the camera got kinda warm. I hadn't noticed that to be the norm, but I was doing a lot of recording that day. And it could have been related to the battery too since I ran it down to empty. That was of course before buying the extra batteries. See above.

I haven't played with many of the built-in features yet other than white balance and video quality. I prefer recording everything on the SHQ (Super High Quality) setting but it does record at a pretty high bitrate. I also own an Apple TV and when I try playing the videos in their SHQ format on Atv it has trouble with that. No fault of the camera..I just think the Atv is a bit underpowered for the high bitrate. Regular HQ recording play well on Atv though. I still record at the higher setting so that I have more details when I go to do editing on the iBook. I can always lower the bandwidth during export so it's not an issue to be concerned with. I don't think anyone can shoot a video professionally in one take and so the chances of needing to put un-edited SHQ footage on the Atv is unlikely.

As I stated in the headline, I'd recommend spending the extra few bucks to get the H.264 codec built in. It's a matter of personal preference but it does save space and it's quickly becoming an industry standard.

After vacation I'll repost with any changes to my opinion, but as it stands now, I'm happy with my purchase.

Buy Sanyo VPC-CG65 6MP MPEG-4 Flash Memory Digital Camcorder (Silver) Now

I'm quite impressed, especially with the quality of stills. And there are many photo and video settings that can be changed.

After using the camera for a few hours, I need to work out how to hold it. I have average sized hands and firmly holding the camera is tricky, especially when it's time to push the still or video button. I handled the HD2 and it fits better in my hand, but doesn't fit my wallet.

The flash is weak and is only effective within 6 feet, but that's what I expect from such a small flash.

The menu system is very intuitive and easy to navigate. I especially like the ability to assign menu functions to the joystick, that's a great idea. I assigned AF lock, ISO, Flash and Focus to the joystick for quick access.

I'm a stickler for image quality (acknowledging the obvious limitations of this camera), so everything is set to the highest quality. The video is better than Hi8, but definately not DVD quality.

I purchased two 2GB Kingston 50x Elite Pro cards, one card came with a free reader. Why didn't I purchase a 4 or 8 SDHC card? I don't want to put all my eggs in one basket if that basket might be lost or corrupted during a one-time event. Also, a spare battery is a must-have.

I've been reading the forums on this camera, and I looked at lots of sample clips, so I know the limitations of the Xacti, but in the end, the portability trumps video quality. I would feel self-conscious every time I whipped out my old camcorder, but with the CG65 it's small enough to be inconspicuous and I can shoot more candid videos.

After all, what's the point of having a camcorder if you dread lugging it around? The CG65 can't match the video quality of a dedicated digital camcorder, but you'll shoot a lot more video...and the stills are excellent.

Read Best Reviews of Sanyo VPC-CG65 6MP MPEG-4 Flash Memory Digital Camcorder (Silver) Here

I should preface what follows with the statement that I bought this to replace an "ancient" miniDV camcorder the original Canon ZR, which has less than stellar autofocus and low-light performance. Even so, I enjoyed using it thoroughly, but was getting tired of the weight and, more importantly, the hassle of downloading from tapes to my computer. Even with Firewire, a thankless and time consuming task.

So tapes were out, and I don't trust hard drives, so HDD was out too. That left the Sanyo and assorted DVR camcorders. No doubt there are many wonderful DVR camcorders, and it is quite likely that the better ones take better movies, but I wasn't going to get something that needed me to buy expensive additinal media with a 20 minute recording time.

I absolutely am stunned with the quality of this hybrid camera. It takes movies that look better than my old miniDV camcorder, blows away digital still camera movie modes, and the picture quality compares favorably to other mid-entry level digital compacts.

The absolute truth behind any great video or photo is this: you better have your camera with you. And this camera makes you want to bring it everywhere. Since I bought it, it hasn't left my side, and I've captured more video of my child in the last week than I have in the last several years, just because the camera is always there.

Sure it could be improved, but Sanyo did a pretty good job. The flash positioning is a bit odd off to the side, but I haven't noticed any vignetting, and the flash isn't as weak as the size would indicate. I suspect that was done to avoid errant fingers covering it during operation, as it IS pretty easy to get so engrossed that you don't notice until a couple seconds in that your finger has strayed to the top of the lens.

The menu system is clear and intuitive, and unlike some reviewers in other forums, I found it easy and logical to use. The screen is good and the overall feeling of the unit is solid, considering the price point. The battery life is not stellar, but not bad either pretty much what one would expect from the size and capacity. I was able to squeeze about an hour from it, much of it reviewing and taking flash pictures as well as making movies.

The shake reduction feature I can't say much about it. I have rock steady hands, and haven't noticed more than normal amounts of camera movement.

The niggles: in low light, focusing becomes frustrating, if it works at all. Yes, there's a work around by simply setting up manual focusing using a distance based scale ( it works! ), but an AFassist light would have been tremendously welcomed.

The case, while undeniably "sexy" and svelte, could have done with some rubberization. Put the strap on RIGHT AWAY when this arrives, and don't handle the camera without it, lest it slip.

To sum up: if this keeps working as it is now, I'll be blissfully happy for a long time. I highly recommend this for the family snapshooter to whom portability, value, and simple the fun factor are important.

UPDATE: I can't figure out how to lower the starred rating, or I would. I've now owned two of these and ended up returning them both. I took the first one on vacation with me, and while it performed brilliantly function-wise and was a kick to use, almost every video I took had a rectangular ghost image floating in the lower left quadrant of the screen. It was particularly noticeable when zooming in.

I searched user forums and found very little information, so I hoped I had simply gotten a bad unit.

Enter the replacement unit same model same problem, but in an even worse location top of center. To be fair, it only shows up when shooting with bright light outdoors ( not even into sun, it shows up when you are facing away from the sun or it is overcast ) , but isn't that exactly what you'd buy a camcorder for??? So, back #2 went, too. I noticed that both cameras also have a really bad flare problem which is exacerbated by the absence of a lens hood and the relative proximity of the lens to the front of the camera body.

I really wished I could have lived with it, but I really don't want to have my videos ruined by ghostlike gray rectangles in nearly every clip. Sanyo, get with the program already and fix that.

Want Sanyo VPC-CG65 6MP MPEG-4 Flash Memory Digital Camcorder (Silver) Discount?

I must admit that I was skeptical of this camera. It comes in such a small package I was worried that the quality of the photos/video would be low. I have been pleasantly surprized by the quality of both the video and photos. It is really a neat camera and always draws comments. It easily fits in your pocket and is up and running in seconds. My only problem is that with the blessing of its small size is also the problem of having large hands and fingers. Its difficult to figure out a good way to hold the camera. The slick plastic exterior doesn't help (rubberized padding or grips would help). I find it difficult to use with one hand, which seems silly that you would have to use two hands on such a small, simple camera. All said, I really like the camera, it works as claimed. Quality good. Importing into my Mac, super easy and quick. I just wish it was easier to hold. People with large hands and big fingers may want to keep looking.

Kodak PlaySport (Zx3) HD Waterproof Pocket Video Camera (Purple)

OK lets start off with this camera is $149 keep that in mind.

The 5.3MP still photos are fairly good, not to bad, but remember this is a video camera first

a dedicated 5MP still photo camera will take much better photos, but again hey these aren't to shabby it just depends on what your trying to do. Quick shots here and there...excellent and better than any cell phone I've had. At a wedding where you want crystal clear and sharp photos....well not so much.

The HD video camera is pretty nice, easy to use and I was just stunned at the digital zoom.

It actually works and works well, not to blocky or grainy...more so at the extreme 4x level but at 2x to about 3x the camera compensated nicely and actually cleared up the image...not sure how they do it, but they do.

As others have noted, with rapid movement of the camera you will notice your image jumps or shakes.

Now remember what I told you to keep in mind $149. Yes it does have that little "feature", but it's not

a $299 video camera with a higher quality lens and CCD. Slow down, don't go from left to right or up and

down at 100MPH and it's not bad. Moving images within the video are fine, it's just if you move the camera

itself very rapidly you will notice it.

I tried the 3 HD video modes, and it also has a standard resolution mode as well that I did not try.

I compared all 3 with and with out the image stabilization on which did not seem to improve or degrade the

image at all.

At 720p 30 fps Not to bad, noticed the jumpyness or shakyness of the image as I moved left to right in my test,

but slow down and it's not to bad.

At 720p 60 fps Now were getting better, really not bad at all, again not $300 video camera good, but

pretty darn nice, and clearer and the shakyness of the video smoothed out a bunch, again slow down in your

movements for best quality.

At 1080p 30fps Nice quality...really nice, but the jumpyness of the video is back, you have to take it a bit

slower but nice quality all in all.

I did not try the underwater mode, but assume it works as advertised everything else has so far.

Now I throughly loved the fact that there are no CD's with this camera, nothing in the box to load.

You simply plug in the provided USB cable and the software...every bit of it and all the drivers you need for

the camera are built right in and install on your PC from the camera...this is an excellent feature, I always

misplace the CD's and have to download from the website anyhow.

Speaking of downloading from the website ... this camera is flash upgradeable with new firmware I went to the

Kodak website and found that there was an upgrade I could download to correct a few minor anomalies that they

found...cool so hopefully this camera gets even more corrections in the near future and maybe a feature update

someday?

I also loved the fact that ALL the cables came with the camera. HDMI, USB, and Component video cables...

All of them... they can charge you at least $10 for each individual cable, but they give them to you with

the camera for $149, now how great is that ?!?!

As at least one other reviewer has said, yes there is no case or protective sleeve that comes with the camera,

but I would take the cables over a case anyday, you know what ever they included it wouldn't be what you wanted.

Either they gave you a sleeve and you wanted a case for your accessories or they gave you a case and you didn't

want to carry all the accessories so you go out and buy yourself a protective sleeve or pouch. So just go get what you want ...

I myself purchased the Kodak Case that Amazon recommended to me .... also a nice purchase, perfect size not to big,

not to small and has a little accessory area that you can carry one of the cables and a spare battery if you need.

This camera feels rugged and well built. It's easy to use, lots of features like image stabilization and face

tracking, it comes with all the cables, free software that's always with you in the camera, and costs only $149.

So not to bad at all, and my conclusion is this if your looking for a sharp and crisp still photo camera drop the

$100 just for that and buy one, if your looking for a excellent video quality camera drop the $300 just for that

and buy one. But....If your looking for a pretty nice, simple and decent quality camera that does it all and

is rugged enough to go out in the rain or underwater drop $149 and buy this one.

I've included a video I compiled and edited down to show the different resolutions and the photos. Keep in mind

that while your viewing that this is an flv file and the actual quality that the camera will give you will be

much higher than what I was able to upload to Amazon, meaning you'll get better quality than what you see on here.

I shot this using the Kodak PlaySport while snorkeling off of Ixtapa, Mexico. The water wasn't the clearest, but I did get pretty good results. It looked really great in the pool. It also looks great above water! I use it at my son's baseball games and I have been amazed at the quality. Hands down the best thing about this camera is the size. It's so easy to slip in a pocket and just carry around. Great little vacation camera. My only complaint is that the control wheel is a little small. I would often accidentally stop recording while trying to zoom in or out. You get used to it though and it is a minor annoyance. I highly recommend this camera.

Buy Kodak PlaySport (Zx3) HD Waterproof Pocket Video Camera (Purple) Now

I am a Canon diehard fan. But Canon does not have anything that compares to Kodak Playsport HD waterproof pocket video camera. At 1080P the video recording is acceptable. But, at 720p and 60 frames per second this camera rocks, the results are great. I have used it around and in water, the blue filter helps under water. I am planning to use this for our Disney World vacation this year in the Water Parks.

This camera takes 5MP HD Stills, so now I have a camera that can take video and stills on demand wet or dry. I have other camera's in the same category like Flip and Samsung both do not compare, even at 720p 60 frames per second. $150.00 pricetag is also very affordable.

Easy to carry, very user friendly to move files from the camera to the computer or directly to Youtube. Nightvision would be nice but most of my recordings will be in Daylight. Bottom line great camera and I have no cons to talk about.

Read Best Reviews of Kodak PlaySport (Zx3) HD Waterproof Pocket Video Camera (Purple) Here

Over Christmas, my wife decided to award my awesomeness by getting me a Zi6. I loved this camera like a fat kid likes cake and took it with me everywhere that I went. Suddenly, my daughter was living her own personal Truman Show and everyone on my Facebook friends list was subject to video after video that I'd shot just about anywhere that we were of her being cute.

Not even a half a year had passed before I was totally devoted to the idea of the Zi6 but still wanting something with a little more horsepower under the hood (Image Stabilization, Facial Detection, Backlight Suppression). I was planning to go with the Zi8 but then I found this little bad boy. The Zx3 is essentially like the dashing, more adventurous midget version of the Zi8. It has the Zi8's guts but in a pint sized, water-proof body.

Pros:

1. Its freaking waterproof! In my opinion, this is almost 100% necessary with a camera that you carry around with you all the time. I'm often too stupid to come in out of the rain so the mere fact that this camera can take the moisture makes it a perfect fit for me.

2. Facial Detection, it works! The camera does an outstanding job of metering from whoever's grill that I happen to be getting all up in while using it. There's a noticeable lag when panning from the shadows to some sun-worshiping hippy but it's not that much. Maybe 1/3 of a second.

3. The image stabilization keeps my shots steady even when I'm jogging behind my 4 year old little girl as she goes from one place to the other being totally riot. It's digital instead of optical so it isn't perfect but it's still a far cry better than the Zi6. It¡¦s definitely a welcome upgrade as my footage no longer looks quite so much like every scene in Cloverfield.

4. I don't use the backlight suppression as much as I thought that I would (mostly don't need it) but its nice having it there.

5. I personally think that the low light performance of this camera is quite crunk! I've read lots of other reviews with people complaining about it but these folks probably complain that they don't get a side of caviar whenever they order a drive through happy meal. It's a pocket-sized camera. In my opinion, the Zx3 has the best low light resolution that you're going to find without upgrading to anything larger and more financially damaging to your checking account.

Cons

1. The thing runs on a proprietary battery so, unlike the Zi6 there's no more relying on AA's and Viagra to keep me going all day long. Kodak says that you'll get 90 minutes out of a full charge but they're lying to you like a bunch of dirty liars. Expect an hour without previewing.

2. Oddly, the 1080p recording mode doesn't make that much of a difference. The Zi6 maxed out at 720p and definitely got a worse picture than this Zx3 but that's mainly due to the internal processing differences between to two devices. It's not really a complaint, I guess. I've just found that 720p at 60fps is just as good or better than 1080p at 30fps.

3. This camera's lack of a macro mode makes it impossible for me to film my fungal infections to email to my doctor for diagnosis.

4. No case was provided! :( WTF Kodak? My Zi6 came with a case. True, it wasn't a very good case but it was there and I loved it! This one doesn't have one. I'm currently using one of my kid's unmatched socks to keep the screen and lens from getting scratched while it's in my pocket. Why does Kodak want me to be so ghetto?

5. The codec records in the .mov file format. This format is big and really annoying to edit in as it eats up processing power and makes your computer stupid. Know going into this that you're going to have to convert your files into a more manageable format before splicing together the next Citizen Kane.

All in all, I'd say that the Zx3 is pretty much the most amazing thing that I've owned ever since my wife got me my Zi6. The better image quality alone makes it worth the $150 that I paid for it but it's also waterproof! My wife didn't know that before I dropped it into my koi pond. The look on her face alone was priceless and worth every dollar spent.

Want Kodak PlaySport (Zx3) HD Waterproof Pocket Video Camera (Purple) Discount?

End Result: The video attached here was shot at 720p, 60 frames per second, uploaded and processed by youtube.com, then downloaded and posted to this review to show the quality of the final results you can achieve online. The camera will shoot even higher resolution at 1080p.

Overall: I have been using this tiny camera hard now for eight months, and I have almost nothing but praise for it. It's the size of a cell phone, shoots HD, has image stabilization, contains software for making movies and uploading them to YouTube and other social media site, is rugged, water proof, and best of all, shoots better video than the Flip cameras. The "almost" is minor, in that most users shooting for more than 20 minutes in the wild will want a second battery. It really is best-of-class in tiny video cams, and nothing else comes close to its environmental ruggedness. Buy it. Have a blast. Kodak did it right.

Hardware: I purchased the Black PlaySport ($150), the Kodak High-Speed 16 GB 60x Class 4 SDHC Flash Memory Card ($40), the Kodak 1706290 Resilient 1 Camera Case ($7), and a tiny flexi-leg tripod ($6). The camera comes with a wrist strap, USB charger, USB cable to connect to your computer or charger, and an HDMI cable for your HD TV. The enclosed user's guide is minimal in its explanation of the controls, and does not include shooting tips, but the camera is so simple to operate that you really don't need much more. All components worked flawlessly out of the box. The leash runs through a strong hole in the camera body, and you can use the wrist strap or even run a long leash to your belt for extended-arm shooting while paddling or skiing. I attach the tiny tripod to my life jacket with a leash, and do most of my shooting with the tripod stuffed in the life jacket's breast pocket and camer facing forward.

Charging: Initial charging and all my subsequent charges via USB took about 20 minutes. The USB cable has a standard plug on one end, and a micro-SUB on the other, which is great for me, because my Blackberry car charger also uses a micro-USB. When I shoot intermittently, turning the camera on and off a lot to save battery, I am getting 20-30 minutes of video at 720P at 60 frames per second. You can shoot while charging, which is great for the car or indoors where you have wall power. If you plan to do lots of outdoor shooting, get at least one spare battery. Charging and HDMI ports are on the right side of the camera behind a gasketed waterproof door. The battery and flash card are on the left side of the camera behind a separate gasketed door. Both doors seal very well if you keep the gaskets clean.

Controls: The center select button is used to start and stop shooting, take a still picture, or start and stop playback. Surrounding it is a black control ring that lets you choose from 720P, 720P-60FPS, 1080P or still shots. When shooting, the ring lets you zoom in and out, displaying the zoom level in a red bar-graph on the display. The ring also allows you to choose settings for underwater, sound, image stabilization, and other options. The top left thumb button selects shooting mode. The second button selects playback mode. The third button is the trash-can. The fourth button lets you set the camera's options. The controls make sense and are easy to use, even with light gloves on.

Start and Stop: When you start shooting video, the camera emits a quick chirp, and when you stop it emits a lower tone chirp, neither of which appear on the video itself. This audible feedback is wonderful when you are shooting blind, which I often do by stuffing the camera on a tiny tripod into my lifejacket pocket while kayaking. The camera takes about three seconds to power up when off, and it automatically turns off after about 4 minutes of no shooting to conserve battery life. I love that feature!

Shooting: The camera has an F2.8, 5.54mm lens, and software that tracks and focuses on faces (switchable). I frequently hold the camera in hand, arm extended, and shoot myself from the front, side, or even over-the-shoulder. The focal length is perfect for self-portrait shooting and narration. The zoom works nicely, though occasionally jumps slightly as it approaches full zoom. Image stabilization really helps when at full zoom big kudos to Kodak for this feature. It also helps when shooting trail running with arm extended.

Video quality: The video quality is excellent, and to my eyes, far better than that of the various Flip cameras. When I shoot calm subjects, I use 702P at 30 frames per second, which gives great results with a minimum of memory use. When I shoot action with a lot of subject motion or camera motion, I switch to 60 frames per second, and the results are stunningly good. The camera responds reasonably quickly to light level changes, such as panning up and down between a bright sky and dark ground, but you may see about 1/3 of a second of under or over exposure s the camera responds. If you zoom all the way in with the digital zoom it's not an optical zoom the picture will become slightly bluer and fuzzier, since you are using a smaller area of the sensor chip.

Image stabilization: I shoot sea kayaking videos, which contain lots of water movement as well as camera movement, and the image stabilization works pretty well. If you start seeing "jumpiness", such as when you rapidly pan, turn off image stabilization and it will get smoother. If, on the other hand, you are not panning, but simply trying to hold your palsied, shaking hand steady, turn on image stabilization and the result is very good.

Uploading to your computer: The first time you plug the camera into your computer it detects that the ArcSoft software is not installed and ask you to install it. The software is located in the camera; there is no external CD to lose, which is brilliant. Once installed, the software is extremely easy to use to select and upload shots and clips from the camera to your computer.

Making movies: The software lets you easily make movies by dragging and dropping clips into a sequence. Clips can be edited so you only get the good stuff, and you can tweak the light and color levels. You can add transitions, music, voice-over and even text frames with a variety of fonts, font sizes and colors. This is not a full-featured editing studio, but rather one that is incredibly easy to use for things like YouTube, Facebook and burn-to-DVD videos. You can save the "project", which contains all the settings for your move in an editable format, so you can come back later and add that missing scene and delete uncle Ed's belch.

Uploading to social media: The same software allows you to upload to a whole variety of social media, including YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, and burn your video to DVD. The upload process automatically formats the movie for best results on the particular social media you select. It then connects to your account and uploads the movie. I regularly upload 720P videos to YouTube. YouTube then automatically converts the upload to 360P, 480P and 720P, and lets viewers select the speed that works best on their computer/connection. You can see uploaded examples, each labeled with the shooting resolution and speed search youtube for "erikhy". (Note that these videos are from someone who has never shot ANY video before getting this camera.)

I'm in love with this camera for travel and adventure shooting.

Nikon Coolpix S8000 14 MP Digital Camera with 10x Optical Vibration Reduction (VR) Zoom and 3.0-Inc

I owned the very good Sony DSC-W350 (which I liked very much), but I managed to leave it in a rental car. Between the time I bought my Sony and now, Nikon released a new line, so I figured I'd give one of their best compact point and shoot cameras a try. I use a lot of Nikon's DSLR equipment, but their point-and-shoots have been a bit disappointing to me over the years. But I liked the S8000 and decided to give it a try and I'm glad I did...it's a wonderful point-and-shoot, even better than the Sony in every way.

First, I place a lot of emphasis on the size and shape of the camera and whether it just feels natural in my hands. The S8000 is very small and light, and sometimes really petite cameras just feel awkward to me. I'm happy to say that the S8000 gets it about perfect it's easy to hold, the controls feel like they're where you expect them, and I never accidentally hit say, the power button when I'm looking for something else. I also tend to like designs that put the lens in the middle of the camera, as opposed to some designs (like the otherwise very good Panasonics) that tend to put the lens off-center. With very little practice, I feel like I can work the Nikon with my eyes closed, and I never feel awkward with it.

The built-in LCD monitor is also very good and easy to read under most conditions, except maybe in very bright direct sunlight. Still, my eyes aren't fantastic, but I have no trouble navigating the menus or reviewing shots after I've taken them. As an added plus, the menus are structured in a way that's similar to Nikon's DSLR cameras, so if you're familiar with Nikon's other products, you'll feel right at home here.

It's also a fast camera. I don't find the start-up time to be particularly quick, but once you have it on, focus, zooming, shutter lag, flash recycle and so on are very, very fast indeed. The autofocus system seems to be about as fast as the system in my Nikon D3 most of the time, which is really impressive to say the least. With some of the older point and shoots I've owned, I felt like I'd miss shots because of shutter lag or how long it took to focus...not so with the S8000.

As for image quality, I have to say that I was skeptical that a 10x lens could perform as well as I want. Honestly, I'd rather have a super sharp 4x than a mediocre 10x, and this was my biggest concern with the Nikon. Well, I'm happy to say that I've been pleasantly surprised by the wide zoom range in the Nikon this is one really high performance lens, at least when you look at it in combination with all the other features the camera offers. It does great close-ups, letting you focus up to about half an inch from your subject. It seems to have a great optical anti-shake capability, permitting you to hand-hold the camera in fairly dark situations without resorting to a flash. The wide-angle end of the spectrum looks natural without some of the distortions you sometimes see on this type of camera. The worst thing I can say about the lens is that it has some purple fringing at the long end of the range nothing that can't be fixed in Photoshop, but it is noticeable.

Overall, I don't see much difference in the 10x lens on the Nikon versus the excellent 4x lens on my former Sony in terms of image quality. The Nikon seems to produce slightly warmer colors with more saturation and just a generally more vivid appearance. The Sony was more natural looking, but not a lot of difference otherwise. I do notice that Nikon seems to apply slightly less digital sharpening than Sony, but this again is easily corrected in whatever editing software you use if you want to. Frankly, some cameras tend to push the sharpening a bit too far, and portraits tend to come out looking a bit harsh as a result. The Nikon gives you a more natural look that most people will find pleasing plus you can always add sharpening after the fact if you need to.

If you're a novice, one thing to keep in mind is that at the telephoto end of the zoom range, the S8000 is equivalent to a 300mm on a 35mm camera. This offers quite some magnification but it also amplifies your tendency to get blurry pictures by inadvertently shaking the camera (for instance, as you press the shutter release). Nikon's vibration reduction system helps a lot, but you really need bright lighting (hence, high shutter speeds) to get consistently sharp pictures with this end of the zoom range. I'm sure we'll see subsequent reviewers complaining about fuzzy images at the long end of the zoom range, and no doubt this will be why. As a side note, the camera includes a tripod socket, so it's possible to get perfect pictures in low light, even at the 300mm end of the range but I rarely see people carrying around a five pound tripod for their six ounce camera.

The camera goes out to ISO 3200, but in my use so far, I'd only recommend up to ISO 400 for images you intend to print, maybe 800 for email/web images. Higher ISO than 800 get to look pretty poor, in my opinion. Of course, this is the nature of the beast these compact cameras have compact image sensors, and that means you just can't boost the sensitivity without introducing lots of noise.

The built-in flash is okay, but not super powerful. It does offer uniform lighting over the frame, even when using wide angle views a pet peeve of mine on other cameras. The S8000 also has automatic red-eye reduction built in, so you rarely see people pictures having lots of red-eye. Of course, I'd rather have great noise-free performance out to ISO 3200 so I don't need the flash in the first place, but absent that, the flash is a reasonable compromise.

Nikon includes their venerable D-lighting system, which is essentially a way to bring detail back into the picture when there's a huge contrast variation. It works well, for instance, with many flash shots, or when you have a person standing in the shade against a sunny background. Since you can also add these effects post-processing, I tend to turn the feature off in my cameras, but it does work well overall.

There are a few other included features I don't get much use out of. One is the video mode. I suppose if I want to take videos, I'd use a video camera, not a tiny point-and-shoot. Nikon doesn't seem to have put a lot of thought into the video mode anyway...it's "only" 720p, and in what seems like a poor design choice, you can't zoom the lens while filming. Another included feature I just don't find myself using is the burst mode that lets you take up to 16 lower quality (3MP) images in a very rapid sequence...generally, if I'm doing high-speed action photography, I'm doing it with my DSLR, not the point-and-shoot. Compared to the Sony I recently owned, there are also no panorama or HDR modes, but honestly, I don't miss either of these.

Overall, I think Nikon has a winner here and I absolutely recommend it for anyone wanting a compact but capable point-and-shoot.

I bought this camera because I wanted a camera that could both take high quality pictures of objects from a far away distance and took HD video. The Quality of the pictures of this camera are good from a far distance. I could easily read signs when zoomed in that I could not read from looking at them. I am a structural engineer so I needed something that I could read the structure types and be able to idetify the structures from a distance, in this it did its job.

Now the down side of the camera. The video quality of the video was excellent as well as the sound. The HUGE overlooked flaw is that recording indoors or out there is a high pitched squealing noise in the backround of every video no matter if it was played on lcd, computer, tube tv, or the camera itself. I tried the camera instore and it did the same thing (after I had taken it home and tested in depth). I have also seen example videos online where you can here the distinctive squeel.

If you are getting this camera for the picture quality only, look no further; but if like me you wanted HD video as well I would suggest looking at another camera.

Update***

I just purchased the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3, and wow. When comparing the photos I had saved with the Nikon and now the new photos I have taken of the exact same objects, the Panasonic clearly wins big. Along with my complaint of the Nikon's video the Panasonic also has a clearer HD video and stereo sound with no annoying whine in the background. And now the best part. I purchased it off amazon at $235, which is $65 less than the Nikon. I would highly recommend checking out the Panasonic Lumix first.

Buy Nikon Coolpix S8000 14 MP Digital Camera with 10x Optical Vibration Reduction (VR) Zoom and 3.0-Inc Now

After a few days' research and testing between Canon S90 and Canon SX210 at 2 shops, I decided to get a Canon S90 for its better image quality.

But when I went to a third shop, aiming to get Canon S90, I was shown on the computer screen the 2 photos (jpeg) taken at the same place (indoor) a few seconds ago, one by S90 and one by Nikon S8000. The photo taken by S8000 rendered the true colors, just as what I saw under the lighting, and the image did not have jagged edges as in Canon S80 when magnified at the computer. Then a couple of shots confirmed that the noise control between the two were not as I expected. At least under ISO 400, Nikon S8000 photos did not provide more noise than Canon S90. Actually, at ISO 125, I did observe that Nikon's resolution was better. And the LCD screen resolution of Nikon was also higher than Canon S90. True, Canon S80 allowed one to take RAW images and manual control, but I wanted a travel zoom camera and would not like to work with RAW images or excess processing of the images(otherwise I would take my DSLR.) And Nikon 30mm-300mm provides a much more flexible zoom than Canon's 28mm-105mm.

Having Nikon DSLRs myself, I had the impression that DCs were not Nikon's strong areas. But the test shots gave me enough confidence to get a Nikon S8000 back home and gave it a try. Under sunlight, the photos were so pleasing and much better than I have expected from a DC. The image sizes can be either at 4:3 or 16:9. At 300mm, the image is still very acceptable and at 30mm, I detect very little distortion. I mainly shot photos using the AUTO mode but the MACRO and FOOD modes are extremely useful. The FOOD scene, allowing me to change the color tones of the photo, gives such delightful photos of the dishes! To summarise, Nikon S8000 is a very pleasant surprise for me. I got the silver one which had a very solid build and cool design. To top it all, I got a grey Nikon umbrella (which could be used as a reflector) and Coolpix camera bag for free at a local Asia dealer.

For the limitations, Nikon's menu seemed to be a bit less user-friendly than the old Panasonic DC I owned. I also hope there will be more reviews comparing S8000 and other cameras, especially at high ISOs.

Read Best Reviews of Nikon Coolpix S8000 14 MP Digital Camera with 10x Optical Vibration Reduction (VR) Zoom and 3.0-Inc Here

I was looking for a camera that provided outstanding picture quality and quick response time without having to lug around a DSLR. After comparing similar models from Cannon and Panasonic, I settled on this one. I have not been disappointed at all. The auto mode provides crisp and clear photos, even at very close range. This is very important for a novice photographer such as myself. For users who wish to control the picture output a bit more, there are 15 scene selections and many other advanced image settings choose from. The menus all have contextual help settings to help making selecting from these options a little less daunting.

As one of the previous reviewers pointed out, there is a high pitch noise present during video playback. It is not horrible but definitely noticeable. I did not purchase the camera primarily for capturing video, but would be lying if I said the HD recording capability was a feature I overlooked. While this is not a deal breaker by any means, it did keep me from giving a full 5 stars on my review.

Want Nikon Coolpix S8000 14 MP Digital Camera with 10x Optical Vibration Reduction (VR) Zoom and 3.0-Inc Discount?

I read all of these reviews before going shopping for this camera. The movie option is something I frequently use. The noise complaints worried me so I visited several stores and tried to find out what they were talking about. I could not find one camera with this noise problem. I brought it home, recorded a movie in a closed room, downloaded it to my computer, cranked up the sound, and still did not detect any noise that I've seen described in these reviews. The only noise I could come up with was a snoring dog from across the room. I have taken movies & photos of every type, from every angle, in every environment and under every lighting condition possible. I love this camera!! It's small but very comfortable to use and perfect for dropping into a pocket or purse. I don't like missing great photo opportunities so I like my camera handy at all times. I highly recommend it.

Azden WLX-PRO Lavaliere System

• LEDs on transmitter and receiver to confirm system status. Earphone included to monitor sound that is being recorded. Receiver plugs into camera's external microphone jack. Both units use one 9V battery each. Includes WR-PRO receiver, WM-PRO belt-pack transmitter, and lavaliere electret condenser microphone.

The Azden transmitter-receiver system has operated marvelously well for me over scores of interviews. As an aspiring video maker it was a product I should have bought a long time ago.

Mine is the 9v-powered model, not the AA. But it has proven well-made, light and easy to use.

There's something neat about micing people with a lavaliere unit. I find that they enjoy the attention of attaching the mic and the professional touch that it brings to the taping.

Being able to range abut the room while taping and simultaneously retaining good audio is a remarkable experience. Another benefit of micing someone is that cuts way back on ambient noise. The din of voices surrounding your interview is a typical intrusion; using the lavaliere cuts out a great deal of the unwanted sonic information.

Buy Azden WLX-PRO Lavaliere System Now

Overall, this is a good investment for beginning videographer. It works as described, yet I found that it's sound needed post work if it was going to be presaentable. My standards are not unrealistic, yet I was disappointed when I first worked with this mic. It comes with a lavalier mic, and a handheld. Of the two, the handheld pickup better, and is more manageable. Both only record in mono, so you have to set your camera to place the signal on the two channels, or do so in postproduction.

Still, if you wish to use a mic that is dependable, is inconspicuous, and has a small learning curve, this mic could serve your purposes.

Read Best Reviews of Azden WLX-PRO Lavaliere System Here

Affordable and effective. Didn't pick up a lot of background music or talking, and got a good deep sound from the person wearing it. Used it for a wedding and the other wireless systems used didn't interfear with it's opperation nor did the background clog up the mic.

Want Azden WLX-PRO Lavaliere System Discount?

The Azden is a reasonable, reliable, and low cost way of stepping up your audio abilities to the wireless level. I've used it professionally in many occasions, and have mixed opinions. I just have the lavaliere (not the handheld).

1. Don't expect superb sound quality. Mine, at least is blaring when it comes to audio levels... it will max out your camera's audio input unless you can turn down the mic input. It provides rich lows, but is very weak on the highs. You can't boost the highs too much in post, because then it highlights all of the audio "fuzz."

2. It's best for convenience, not distance. Use it as a convenience to avoid wires, but don't expect it to work solidly from 100 feet away. As you move farther away from the receiver (more than 25 feet), you'll start to run into dead spots and random static.

3. CELL PHONES WILL MAKE THIS THING GO CRAZY. The transmitter and receiver are highly sensitive to cell phone interference. Everybody within 25 feet of you will need to turn off the cell phones completely, or you'll get that annoying cell phone buzz.

4. Battery life is pretty darn good. I've used the same batteries for hours beyond what they suggest that you do.

Overall, it's a good place to start if you're doing amateur or small scale productions. But if you're client is paying $1,500 for a TV commercial, you'd better have a good Sennheiser or Audio Technica to meet production standards.

Save 40% Off

I was nervous at first recording because the audio volume was too low, and I lost quality by boosting with software. I'm sure I voided my warrenty, but I opened both the receiver and tranmitter to see if I could make adjustments... there is a tiny screw labeled VR101 (trans) and VR2 (rec) that adjust pick up. I basically maxed both of them out because I'm soft spoken, but it works like a charm now. Works to reduce pickup as well, if needed. Just be careful of cheap plastic housing when opening.

Cmple - 6FT Ultra High Speed HDMI Cable 1080p HDTV LCD Pink

I bought this cable to hook up my pink HD LCD TV to the rest of my equipment and it did a great job, besides also looking good due to it's color.

Exactly what a college student to connect TV to their laptop. Just a heads up, if you have a mac you'll probably want to buy an adapter as well

Buy Cmple - 6FT Ultra High Speed HDMI Cable 1080p HDTV LCD Pink Now

Easystore 4 GB Class 2 SDHC Flash Memory Card

I bought two of these 4 Gigabyte cards. I tried them in my HP digital camera and received a "card unreadable" error. I tried putting them into my computer thinking that maybe they needed to be formatted...and both cards crashed my computer. I can understand that maybe one card every now and then might be a dud, but what are teh odds of me getting two duds? I guess you get what you pay for.

Worked in two different products, no issues. For the money, it's 5 stars. Works as designed.

Buy Easystore 4 GB Class 2 SDHC Flash Memory Card Now

This is a cheap quality card. I would not trust this card with take pictures or anything that cannot be easily reproduced.

Read Best Reviews of Easystore 4 GB Class 2 SDHC Flash Memory Card Here

I tried 3 different SD card readers, none can read it although all 3 can read a Kingston 2GB card, and one card reader can read my other 8GB SDHC card. This is the first SD card I have problem with.

Though my ASUS netbook (which has a built-in reader) is able to read it, it is still inconvenient.

Anyway, go with other brand like Kingston, Sandisk, Transcend, A-Data etc.

Want Easystore 4 GB Class 2 SDHC Flash Memory Card Discount?

This card works great and stores alot of pictures and video on my digital camera. The only con is that the card reader on our computer won't read a class 2 card. But that was easily fixed. I got a card reader with a usb cable that hooks up to the computer for about 1 4. No big deal. And now I can use that to upload photos on my laptop which doesn't have a card reader but does have a usb connection.

Just note that you may need a card reader especially if your computer's a couple years old.

Save 70% Off

Nikon D3100 Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm & 55-200mm DX AF-S Zoom Lens with 32GB Card + Filte

I AM AN EXPERT ON CAMERAS BUT I CAN TELL YOU THAT THE QUALITY OF THE PICTURES THIS CAMERA TAKES ARE JUST WONDERFUL!. IT IS EASY TO SET UP, THE INSTRUCTIONS ARE CONCISE AND CLEAR AND THE PRODUCT IS ANOTHER EXCELLENT PIECE OF ART FROM NIKON

Professional Monitor Lilliput 9.7'' 969 A/o/p Color LCD Monitor with Hdmi, Ypbpr, Dual Audio Input

This is a good choice for a "big enough" portable monitor. We've had plenty of trouble from smaller and larger monitors, and unless you're willing to pony-up at least three times the price of this unit, there's really little reason for complaint. So far I get about 2 hrs of continuous use with Sony F970 batteries.

So, the downsides first...

This is a 4:3 panel.

16:9 is fairly easily set, but only after accessing the menu. (no shortcut)

Advanced features work, but only in 4:3 mode. (16:9 must be manually reset)

This unit requires a sturdy arm for tripod attachment.

Less intuitive menu.

No Sharpness adjustment.

No VESA mount.

Good stuff...

Big enough to focus with. 1:1 pixel zoom is nice.

Pass-through HDMI is lag-free. Very nice when viewing on another monitor.

Sturdy stand.

Lots of inputs.

Works with DSLR.

Overscan toggle.

Works with common batteries.

Folding shade is very snappy.

Hi

I baught

Lilliput 9.7'' 969 A/o/p

I want to ask you wiche kind of battery I use for this screen

thanks alot

Buy Professional Monitor Lilliput 9.7'' 969 A/o/p Color LCD Monitor with Hdmi, Ypbpr, Dual Audio Input Now

t is unfortunate that a company that has good presence in the audiovisual market, have such poor judgment in the development of their products, this monitor could be one of the best but it was because you have so marked and inconceivable mistakes: if you have the screen in 16:9 and want to use some of the functions F1 to F4 for example false color, peaking focus, zebra, and other setting, it automatically jumps to 4:3 which is unacceptable and unprofessional, besides annoying to the extreme

Read Best Reviews of Professional Monitor Lilliput 9.7'' 969 A/o/p Color LCD Monitor with Hdmi, Ypbpr, Dual Audio Input Here

CIB CUC8795 600TVL Outdoor CCD Bullet Infrared Day Night Security Camera w/ S...

The product description states that this camera has a 6 mm lens. In fact, it is 3.6 mm, i.e., a much wider angle. This is a problem in that you have to mount the camera much closer to the subject to see adequate detail, as for facial recognition, which may not always be possible. For longer range view, look for at least a 6 mm lens or get one with a zoom.

very satisfied with the performance of this camera as I have searched many times to find out which one is good quality with good price , after I received this camera , I dont believe how they are clearer than my others camera that I bought double the price , day time object look excellence , night time real good enough to see object with in 20ft , I would recommend this item to anyone who is in search of quality with fair priceUSA Security Store -CCTV High Resolution CCD 600TVL High Resolution Indoor/Outdoor Vandal Bullet Color Security Camera Infrared Day Night Vision with Sony Super HAD CCD Image Sensor

Buy CIB CUC8795 600TVL Outdoor CCD Bullet Infrared Day Night Security Camera w/ S... Now

Easy to install, the view is very good. Wide angle viewing. My other cameras only show small areas low quality. This one shows a larger area and much clearer.

Read Best Reviews of CIB CUC8795 600TVL Outdoor CCD Bullet Infrared Day Night Security Camera w/ S... Here

this camera is a great camera it show a great picture from about a good 60 to 70 feet away it very easy to install .

Want CIB CUC8795 600TVL Outdoor CCD Bullet Infrared Day Night Security Camera w/ S... Discount?

I don't like it because is not night vision capable. You can not see anything on the dark with this even with you back up lights on. Picture quality is terrible -very blurry/fuzzy. I won't buy USA Security Store products again.

Save 46% Off

Lorex LW2110 Wireless Digital Security Camera

My husband installed this security camera on our front porch and the receiver on our Samsung TV. The installation was reasonably simple once the RCA adapter was found inside the box. The biggest concern with installation was finding a power source for the camera on the outside of my house. For many people the need for a power source near the camera will be a deciding factor as to whether or not to buy a wireless or wired system. (Wireless systems require a power source near the camera to run the wireless transmitter.) The receiver is located in the center of my house with the signal traveling through several walls and a brick facade. Despite this, the picture is still clear on my TV. The video only refreshes a few times per second giving a choppy display as you would expect from a security camera and not a webcam. There is no audio included with this system; however, if you're looking for a wireless digital security camera with good range and picture quality and connects to most devices, this camera may be a good choice for you.

I purchased 2 Lorex LW2110 Wireless Digital Security Cameras and one was damaged. I called Lorex to get a new camera and was told to wait . After waiting and waiting I finally received a camera that was refurbished. I was told no matter how much money I spend they will never send a new product, it has to be a refurbish. The camera I received came with giant scratches on it and one of the places to secure the bolt was completely stripped out. This is a terrible company never do business with them.

Buy Lorex LW2110 Wireless Digital Security Camera Now

The lorex LW2110 Wireless Digital Security Camera is a user friendly security camera. Setup is relatively easy with the only problem is being able to power the camera in a remote location. There are 2 settings for viewing, a 640 x 480, 12fps mode and a more smooth, 320x240, 30 fps mode which is controlled via a button on the receiver. The night viewing capability is excellent in low light conditions and is easily capable of viewing up to 60ft as stated on the box.

Pros:

+ Easy setup

+ Low light capabilities

+ Wireless

+ Weather proof housing

Cons:

Limited spatial resolution

Slow frame rates at higher resolution

Not network capable

The LW2110 field of view is more suitable for a store shop surveilance than any kind of "long" range (i.e 60ft) surveillance. The spatial resolution of the camera makes it very hard to determine what a person is doing 60ft away let alone identify a person. The slower frame rate for higher resolution mode is also very degrading to the imagery. Things can easily be missed by dropped frames along with this low frame rate. I understand the lower frame rate is most likely to preserve bandwidth but with all the wireless technologies available I would expect better performance than 12fps at 640x480.

Read Best Reviews of Lorex LW2110 Wireless Digital Security Camera Here

The concept of this wireless security camera is great and easy to setup, yet it heavily interfered with your wireless internet network.

I brought the DVR with 4 wireless camera to install around the house. However, whenever the wireless receiver power up, my wireless internet network basically dead on the spot. My family rely heavily on wifi access from VoIP, smart phone, tablet, laptop, computer, smart TV, etc. After some digging and test and trail, I finally realized that the Lorex LW2110 Wireless Digital Security Camera is running on 2.4GHz band, which is same band as most of the router out there. Whenever the receiver is on, it will jammed the 2.4 GHz band and virtually make all the other wifi receiver slow down (in my case, from 20MB to 1.5MB according to speedtest website). Unless you have the newer 5.8 GHz wireless router in your home network, this unit will jam your normal 2.4GHz Band wifi router.

Want Lorex LW2110 Wireless Digital Security Camera Discount?

We required this system for outdoor use. We contacted Lorex directly and discussed it's viability and were satisfied by their response. However, the wireless cameras are so weak that they could not get through one wall from 60 feet away. Forget about the 400 feet advertised...not a chance!

The internet feature is not wireless, so has to be connected by cable. This it ridiculous in today's world! The timeline graphics are also so outdated that they look like DOS! Service from lorex after the fact was non existent. Stay away!

No, I would not recommend this to a friend

Save 44% Off

Belkin HDMI to HDMI Cable (6ft)

I was told by my cable company I should order a HDMI cable wire for better reception. I ordered one from Antoline, when I received the package I opened it and attached the wire to my cable box. The wire was not making a connection to the box so I called my service provider. They walked me through it and I was told the wire might be faulty.

I removed the wire and decided to return it. I went to Amazon's on line return dept and was connected to Antotine. After answering some questions I was sent an e mail saying my return was denied.

I called the company and spoke to a man who was totally rude and argumentative. He told me they wouldn't accept a package that had been opened because they can not resell it. He said I should have made sure it was the right wire before I ordered it. I explained this was the correct wire which my cable company suggested but it didn't work on my TV. He said he didn't care and asked if I would buy a wire from a package that had been opened.

I tried to explain there was no way I would know the wire didn't work if I didn't OPEN the package. He was adamant but finally said he would refer my complaint to another dept. I receieved an e mail a few days later saying they would allow me to return it via UPS within 10 days. It cost me over seven dollars to send it back which was the cost of the wire in the first place.

I will never do business with this company again. The return policy should be clear saying it can not be returned once the package is opened. I'm sure they wouldn't have many customers if they did.

This is an excellent HDMI cable. These are very good quality. These cables are even that expensive for the quality you get. The packaging was also nice simple and easy to open but also well protected. Great product, Thanks!!!

Buy Belkin HDMI to HDMI Cable (6ft) Now

After seeing the prices for HDMI cables at Apple and my local Radio Shack, I went online to Amazon and decided to purchase these to hook up my Apple TV. All I can say is that they work great! For a fraction of the price, I have excellent HDMI cables that were here in 2 days, thanks to my Prime membership. Never again will I pay inflated prices for cables!

Read Best Reviews of Belkin HDMI to HDMI Cable (6ft) Here

I purchased HDMI cable for my DVD Player.

I am getting good quality and have no problems for the last 2 years.

Want Belkin HDMI to HDMI Cable (6ft) Discount?

Truely nothing wrong with Belkin wires. But the Amazon super saver deal takes 2 months for a wire to ship. I ordered this wire along with a $250. bluray player more than 2 weeks ago. Due to the super saver it's gonna be another 4-6 weeks before they ship it. Also it's not stated that it will take 1-2 months for shipping til you recieve the email stating your credit card has been charged. This is my first purchase from here and my last I'll be returning back to newegg and tigerdirect for my future purchases. I'd rather give more money away than save 20 dollars for this crappy of a service. If any amazon people read this good. I want it to be known that I will recomend any other shopping site to everyone I know including on my Tech Review sites and Tech help desk sites. I think this is a ripoff and if it hadn't already been charged I'd have canceled it by now. I will never come back for another item on amazon because of this.

Save 78% Off

Swann SECURANET-4 Bulldog LCD Combo Kit

Placing the cameras was the hardest part of the setup, the system needs longer camera cables. I did find the enclosed instructions quite lacking in detail and vague, making the DVR programming difficult. The obvious outsourced Tech Support was horrific, as the person I actually talked to had such a thick accent, I could not understand him. Otherwise, the system works great! It has already caught a late night prowler in real time monitoring, allowing me to confront him and eject him from the property.

SecurityMan D.I.Y Mini 2.4GHz Wireless Color Camera Kit with Audio (MINIAIRWATCH)

I bought two of these units based on the first comment.

They are easy to install and are easily hidden. But I ended up

having to return both units, because the video on both cameras

kept getting a lot of video noise after they were in use for a while.

I could not set the sensitivity on my DVR low enough to counter act

the noise to prevent false triggering, which would result in continuous recording. I just couldn't use these cameras. It's too bad, because

they look like nicely built units, and would be ideal for hidden

security purposes.

Doesn't work as described,every channel has interference. Its going in the garbage. Don,t waste you time and money.

Buy SecurityMan D.I.Y Mini 2.4GHz Wireless Color Camera Kit with Audio (MINIAIRWATCH) Now

Worked great and the Picture on my screen was great !!! Looking for help you need to get one of these.....

Read Best Reviews of SecurityMan D.I.Y Mini 2.4GHz Wireless Color Camera Kit with Audio (MINIAIRWATCH) Here

Worked for what I needed, but must be used in a bright area to get a good pic. I used it in my garage to watch and see if my dog went potty as she gets tied in garage if it is raining out. Product worked ok for my needs.

Want SecurityMan D.I.Y Mini 2.4GHz Wireless Color Camera Kit with Audio (MINIAIRWATCH) Discount?

No matter what channel it was on there was alot of interference. Also Loud crackling noises, distorted picture and very annoying. Sent it back.